Characterization of adherent primary cell lines from fresh human glioblastoma tissue, defining glial fibrillary acidic protein as a reliable marker in establishment of glioblastoma cell culture.


Journal

Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2573-8348
Titre abrégé: Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101747728

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
revised: 06 11 2020
received: 12 06 2020
accepted: 09 11 2020
pubmed: 1 12 2020
medline: 30 11 2021
entrez: 30 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Primary adherent glioblastoma cell lines are an important tool in investigating cellular and molecular tumor biology, as well as treatment options for patients. The phenotypical and immunocytochemical characterization of primary cell lines from glioblastoma specimens during establishment is of great importance, in order to reliably identify these cell lines as primary glioblastoma cell lines. Sixteen primary adherent cell lines out of 34 glioblastoma samples (47%) were established and further characterized. For phenotypical characterization, morphology and growth characteristics of the cells were classified. The cell lines had a high growth rate with a doubling time of 2 to 14 days. Morphologically, the cells displayed spindle-form or polygonal to amorphous shapes and grow as monolayer or in foci without evidence of contact inhibition. The cells were able to migrate and to form colonies. For further characterization, the protein expression of the astrocyte-specific protein glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), the glial marker S100B, the neuronal marker TUBB3, and malignancy marker VIM, as well as the progenitor markers NES and SOX2, the proliferation marker MKI67, and the fibroblast marker TE7 were determined. Based on the immunocytochemical validation criterion of a coexpression of GFAP and S100B, 15 out of these 16 cell lines (94%) were defined as primary glioblastoma cell lines (pGCL). All 15 pGCL expressed TUBB3 and VIM. NES and SOX2 were stained positively in 13/15 and 6/15 pGCL. MKI67 was expressed in 11/15 and TE7 in 2/15 pGCL. These results point out that in self-established primary adherent glioblastoma cell lines, the expression of the specific astrocytic and glial markers GFAP and S100B and of the malignancy and progenitor markers VIM, NES, and SOX2 has to be validated. These data show that primary cell lines of glioblastoma origin with high malignant potential are reliably to establish using standardized validation criteria.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Primary adherent glioblastoma cell lines are an important tool in investigating cellular and molecular tumor biology, as well as treatment options for patients.
AIM
The phenotypical and immunocytochemical characterization of primary cell lines from glioblastoma specimens during establishment is of great importance, in order to reliably identify these cell lines as primary glioblastoma cell lines.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Sixteen primary adherent cell lines out of 34 glioblastoma samples (47%) were established and further characterized. For phenotypical characterization, morphology and growth characteristics of the cells were classified. The cell lines had a high growth rate with a doubling time of 2 to 14 days. Morphologically, the cells displayed spindle-form or polygonal to amorphous shapes and grow as monolayer or in foci without evidence of contact inhibition. The cells were able to migrate and to form colonies. For further characterization, the protein expression of the astrocyte-specific protein glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), the glial marker S100B, the neuronal marker TUBB3, and malignancy marker VIM, as well as the progenitor markers NES and SOX2, the proliferation marker MKI67, and the fibroblast marker TE7 were determined. Based on the immunocytochemical validation criterion of a coexpression of GFAP and S100B, 15 out of these 16 cell lines (94%) were defined as primary glioblastoma cell lines (pGCL). All 15 pGCL expressed TUBB3 and VIM. NES and SOX2 were stained positively in 13/15 and 6/15 pGCL. MKI67 was expressed in 11/15 and TE7 in 2/15 pGCL.
CONCLUSION
These results point out that in self-established primary adherent glioblastoma cell lines, the expression of the specific astrocytic and glial markers GFAP and S100B and of the malignancy and progenitor markers VIM, NES, and SOX2 has to be validated. These data show that primary cell lines of glioblastoma origin with high malignant potential are reliably to establish using standardized validation criteria.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33251771
doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1324
pmc: PMC8451382
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
GFAP protein, human 0
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1324

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Eur J Cell Biol. 1998 Aug;76(4):279-87
pubmed: 9765058
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001 Nov-Dec;37(10):625-8
pubmed: 11776963
Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109
pubmed: 17618441
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Aug;14(8):482-495
pubmed: 29985475
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1983 Mar;42(2):113-21
pubmed: 6338157
Neoplasia. 2003 Nov-Dec;5(6):520-32
pubmed: 14965445
Neurobiol Dis. 2009 Apr;34(1):1-10
pubmed: 19100327
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9363-7
pubmed: 7568133
Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Apr;26(2):189-94
pubmed: 22176646
Cancer Lett. 2013 Sep 10;338(1):158-67
pubmed: 22659734
EBioMedicine. 2015 Aug 15;2(10):1351-63
pubmed: 26629530
Genome Biol. 2014 Dec 03;15(12):530
pubmed: 25608559
Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):421-43
pubmed: 21219963
Tumour Biol. 2016 Nov;37(11):15333-15339
pubmed: 27704357
Am J Pathol. 2014 Mar;184(3):609-17
pubmed: 24378408
Cancer Cell. 2006 May;9(5):391-403
pubmed: 16697959
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Jun;1793(6):1008-22
pubmed: 19110011
Cancer Cell. 2010 Jan 19;17(1):98-110
pubmed: 20129251
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3624-32
pubmed: 15897557
Nat Genet. 2016 Jul;48(7):768-76
pubmed: 27270107
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Mar;37(3):425-34
pubmed: 23347220
Oncogenesis. 2013 Aug 05;2:e61
pubmed: 23917223
J Neurooncol. 1999 Feb;41(3):247-54
pubmed: 10359144
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jul 15;19(14):3764-75
pubmed: 23719262
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0150271
pubmed: 27028405
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1968;74(4):465-86
pubmed: 4313504
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008 Apr;67(4):341-54
pubmed: 18379434
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1965 Jun 9;19(6):739-44
pubmed: 4953930
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2000 Feb;26(1):22-30
pubmed: 10736064
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 20;112(3):851-6
pubmed: 25561528
Trends Mol Med. 2011 Jun;17(6):301-312
pubmed: 21411370
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 5;110(10):4009-14
pubmed: 23412337
Science. 2014 Jun 20;344(6190):1396-401
pubmed: 24925914
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973 Nov;51(5):1417-23
pubmed: 4357758
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Cancer Cell Int. 2005 May 10;5(1):13
pubmed: 15885136
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jan 1;34(1):251-66
pubmed: 12118559
Cell. 2016 Jan 28;164(3):550-63
pubmed: 26824661
Cancer Res. 1986 Nov;46(11):5893-902
pubmed: 3019542
Cancer Res. 1996 Dec 15;56(24):5713-9
pubmed: 8971180
J Histochem Cytochem. 2008 Apr;56(4):347-58
pubmed: 18071065
Cell. 2019 Aug 8;178(4):835-849.e21
pubmed: 31327527
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0153097
pubmed: 27070930
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(3):334-48
pubmed: 23412423
Am J Transl Res. 2016 May 15;8(5):2149-58
pubmed: 27347322
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316
pubmed: 29260225
BMC Cancer. 2011 Dec 20;11:524
pubmed: 22185371
J Cell Physiol. 2009 Dec;221(3):505-13
pubmed: 19650075
Acta Neuropathol. 1986;70(3-4):209-19
pubmed: 3020858
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Apr;4(2):e1324
pubmed: 33251771
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 11;8(15):25582-25598
pubmed: 28424427
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 30;8(56):95896-95913
pubmed: 29221175
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Acta Neuropathol. 1981;53(1):21-8
pubmed: 7211194
Methods Mol Med. 1996;2:63-80
pubmed: 21359734
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Tsitologiia. 2016;58(5):349-55
pubmed: 30188626
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1985 Jul;17(3):257-68
pubmed: 2988753
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 07;8(8):e71070
pubmed: 23951083

Auteurs

Susanne Grube (S)

Department of Neurosurgery, Section of Experimental Neurooncology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Diana Freitag (D)

Department of Neurosurgery, Section of Experimental Neurooncology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Rolf Kalff (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, Section of Experimental Neurooncology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Christian Ewald (C)

Department of Neurosurgery, Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg, Germany.

Jan Walter (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Section of Experimental Neurooncology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center Saarbruecken GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH