Dietary supplementation of Ascophylum nodosum improved kidney function of mink challenged with Aleutian mink disease virus.
Aleutian mink disease virus; American mink
Ascophylum nodosum
Kidney function
Serum profile
Journal
BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Nov 2020
30 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
22
07
2020
accepted:
19
11
2020
entrez:
1
12
2020
pubmed:
2
12
2020
medline:
29
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Feed additives which can ease the negative effects of infection by the Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) are of interest to mink farmers. The effects of kelp meal (Ascophylum nodosum) supplementation on immune response, virus replication and blood parameters of mink inoculated with AMDV were assessed. AMDV-free black mink (n = 75) were intranasally inoculated with a local strain of AMDV and fed a commercial pellet supplemented with kelp meal at the rates of 1.5% or 0.75% of the feed or were kept as controls (no kelp) for 451 days. Blood was collected on days 0 (pre-inoculation), 31, 56, 99, 155, 366 and 451 post-inoculation (dpi). No significant difference was observed among the treatments for the proportion of animals positive for antibodies against the virus measured by the counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), viremia measured by PCR, antibody titer measured by quantitative ELISA, total serum protein measured by a refractometer or elevated levels of gamma globulin measured by iodine agglutination test at the sampling occasions. At the termination of the experiment on 451 dpi, there were no differences among treatments for antibody titer measured by CIEP, total serum protein, albumin, globulins, albumin:globulin ratio, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and proportions of PCR positive spleen, lymph node or bone marrow samples, but blood urea nitrogen and creatine levels were significantly lower in the 1.5% kelp supplemented group than in the controls. Kelp supplementation improved kidney function of mink infected with AMDV with no effect on liver function, immune response to infection by AMDV or virus replication.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Feed additives which can ease the negative effects of infection by the Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) are of interest to mink farmers. The effects of kelp meal (Ascophylum nodosum) supplementation on immune response, virus replication and blood parameters of mink inoculated with AMDV were assessed. AMDV-free black mink (n = 75) were intranasally inoculated with a local strain of AMDV and fed a commercial pellet supplemented with kelp meal at the rates of 1.5% or 0.75% of the feed or were kept as controls (no kelp) for 451 days. Blood was collected on days 0 (pre-inoculation), 31, 56, 99, 155, 366 and 451 post-inoculation (dpi).
RESULTS
RESULTS
No significant difference was observed among the treatments for the proportion of animals positive for antibodies against the virus measured by the counter-immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), viremia measured by PCR, antibody titer measured by quantitative ELISA, total serum protein measured by a refractometer or elevated levels of gamma globulin measured by iodine agglutination test at the sampling occasions. At the termination of the experiment on 451 dpi, there were no differences among treatments for antibody titer measured by CIEP, total serum protein, albumin, globulins, albumin:globulin ratio, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and proportions of PCR positive spleen, lymph node or bone marrow samples, but blood urea nitrogen and creatine levels were significantly lower in the 1.5% kelp supplemented group than in the controls.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Kelp supplementation improved kidney function of mink infected with AMDV with no effect on liver function, immune response to infection by AMDV or virus replication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33256708
doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02685-w
pii: 10.1186/s12917-020-02685-w
pmc: PMC7706252
doi:
Substances chimiques
Creatine
MU72812GK0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
465Subventions
Organisme : Department of Agriculture, Nova Scotia
ID : RA2013-0003
Organisme : Tidal Organics
ID : n/a
Références
Viral Immunol. 2018 Jan/Feb;31(1):69-77
pubmed: 28829241
Mar Drugs. 2019 Jun 22;17(6):
pubmed: 31234532
J Virol Methods. 2016 Sep;235:144-151
pubmed: 27283885
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Jan 31;168(2-4):420-7
pubmed: 24389253
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122194
pubmed: 25822750
Am J Vet Res. 1996 Dec;57(12):1706-10
pubmed: 8950422
Mar Drugs. 2019 Sep 24;17(10):
pubmed: 31554251
Res Vet Sci. 2019 Jun;124:85-92
pubmed: 30856435
Int J Biol Macromol. 2016 Jan;82:83-8
pubmed: 26472515
Can J Comp Med Vet Sci. 1964 Jan;28(1):8-12
pubmed: 17649484
Res Vet Sci. 1973 Nov;15(3):381-3
pubmed: 4134383
J Immunol. 1975 Oct;115(4):1034-7
pubmed: 51871
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Sep 17;173(1-2):50-8
pubmed: 25139658
Prev Vet Med. 2017 May 1;140:60-66
pubmed: 28460751
Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Jan 1;227:115280
pubmed: 31590855
Int J Biol Macromol. 2013 Nov;62:70-5
pubmed: 23994790
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jan;7(1):18-22
pubmed: 203601
J Virol. 1984 Apr;50(1):38-41
pubmed: 6199516
Mar Drugs. 2019 Aug 21;17(9):
pubmed: 31438588
J Anim Sci. 2013 Dec;91(12):5654-67
pubmed: 24146153
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1961 Aug-Sep;107:919-20
pubmed: 13906570
Mar Drugs. 2020 Apr 22;18(4):
pubmed: 32331442
Mar Drugs. 2015 Jan 16;13(1):558-80
pubmed: 25603348
Can J Microbiol. 2017 Apr;63(4):341-349
pubmed: 28177788
J Virol Methods. 2011 Jan;171(1):81-5
pubmed: 20951744
Am J Vet Res. 1963 Jan;24:168-73
pubmed: 14032005
Viruses. 2018 Aug 30;10(9):
pubmed: 30200234
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):637-44
pubmed: 6195178
Am J Vet Res. 1996 Dec;57(12):1753-8
pubmed: 8950430
Am J Vet Res. 1977 Oct;38(10):1619-24
pubmed: 201189
J Virol. 1985 Sep;55(3):853-6
pubmed: 2991603
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Oct 1;102(1):75-82
pubmed: 21788091
Poult Sci. 2014 Dec;93(12):2991-3001
pubmed: 25352682
Int J Biol Macromol. 2014 Feb;63:38-42
pubmed: 24444887
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015 May;27(3):287-94
pubmed: 25862712
J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):575-93
pubmed: 4979953
Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2426
pubmed: 31708898
Virus Res. 2014 May 12;184:14-9
pubmed: 24561116
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000 Mar;45(3):208-27
pubmed: 10702339
Infect Agents Dis. 1994 Dec;3(6):279-301
pubmed: 7889316
Res Vet Sci. 2017 Apr;111:127-134
pubmed: 28249174
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:379407
pubmed: 24516503
Infect Immun. 1975 Jan;11(1):92-4
pubmed: 803925
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Oct 1;106(3-4):332-8
pubmed: 22497690
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2012;34(2):99-106
pubmed: 21967018
J Wildl Dis. 1994 Oct;30(4):599-602
pubmed: 7760500
N Engl J Med. 1972 Apr 6;286(14):748-57
pubmed: 4554517
Mar Drugs. 2016 Mar 09;14(3):
pubmed: 27005637
J Wildl Dis. 2012 Apr;48(2):497-502
pubmed: 22493130
Acta Vet Scand. 2013 Feb 08;55:10
pubmed: 23394546
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020 Jun;8(2):150-164
pubmed: 32167659
Int J Biol Macromol. 2004 Apr;34(1-2):63-71
pubmed: 15178011
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Apr;81(4):477-81
pubmed: 6702748