Implementation of frailty preoperative assessment to predict outcome in patients undergoing urological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
#Urology
frailty
mortality
patient-centred care
postoperative complications
preoperative risk assessment
urological surgery
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
2
12
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
1
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A common limit of the widely used risk scores for preoperative assessment is the lack of information about aspects linked to frailty that may affect outcome, especially in the setting of elderly patients undergoing urological surgery. Frailty has recently been introduced as an additional characteristic to be assessed for better identifying patients at risk of negative outcomes. To examine the evidence for recent advances in preoperative assessment in patients undergoing urological surgery focussing on the detrimental effect of frailty on outcome, including major (mPCs) and total postoperative complications (tPCs), discharge to a facility, and mortality. The secondary aim was to establish which cut-off scores of the modified Frailty Index (mFI, 11 items) and/or simplified FI (sFI, five items) predicted PCs. We searched PubMed, the Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov from inception to 31 May 2020. Studies reporting relationships between the investigated outcomes and patients' frailty were included. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) through a random effect model by using Revman 5.4. Frailty, assessed by different tools, was associated with a significantly higher rate of 30-day (OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-1.89) and 90-day (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14-3.82) mPCs and 30-day tPCs (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.76-2.52). A mFI of ≥2 was associated with a higher rate of 30-day mPCs (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.69-1.89) and greater 30-day mortality (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.10-5.49). A pre-planned post hoc analysis also revealed that a sFI of ≥3 was predictive of mPCs (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.12-5.12). Frailty assessment may help to predict PCs and mortality in patients undergoing major urological surgery. Either a mFi of ≥2 or sFI of ≥3 should be considered potential 'red flags' for preoperative risk assessment and decision-making. There is not enough evidence to confirm the necessity to perform frailty assessment in minor urological surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A common limit of the widely used risk scores for preoperative assessment is the lack of information about aspects linked to frailty that may affect outcome, especially in the setting of elderly patients undergoing urological surgery. Frailty has recently been introduced as an additional characteristic to be assessed for better identifying patients at risk of negative outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the evidence for recent advances in preoperative assessment in patients undergoing urological surgery focussing on the detrimental effect of frailty on outcome, including major (mPCs) and total postoperative complications (tPCs), discharge to a facility, and mortality. The secondary aim was to establish which cut-off scores of the modified Frailty Index (mFI, 11 items) and/or simplified FI (sFI, five items) predicted PCs.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, the Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov from inception to 31 May 2020. Studies reporting relationships between the investigated outcomes and patients' frailty were included. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) through a random effect model by using Revman 5.4.
RESULTS
Frailty, assessed by different tools, was associated with a significantly higher rate of 30-day (OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-1.89) and 90-day (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14-3.82) mPCs and 30-day tPCs (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.76-2.52). A mFI of ≥2 was associated with a higher rate of 30-day mPCs (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.69-1.89) and greater 30-day mortality (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.10-5.49). A pre-planned post hoc analysis also revealed that a sFI of ≥3 was predictive of mPCs (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.12-5.12).
CONCLUSIONS
Frailty assessment may help to predict PCs and mortality in patients undergoing major urological surgery. Either a mFi of ≥2 or sFI of ≥3 should be considered potential 'red flags' for preoperative risk assessment and decision-making. There is not enough evidence to confirm the necessity to perform frailty assessment in minor urological surgery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
507-517Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International.
Références
Cui HW, Turney BW, Griffiths J. The preoperative assessment and optimization of patients undergoing major urological surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2017; 18: 54
Owens WD. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System in not a risk classification system. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 378
Aronson WL, McAuliffe MS, Miller K. Variability in the American Society of anesthesiologists physical status classification scale. AANA J 2003; 71: 265-74
Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1217-20
Masago T, Morizane S, Honda M et al. Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk of radical cystectomy using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation. Cent European J Urol 2015; 68: 270-6
Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Hall BL. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 1009-16
Parker DC, Handorf E, Smaldone MC, Uzzo RG, Pitt H, Reese AC. Race and postoperative complications following urologic cancer surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis. Urol Oncol 2017; 35: 670.e1-e6
Hamel MB, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Daley J. Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 424-9
Bettelli G. Preoperative evaluation in geriatric surgery: comorbidity, functional status and pharmacological history. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 637-46
Moro FD, Morlacco A, Motterle G, Barbieri L, Zattoni F. Frailty and elderly in urology: Is there an impact on post-operative complications? Cent European J Urol 2017; 70: 197-205
Aceto P, Antonelli Incalzi R, Bettelli G et al. Perioperative management of elderly patients: recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1647-73
Voskamp MJ, Vermeer M, Molijn GJ, Cornel EB. The usefulness of the modified frailty index for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy. Curr Urol 2020; 14: 32-7
Suskind AM, Walter LC, Jin C et al. The impact of frailty on complications in patients undergoing common urologic procedures; a study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database. BJU Int 2016; 117: 836-42
Suskind AM, Jin C, Walter LC, Finlayson E. Frailty and the role of obliterative versus reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse; a national study. J Urol 2017; 197: 1502-6
Burg ML, Clifford TG, Bazargani ST et al. Frailty as a predictor of complications after radical cystectomy: a prospective study of various preoperative assessments. Urol Oncol 2019; 37: 40-7
Amin KA, Lee UJ, Jin C et al. A national study demonstrating the need for improved frailty indices for preoperative risk assessment of common urologic procedures. Urology 2019; 132: 87-93
Sathianathen NJ, Jarosek S, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D, Konety BR. A simplified frailty index to predict outcomes after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5: 658-63
Chappidi MR, Kates M, Patel HD et al. Frailty as a marker of adverse outcomes in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2016; 34: 256.e1-6
Woldu SL, Sanli O, Clinton TN, Lotan Y. Validating the predictors of outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2019; 125: 223-31
Meng X, Press B, Renson A et al. Discriminative ability of commonly used indexes to predict adverse outcomes after radical cystectomy: comparison of demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists, Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Modified Frailty Index. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16: e843-50
Lascano D, Pak JS, Kates M et al. Validation of a frailty index in patients undergoing curative surgery for urologic malignancy and comparison with other risk stratification tools. Urol Oncol 2015; 33: 426.e1-12
Isharwal S, Johanning JM, Dwyer JG, Schimid KK, LaGrange CA. Preoperative frailty predicts postoperative complications and mortality in urology patients. World J Urol 2017; 35: 21-6
Rosiello G, Palumbo C, Knipper S et al. Preoperative frailty predicts adverse short-term postoperative outcomes in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23: 573-80
Pearl JA, Patil D, Filson CP et al. Patient frailty and discharge disposition following radical cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15: e615-21
De Nunzio C, Cicione A, Izquierdo L et al. Multicenter analysis of postoperative complications in octogenarians after radical cystectomy and ureterocutaneostomy: the role of the frailty index. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17: 402-7
Oresanya LB, Lyons WL, Finlayson E. Preoperative assessment of the older patient: a narrative review. JAMA 2014; 311: 2110-20
Shem Tov L, Matot I. Frailty and anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30: 409-17
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: M146-56
Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal 2001; 1: 323-36
Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 901-8
Mayr R, Fritsche HM, Zeman F et al. Sarcopenia predicts 90-day mortality and postoperative complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. World J Urol 2018; 36: 1201-7
Fukushima H, Nakanishi Y, Kataoka M, Tobisu K, Koga F. Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Cancer Med 2016; 5: 2213-20
Mason RJ, Boorjian SA, Bhindi B et al. The association between sarcopenia and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16: e629-36
Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173: 489-95
Eamer G, Al-Amoodi MJ, Holroyd-Leduc J, Rolfson DB, Warkentin LM, Khadaroo RG. Review of risk assessment tools to predict morbidity and mortality in elderly surgical patients. Am J Surg 2018; 216: 585-94
Shinall MC Jr, Arya S, Youk A et al. Association of preoperative patient frailty and operative stress with postoperative mortality. JAMA Surg 2019; 155: e194620
Mohile SG, Bylow K, Dale W et al. A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey-13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation. Cancer 2007; 109: 802-10
O'Neill BR, Batterham AM, Hollingsworth AC, Durrand JW, Danjoux GR. Do first impressions count? Frailty judged by initial clinical impression predicts medium-term mortality in vascular surgical patients. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 684-91
Pangilinan J, Quanstrom K, Bridge M, Walter LC, Finlayson E, Suskind AM. The timed up and go test as a measure of frailty in urologic practice. Urology 2017; 106: 32-8
Griffiths R, Beech F, Brown A et al. Peri-operative care of the elderly 2014: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(Suppl 1): 81-98
Partridge JS, Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(Suppl 1): 8-16
Kristjansson SR, Nesbakken A, Jordhøy MS et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment can predict complications in elderly patients after elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010; 76: 208-17
Psutka SP, Barocas DA, Catto JW et al. Staging the host: personalizing risk assessment for radical cystectomy patients. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1: 292-304
Jensen BT, Lauridsen SV, Jensen JB. Prehabilitation for major abdominal urologic oncology surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2018; 28: 243-50
Santa Mina D, Hilton WJ, Matthew AG et al. Prehabilitation for radical prostatectomy: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Surg Oncol 2018; 27: 289-98
van Walree IC, Scheepers E, van Huis-Tanja L et al. A systematic review on the association of the G8 with geriatric assessment, prognosis and course of treatment in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10: 847-58
Hamaker ME, Jonker JM, de Rooij SE, Vos AG, Smorenburg CH, van Munster BC. Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: e437-44
Momota M, Hatakeyama S, Soma O et al. Geriatric 8 screening of frailty in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2020; 27: 642-8
Soma O, Hatakeyama S, Okamoto T et al. Multicenter prospective study validating the efficacy of a quantitative assessment tool for frailty in patients with urological cancers. Med Oncol 2019; 36: 88