Performance of Plasma Adenosine as a Biomarker for Predicting Cardiovascular Risk.
Adenosine
/ blood
Aged
Biomarkers
/ blood
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ blood
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Disease Risk Factors
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
/ epidemiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ statistics & numerical data
Prospective Studies
Registries
/ statistics & numerical data
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Stroke
/ epidemiology
Journal
Clinical and translational science
ISSN: 1752-8062
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474067
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
20
05
2020
accepted:
23
07
2020
pubmed:
3
12
2020
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
2
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adenosine boasts promising preclinical and clinical data supporting a vital role in modulating vascular homeostasis. Its widespread use as a diagnostic and therapeutic agent have been limited by its short half-life and complex biology, though adenosine-modulators have shown promise in improving vascular healing. Moreover, circulating adenosine has shown promise in predicting cardiovascular (CV) events. We sought to delineate whether circulating plasma adenosine levels predict CV events in patients undergoing invasive assessment for coronary artery disease. Patients undergoing invasive angiography had clinical data prospectively recorded in the Cardiovascular and Percutaneous ClInical TriALs (CAPITAL) revascularization registry and blood samples collected in the CAPITAL Biobank from which adenosine levels were quantified. Tertile-based analysis was used to assess prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident). Secondary analyses included MACE subgroups, clinical subgroups and adenosine levels. There were 1,815 patients undergoing angiography who had blood collected with adenosine quantified in 1,323. Of those quantified, 51.0% were revascularized and 7.3% experienced MACE in 12 months of follow-up. Tertile-based analysis failed to demonstrate any stratification of MACE rates (log rank, P = 0.83), when comparing low-to-middle (hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.78, P = 0.70) or low-to-high adenosine tertiles (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.56-1.57, P = 0.84). In adjusted analysis, adenosine similarly failed to predict MACE. Finally, adenosine did not predict outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome nor in those revascularized or treated medically. Plasma adenosine levels do not predict subsequent CV outcomes or aid in patient risk stratification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33264483
doi: 10.1111/cts.12886
pmc: PMC7877863
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Adenosine
K72T3FS567
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
354-361Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989 Jan;45(1):80-4
pubmed: 2910640
Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 25;101(2):191-5
pubmed: 15882662
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007 May;27(5):1004-13
pubmed: 17332491
Circulation. 1999 Mar 23;99(11):1397-9
pubmed: 10086958
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 11;63(9):872-7
pubmed: 24291273
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Apr;12(4):265-86
pubmed: 23535933
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 18;75(6):590-604
pubmed: 32057373
Clin Chim Acta. 1994 Oct 14;230(1):63-8
pubmed: 7850994
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Oct;11(10):1867-76
pubmed: 23890048
Int J Cardiol. 1996 Sep;56(1):17-27
pubmed: 8891801
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6457-61
pubmed: 1631143
Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2019;19(2):109-131
pubmed: 30318008
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1248-52
pubmed: 11028479
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000 Sep;36(3):351-60
pubmed: 10975593
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1998 Jul;12(3):307-9
pubmed: 9784911
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 31;5(6):
pubmed: 27247332
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012228
pubmed: 31379241
Circulation. 1999 Mar 23;99(11):1422-5
pubmed: 10086964
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 27;11(16):1576-1586
pubmed: 29805112
Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618-e651
pubmed: 30571511
Br J Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;173(7):1163-78
pubmed: 26758983
Circulation. 1997 Mar 18;95(6):1363-5
pubmed: 9118500
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Jun;120(6):610-614
pubmed: 28052578
Thromb Res. 2020 Jul;191:125-133
pubmed: 32447094
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Mar;28(3):s39-42
pubmed: 18174451
Vascular. 2015 Apr;23(2):124-31
pubmed: 24803551
J Neurol Sci. 1997 May 29;148(2):153-61
pubmed: 9129111
Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Sep 1;59(3):678-84
pubmed: 14499869
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):231-40
pubmed: 18199862
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 27;20(23):
pubmed: 31783510
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;17(2):164-72
pubmed: 21697355
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 May;1783(5):673-94
pubmed: 18302942
Circulation. 2005 Nov 1;112(18):2826-32
pubmed: 16246948
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 22;54(13):1123-30
pubmed: 19761931