Socioeconomic inequalities in the place of death in urban small areas of three Mediterranean cities.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cities
/ epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Death
Female
Healthcare Disparities
/ economics
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Residence Characteristics
/ statistics & numerical data
Socioeconomic Factors
Spain
/ epidemiology
Urban Population
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Inequalities
Mortality
Palliative care
Place of death
Residential facilities
Small-area analysis
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 12 2020
03 12 2020
Historique:
received:
17
08
2020
accepted:
11
11
2020
entrez:
4
12
2020
pubmed:
5
12
2020
medline:
30
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dying at home is the most frequent preference of patients with advanced chronic conditions, their caregivers, and the general population. However, most deaths continue to occur in hospitals. The objective of this study was to analyse the socioeconomic inequalities in the place of death in urban areas of Mediterranean cities during the period 2010-2015, and to assess if such inequalities are related to palliative or non-palliative conditions. This is a cross-sectional study of the population aged 15 years or over. The response variable was the place of death (home, hospital, residential care). The explanatory variables were: sex, age, marital status, country of birth, basic cause of death coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, and the deprivation level for each census tract based on a deprivation index calculated using 5 socioeconomic indicators. Multinomial logistic regression models were adjusted in order to analyse the association between the place of death and the explanatory variables. We analysed a total of 60,748 deaths, 58.5% occurred in hospitals, 32.4% at home, and 9.1% in residential care. Death in hospital was 80% more frequent than at home while death in a nursing home was more than 70% lower than at home. All the variables considered were significantly associated with the place of death, except country of birth, which was not significantly associated with death in residential care. In hospital, the deprivation level of the census tract presented a significant association (p < 0.05) so that the probability of death in hospital vs. home increased as the deprivation level increased. The deprivation level was also significantly associated with death in residential care, but there was no clear trend, showing a more complex association pattern. No significant interaction for deprivation level with cause of death (palliative, not palliative) was detected. The probability of dying in hospital, as compared to dying at home, increases as the socioeconomic deprivation of the urban area of residence rises, both for palliative and non-palliative causes. Further qualitative research is required to explore the needs and preferences of low-income families who have a terminally-ill family member and, in particular, their attitudes towards home-based and hospital-based death.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Dying at home is the most frequent preference of patients with advanced chronic conditions, their caregivers, and the general population. However, most deaths continue to occur in hospitals. The objective of this study was to analyse the socioeconomic inequalities in the place of death in urban areas of Mediterranean cities during the period 2010-2015, and to assess if such inequalities are related to palliative or non-palliative conditions.
METHODS
This is a cross-sectional study of the population aged 15 years or over. The response variable was the place of death (home, hospital, residential care). The explanatory variables were: sex, age, marital status, country of birth, basic cause of death coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, and the deprivation level for each census tract based on a deprivation index calculated using 5 socioeconomic indicators. Multinomial logistic regression models were adjusted in order to analyse the association between the place of death and the explanatory variables.
RESULTS
We analysed a total of 60,748 deaths, 58.5% occurred in hospitals, 32.4% at home, and 9.1% in residential care. Death in hospital was 80% more frequent than at home while death in a nursing home was more than 70% lower than at home. All the variables considered were significantly associated with the place of death, except country of birth, which was not significantly associated with death in residential care. In hospital, the deprivation level of the census tract presented a significant association (p < 0.05) so that the probability of death in hospital vs. home increased as the deprivation level increased. The deprivation level was also significantly associated with death in residential care, but there was no clear trend, showing a more complex association pattern. No significant interaction for deprivation level with cause of death (palliative, not palliative) was detected.
CONCLUSIONS
The probability of dying in hospital, as compared to dying at home, increases as the socioeconomic deprivation of the urban area of residence rises, both for palliative and non-palliative causes. Further qualitative research is required to explore the needs and preferences of low-income families who have a terminally-ill family member and, in particular, their attitudes towards home-based and hospital-based death.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33272290
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01324-y
pii: 10.1186/s12939-020-01324-y
pmc: PMC7713024
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
214Références
PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 23;16(4):e1002782
pubmed: 31013279
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 4;:
pubmed: 30723074
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jan;70(1):17-24
pubmed: 26202254
BMJ. 2009 Aug 04;339:b2732
pubmed: 19654184
Br J Cancer. 2015 Nov 3;113(9):1397-404
pubmed: 26325102
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2315-22
pubmed: 21087225
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;1(3):310-4
pubmed: 24653476
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 09;13:235
pubmed: 26449231
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep;9(3):358
pubmed: 30944122
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 19;6(9):e012340
pubmed: 27645556
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jul 20;112(29-30):496-504
pubmed: 26249252
Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;27(1):68-75
pubmed: 22492481
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 08;9(4):e93762
pubmed: 24714736
Gac Sanit. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):179-87
pubmed: 18579042
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;8(4):428-430
pubmed: 27934630
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):852-859.e2
pubmed: 29983361
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Aug 1;29(4):608-615
pubmed: 30601984
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 12;16(1):72
pubmed: 29233123
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4733-4744
pubmed: 30972644
Health Policy. 2015 Jan;119(1):100-6
pubmed: 25481024
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 1;30(22):2783-7
pubmed: 22734023
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;17(1-2):62-8
pubmed: 26473583
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 15;12:7
pubmed: 23414145
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):891-901
pubmed: 29235927
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 May;69(5):432-41
pubmed: 25631857
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):900-925
pubmed: 31187687
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;:
pubmed: 29856091
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):49-58
pubmed: 23695827
J Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;16(12):1610-3
pubmed: 24206007
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):
pubmed: 32610538
Health Place. 2010 Jul;16(4):703-11
pubmed: 20399699
Palliat Med. 2013 Oct;27(9):840-6
pubmed: 23737036
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):691-6
pubmed: 26218578
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2006-2015
pubmed: 22345118
Health Policy. 2006 Oct;78(2-3):319-29
pubmed: 16343687
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2267-73
pubmed: 20351336
Health Policy. 2012 Jun;106(1):23-8
pubmed: 22494526
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(8):3313-7
pubmed: 25921137
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2020 Apr 20;43(1):69-80
pubmed: 32176217
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):515-21
pubmed: 16467346