Association Between Quality of Life and Procedural Outcome After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2020
01 12 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
12
2020
pubmed:
5
12
2020
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Catheter ablation is effective in reducing atrial fibrillation (AF), but the association of ablation for AF with quality of life is unclear. To evaluate whether the procedural outcome of ablation for AF is associated with quality of life (QOL) measures. This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation-Part II (STAR AF II) prospective randomized clinical trial, which compared 3 strategies for ablation of persistent AF. This analysis included 549 of the 589 patients enrolled in the trial who underwent ablation. Enrollment occurred at 35 centers in Europe, Canada, Australia, China, and Korea from November 2010 to July 2012. Data for the current study were analyzed on December 11, 2019. Patients underwent AF ablation with 1 of 3 ablation strategies: (1) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), (2) PVI plus complex fractionated electrograms, or (3) PVI plus linear lesions. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months after ablation for AF using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the EuroQol Health-Related Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level questionnaire. Scores were also converted to a physical health component score (PCS) and a mental health component score (MCS). Individual AF burden was calculated by the total time with AF from Holter monitors and the percentage of transtelephonic monitor recordings showing AF. Among the 549 patients included in this secondary analysis, QOL was assessed in 466 (85%) at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months after ablation for AF. The mean (SD) age of the study population was 60 (9) years; 434 (79%) individuals were men, and 417 (76%) had continuous AF for 6 months or more before ablation. The AF burden significantly decreased from a mean (SD) of 82% (36%) before ablation to 6.6% (23%) after ablation (P < .001). Significant improvements in mean (SD) PCS (68.3 [20.7] to 82.5 [18.6]) and MCS (35.3 [8.6] to 37.5 [7.6]) occurred 18 months after ablation (P < .05 for both). Significant QOL improvement occurred in all 3 study arms and regardless of AF recurrence, defined as AF episodes lasting more than 30 seconds: for no recurrence, mean (SD) PCS increased from 66.5 (20.9) to 79.1 (19.4) and MCS from 35.3 (8.7) to 37.7 (7.7); for recurrence, mean (SD) PCS increased from 70.2 (20.4) to 86.4 (16.8) and MCS from 35.3 (8.6) to 37.1 (7.4) (P < .05 for all). When outcome was defined by AF burden reduction, in patients with less than 70% reduction in AF burden, the increase in PCS was significantly less than in those with greater than 70% reduction, and only 3 of 8 subscales showed significant improvement. In this secondary analysis, decreases in AF burden after ablation for AF were significantly associated with improvements in QOL. Quality of life changes were significantly associated with the percentage of AF burden reduction after ablation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01203748.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33275151
pii: 2773536
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25473
pmc: PMC7718606
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01203748']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2025473Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Sep;27(9):1277-83
pubmed: 15461719
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22
pubmed: 25946280
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):1292-301
pubmed: 16403161
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Nov;22(11):1634-9
pubmed: 10598967
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):149-56
pubmed: 23266597
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):121-7
pubmed: 21914021
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):215-21
pubmed: 25567068
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 24;7(5):
pubmed: 29478027
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1261-1274
pubmed: 30874766
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1275-1285
pubmed: 30874716
JAMA. 2019 Mar 19;321(11):1059-1068
pubmed: 30874754
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):455-460
pubmed: 23265334
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1303-9
pubmed: 11028487
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e275-e444
pubmed: 28506916
Heart. 2001 Feb;85(2):171-8
pubmed: 11156667
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Oct;29(10):1211-7
pubmed: 23988341
Heart. 2017 Mar;103(5):368-376
pubmed: 27566295
Circulation. 2019 Nov 26;140(22):1779-1788
pubmed: 31630538
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jul 18;3(4):
pubmed: 25037195
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 25;55(21):2308-16
pubmed: 20488300
Am Heart J. 2012 Jul;164(1):1-6.e6
pubmed: 22795275