The Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS): a two-phase evaluation study.


Journal

Endoscopy
ISSN: 1438-8812
Titre abrégé: Endoscopy
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0215166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
aheadofprint: 07 12 2020
pubmed: 8 12 2020
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 7 12 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To date, no scale has been validated to assess bubbles associated with bowel preparation. This study aimed to develop and assess the reliability of a novel scale - the Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS). This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study with two online evaluation phases of 45 randomly distributed still colonoscopy images (15 per scale grade). Observers assessed images twice, 2 weeks apart, using CEBuS (CEBuS-0 - no or minimal bubbles, covering < 5 % of the surface; CEBuS-1 - bubbles covering 5 %-50 %; CEBuS-2 - bubbles covering > 50 %) and reporting the clinical action (do nothing; wash with water; wash with simethicone). CEBuS provided high levels of agreement both in evaluation Phase 1 (4 experts) and Phase 2 (6 experts and 13 non-experts), with almost perfect intraobserver reliability: kappa 0.82 (95 % confidence interval 0.75-0.88) and 0.86 (0.85-0.88); interobserver agreement - intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.83 (0.73-0.89) and 0.90 (0.86-0.94). Previous endoscopic experience had no influence on agreement among experts vs. non-experts: kappa 0.86 (0.80-0.91) vs. 0.87 (0.84-0.89) and ICC 0.91 (0.87-0.94) vs. 0.90 (0.86-0.94), respectively. Interobserver agreement on clinical action was ICC 0.63 (0.43-0.78) in Phase 1 and 0.77 (0.68-0.84) in Phase 2. Absolute agreement on clinical action per scale grade was 85 % (82-88) for CEBuS-0, 21 % (16-26) for CEBuS-1, and 74 % (70-78) for CEBuS-2. CEBuS proved to be a reliable instrument to standardize the evaluation of colonic bubbles during colonoscopy. Assessment in daily practice is warranted.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To date, no scale has been validated to assess bubbles associated with bowel preparation. This study aimed to develop and assess the reliability of a novel scale - the Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS).
METHODS
This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study with two online evaluation phases of 45 randomly distributed still colonoscopy images (15 per scale grade). Observers assessed images twice, 2 weeks apart, using CEBuS (CEBuS-0 - no or minimal bubbles, covering < 5 % of the surface; CEBuS-1 - bubbles covering 5 %-50 %; CEBuS-2 - bubbles covering > 50 %) and reporting the clinical action (do nothing; wash with water; wash with simethicone).
RESULTS
CEBuS provided high levels of agreement both in evaluation Phase 1 (4 experts) and Phase 2 (6 experts and 13 non-experts), with almost perfect intraobserver reliability: kappa 0.82 (95 % confidence interval 0.75-0.88) and 0.86 (0.85-0.88); interobserver agreement - intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.83 (0.73-0.89) and 0.90 (0.86-0.94). Previous endoscopic experience had no influence on agreement among experts vs. non-experts: kappa 0.86 (0.80-0.91) vs. 0.87 (0.84-0.89) and ICC 0.91 (0.87-0.94) vs. 0.90 (0.86-0.94), respectively. Interobserver agreement on clinical action was ICC 0.63 (0.43-0.78) in Phase 1 and 0.77 (0.68-0.84) in Phase 2. Absolute agreement on clinical action per scale grade was 85 % (82-88) for CEBuS-0, 21 % (16-26) for CEBuS-1, and 74 % (70-78) for CEBuS-2.
CONCLUSION
CEBuS proved to be a reliable instrument to standardize the evaluation of colonic bubbles during colonoscopy. Assessment in daily practice is warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33285583
doi: 10.1055/a-1331-4325
doi:

Substances chimiques

Simethicone 8050-81-5

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

45-51

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Filipe Taveira (F)

Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Cesare Hassan (C)

Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Michal F Kaminski (MF)

Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Thierry Ponchon (T)

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.

Robert Benamouzig (R)

Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Avicenne (APHP), Bobigny, France.

Marek Bugajski (M)

Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Flore de Castelbajac (F)

Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Avicenne (APHP), Bobigny, France.

Paola Cesaro (P)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Hasnae Chergui (H)

Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Avicenne (APHP), Bobigny, France.

Loredana Goran (L)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University Bucharest, Romania.

Leonardo Minelli Grazioli (L)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Martin Janičko (M)

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia.

Wladyslaw Januszewicz (W)

Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.

Laura Lamonaca (L)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy.

Jamila Lenz (J)

Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.

Lucian Negreanu (L)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University Bucharest, Romania.

Alessandro Repici (A)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy.

Cristiano Spada (C)

Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Marco Spadaccini (M)

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Rozzano, Lombardia, Italy.

Monica State (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University Bucharest, Romania.

Jakub Szlak (J)

Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Eduard Veseliny (E)

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia.

Mário Dinis-Ribeiro (M)

Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.
Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal.

Miguel Areia (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH