Risk-adapted strategy or universal multimodal approach for PONV prophylaxis?

The issue of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains important in surgical practice, contributing to patient distress, slower recovery, and increased use of healthcare resources. Many surgical patients report it to be a worse problem than pain. Numerous findings of research indicate that PONV significantly affects patients' well-being and is among the important determinants of patient satisfaction with perioperative care. Numerous investigations have confirmed the efficacy of combining pharmacological interventions indicating that PONV is a clinical complication that is in principle avoidable. Nonetheless, PONV continues to be bothersome for too many patients. Thus, perhaps the biggest challenge across the field is to achieve a uniformly high standard of PONV management using the currently available resources. Although a risk-adapted approach has been advocated in the past, the current trend incorporated in clinical guidelines support a more liberal approach of multimodal antiemetic prevention. The current article emphasizes pros and cons of the various approaches to PONV prophylaxis and depicts most promising strategies to achieve a "PONV-free hospital."

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest PK acted as clinical investigator in clinical trials on PONV and received patient-related fees to conduct the studies. He is also the coauthor of the cited consensus statements on PONV published by the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) and American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER).