Glucose-lactose mixture feeds in industry-like conditions: a gene regulatory network analysis on the hyperproducing Trichoderma reesei strain Rut-C30.
Carbon sources
Cellulases
Data science
Fed-batch fermentation
Gene regulatory network
Transcriptome
Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Dec 2020
10 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
accepted:
25
11
2020
entrez:
11
12
2020
pubmed:
12
12
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose molecules into simpler sugars such as glucose is part of the second generation biofuel production process. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates is usually performed by enzymes produced and secreted by the fungus Trichoderma reesei. Studies identifying transcription factors involved in the regulation of cellulase production have been conducted but no overview of the whole regulation network is available. A transcriptomic approach with mixtures of glucose and lactose, used as a substrate for cellulase induction, was used to help us decipher missing parts in the network of T. reesei Rut-C30. Experimental results on the Rut-C30 hyperproducing strain confirmed the impact of sugar mixtures on the enzymatic cocktail composition. The transcriptomic study shows a temporal regulation of the main transcription factors and a lactose concentration impact on the transcriptional profile. A gene regulatory network built using BRANE Cut software reveals three sub-networks related to i) a positive correlation between lactose concentration and cellulase production, ii) a particular dependence of the lactose onto the β-glucosidase regulation and iii) a negative regulation of the development process and growth. This work is the first investigating a transcriptomic study regarding the effects of pure and mixed carbon sources in a fed-batch mode. Our study expose a co-orchestration of xyr1, clr2 and ace3 for cellulase and hemicellulase induction and production, a fine regulation of the β-glucosidase and a decrease of growth in favor of cellulase production. These conclusions provide us with potential targets for further genetic engineering leading to better cellulase-producing strains in industry-like conditions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose molecules into simpler sugars such as glucose is part of the second generation biofuel production process. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates is usually performed by enzymes produced and secreted by the fungus Trichoderma reesei. Studies identifying transcription factors involved in the regulation of cellulase production have been conducted but no overview of the whole regulation network is available. A transcriptomic approach with mixtures of glucose and lactose, used as a substrate for cellulase induction, was used to help us decipher missing parts in the network of T. reesei Rut-C30.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Experimental results on the Rut-C30 hyperproducing strain confirmed the impact of sugar mixtures on the enzymatic cocktail composition. The transcriptomic study shows a temporal regulation of the main transcription factors and a lactose concentration impact on the transcriptional profile. A gene regulatory network built using BRANE Cut software reveals three sub-networks related to i) a positive correlation between lactose concentration and cellulase production, ii) a particular dependence of the lactose onto the β-glucosidase regulation and iii) a negative regulation of the development process and growth.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This work is the first investigating a transcriptomic study regarding the effects of pure and mixed carbon sources in a fed-batch mode. Our study expose a co-orchestration of xyr1, clr2 and ace3 for cellulase and hemicellulase induction and production, a fine regulation of the β-glucosidase and a decrease of growth in favor of cellulase production. These conclusions provide us with potential targets for further genetic engineering leading to better cellulase-producing strains in industry-like conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33302864
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07281-8
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-07281-8
pmc: PMC7731781
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cellulase
EC 3.2.1.4
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Lactose
J2B2A4N98G
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
885Subventions
Organisme : France G?nomique national infrastructure
ID : ANR-10-INBS-0009
Références
Fungal Genet Biol. 2012 May;49(5):388-97
pubmed: 22425594
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 10;10:750
pubmed: 31024511
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Dec;101(24):9815-8
pubmed: 20708927
BMC Genomics. 2008 Jul 11;9:327
pubmed: 18620557
Genetics. 1999 May;152(1):191-9
pubmed: 10224253
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Jun 28;9:132
pubmed: 27354857
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Aug 31;84(18):
pubmed: 29980558
J Proteome Res. 2013 Apr 5;12(4):1808-19
pubmed: 23461488
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Dec;102(24):11115-20
pubmed: 21507624
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018 May-Jun;15(3):850-860
pubmed: 28368827
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Sep 7;10:209
pubmed: 28912831
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Jun;103(11):4511-4523
pubmed: 30982107
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 May 02;6(1):62
pubmed: 23638967
Curr Genomics. 2016 Apr;17(2):119-31
pubmed: 27226768
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Jan;247:676-683
pubmed: 30060399
J Biol Chem. 2013 Nov 15;288(46):32861-72
pubmed: 24085297
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Sep 21;5(1):73
pubmed: 22998985
Microb Cell Fact. 2019 Jan 18;18(1):9
pubmed: 30657063
Trends Genet. 1995 Jan;11(1):12-7
pubmed: 7900189
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Apr 9;12:81
pubmed: 31007715
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jun 1;97(2):287-96
pubmed: 17058283
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jan;100(2):769-79
pubmed: 26481618
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(10):1589-603
pubmed: 18802440
Microb Cell Fact. 2016 Jun 10;15(1):106
pubmed: 27287427
Eukaryot Cell. 2014 Aug;13(8):1001-13
pubmed: 24879125
BMC Genomics. 2010 Jul 19;11:441
pubmed: 20642838
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Aug;10(8):1100-9
pubmed: 21666072
Microb Cell Fact. 2012 Oct 04;11:134
pubmed: 23035824
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Nov;10(11):1527-35
pubmed: 21890820
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 6;107(14):6286-91
pubmed: 20308593
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jan 28;7(1):14
pubmed: 24472375
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Apr 14;8:66
pubmed: 25883682
Mol Microbiol. 1995 May;16(4):687-97
pubmed: 7476163
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Sep 30;82(20):6247-6257
pubmed: 27520818
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Sep 23;9:203
pubmed: 27688806
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 1;28(11):1542-3
pubmed: 22492314
Fungal Genet Biol. 2009 Aug;46(8):564-74
pubmed: 19393758
PLoS One. 2013 May 08;8(5):e62631
pubmed: 23690947
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Sep;29(4):719-39
pubmed: 16102600
Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2018 Aug 20;5:15
pubmed: 30151221
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2014 Dec;67:17-26
pubmed: 25442944
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7397-402
pubmed: 22532664
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jan;109(1):92-9
pubmed: 21830204
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Jun 12;10:152
pubmed: 28616076
BMC Genomics. 2019 Jun 12;20(1):485
pubmed: 31189469
Mycobiology. 2010 Dec;38(4):229-37
pubmed: 23956662
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16151-6
pubmed: 19805272
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Sep 01;2:19
pubmed: 19723296
Fungal Biol. 2018 Jun;122(6):570-582
pubmed: 29801802
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Aug 06;8:112
pubmed: 26246855
Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106
pubmed: 20979621
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 04;16:368
pubmed: 26537179
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W119-27
pubmed: 18495751
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 May 17;6(1):79
pubmed: 23680258
Stud Mycol. 2013 Mar 15;74(1):1-29
pubmed: 23450714
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Feb 01;8:35
pubmed: 17270037
J Fungi (Basel). 2018 Jul 11;4(3):
pubmed: 29997371
PLoS Biol. 2007 Jan;5(1):e8
pubmed: 17214507
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jan;69(1):56-65
pubmed: 12513977
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Sep 09;6(1):127
pubmed: 24016404
Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Dec;5(12):2128-37
pubmed: 17056741
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Dec 12;7(1):173
pubmed: 25550711
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Dec;97(24):10453-67
pubmed: 24113825
FEBS J. 2014 Sep;281(17):3894-903
pubmed: 25041335
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Apr;102(8):3739-3753
pubmed: 29511847
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 15;9(8):796-804
pubmed: 22796662
Microb Cell Fact. 2012 May 30;11:70
pubmed: 22646695
Mol Genet Genomics. 2001 Sep;266(1):56-63
pubmed: 11589578
Microbiology (Reading). 2012 Jan;158(Pt 1):58-68
pubmed: 21998163
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Jul 3;10:170
pubmed: 28690679
Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Jun 24;251(4):451-60
pubmed: 8709949
J Biol Chem. 2019 Nov 29;294(48):18435-18450
pubmed: 31501242
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 11;7(1):17346
pubmed: 29229981
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 May;26(5):553-60
pubmed: 18454138
J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 29;276(26):24309-14
pubmed: 11304525
mSystems. 2019 Jun 18;4(4):
pubmed: 31213522
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):2910-24
pubmed: 15932985
Fungal Genet Biol. 2016 Jan;86:91-102
pubmed: 26724278
Mol Microbiol. 2017 Jul;105(1):65-83
pubmed: 28378498