Developing an Advanced Alternative Payment Model for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Journal
Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 2154-4212
Titre abrégé: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2021
01 04 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
15
12
2020
medline:
4
1
2022
entrez:
14
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Historically, our health care system has been based on a fee-for-service model, which has resulted in high-cost and fragmented care. The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services is moving toward a paradigm in which health care providers are incentivized to provide cost-effective, coordinated, value-based care in an effort to control costs and ensure high-quality care for all patients. In 2015, the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate and the fee-for-service model, replacing them with a 2-track system: Merit-based Incentive Payment System and the advanced Alternative Payment Model (aAPM) system. In 2016, the American Urogynecologic Society Payment Reform Committee was created and tasked with developing aAPMs for pelvic floor disorders. The purpose of this article is to describe the stress urinary incontinence aAPM framework, the data selected and associated data plan, and some of the challenges considered and encountered during the aAPM development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33315626
pii: 01436319-202104000-00001
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000997
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-222Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Références
Ünlü M, Üstüner I, Güven ESG, et al. Urinary incontinence in premenopausal women: prevalence, risk factors and impact on quality of life. LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms 2014;6(3):157–161.
Markland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, et al. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol 2011;186(2):589–593.
Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, et al. Urinary incontinence in women: a review. JAMA 2017;318(16):1592–1604.
Chong EC, Khan AA, Anger JT. The financial burden of stress urinary incontinence among women in the United States. Curr Urol Rep 2011;12(5):358–362.
Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Kawasaki A, et al. Long-term outcomes after stress urinary incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(1):83–90.
Rogo-Gupta L, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, et al; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries, 2002–2007. Urology 2013;82(1):38–41.
Quality Payment Program. Available at: https://qpp.cms.gov/apms/overview. Accessed September 2, 2019.
MIPS. Alternative Payment Models. Available from: https://qpp.cms.gov/apms/mips-apms. Accessed September 2, 2019.
ACQUIRE. Measures. Available at: https://www.augs.org/assets/1/6/AQUIRE_Measures_List.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2019.
Pulliam SJ, Morgan DM, Guaderrama N, et al. Differences in patterns of preoperative assessment between high, intermediate, and low volume surgeons when performing hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22:7–10.
American Urogynecologic Society and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion: evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014;20(5):248–251.
Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol 2017;198(4):875–883.
Norton PA, Nager CW, Brubaker L, et al; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. The cost of preoperative urodynamics: a secondary analysis of the ValUE trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2016;35:81–84.
Rama A. Policy Research Perspectives: Payment and Delivery in 2018: Participation in Medical Homes and Accountable Care Organization on the Rise While Fee-for-Service Revenue Remains Stable. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-09/prp-care-delivery-payment-models-2018.pdf.