Comparative transcriptomics indicates endogenous differences in detoxification capacity after formic acid treatment between honey bees and varroa mites.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 12 2020
14 12 2020
Historique:
received:
27
07
2020
accepted:
03
12
2020
entrez:
15
12
2020
pubmed:
16
12
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Formic acid (FA) has been used for decades to control Varroa destructor, one of the most important parasites of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. The rather unselective molecular mode of action of FA and its possible effects on honeybees have long been a concern of beekeepers, as it has undesirable side effects that affect the health of bee colonies. This study focuses on short-term transcriptomic changes as analysed by RNAseq in both larval and adult honey bees and in mites after FA treatment under applied conditions. Our study aims to identify those genes in honey bees and varroa mites differentially expressed upon a typical FA hive exposure scenario. Five detoxification-related genes were identified with significantly enhanced and one gene with significantly decreased expression under FA exposure. Regulated genes in our test setting included members of various cytochrome P450 subfamilies, a flavin-dependent monooxygenase and a cytosolic 10-formyltetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (FDH), known to be involved in formate metabolism in mammals. We were able to detect differences in the regulation of detoxification-associated genes between mites and honey bees as well as between the two different developmental stages of the honey bee. Additionally, we detected repressed regulation of Varroa genes involved in cellular respiration, suggesting mitochondrial dysfunction and supporting the current view on the mode of action of FA-inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. This study shows distinct cellular effects induced by FA on the global transcriptome of both host and parasite in comparison. Our expression data might help to identify possible differences in the affected metabolic pathways and thus make a first contribution to elucidate the mode of detoxification of FA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33318550
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79057-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-79057-9
pmc: PMC7736338
doi:
Substances chimiques
Formates
0
formic acid
0YIW783RG1
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21943Références
Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
pubmed: 12184808
J Invertebr Pathol. 1999 Jan;73(1):101-6
pubmed: 9878295
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(34):34730-34739
pubmed: 30324372
Genome Res. 2006 Nov;16(11):1414-21
pubmed: 17065612
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Dec;154(4):427-34
pubmed: 19737624
J Insect Physiol. 2014 Dec;71:177-90
pubmed: 25450567
J Biol Chem. 2006 Jul 7;281(27):18335-42
pubmed: 16627483
Genes Immun. 2005 Jun;6(4):279-84
pubmed: 15815687
Drug Metab Rev. 2002 Feb-May;34(1-2):17-35
pubmed: 11996009
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Oct;97(5):1509-12
pubmed: 15568336
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2013 Nov-Dec;68(11-12):509-21
pubmed: 24601089
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Sep 28;19(5):776-792
pubmed: 28334202
J Econ Entomol. 2004 Oct;97(5):1500-8
pubmed: 15568335
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 02;10(10):e0139841
pubmed: 26431171
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Sep;119(3):640-54
pubmed: 26176631
Insect Mol Biol. 2015 Oct;24(5):582-8
pubmed: 26190094
Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;106(3):357-87
pubmed: 15922018
Int J Mol Med. 2019 Jul;44(1):3-15
pubmed: 31115493
Brief Bioinform. 2011 May;12(3):280-7
pubmed: 21498551
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002 Nov 18;54(10):1271-94
pubmed: 12406645
Mol Pharmacol. 1989 Jun;35(6):745-50
pubmed: 2733692
Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991 Sep;69(3):157-63
pubmed: 1665561
J Chem Ecol. 2002 May;28(5):873-96
pubmed: 12049229
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):525-7
pubmed: 27043002
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W116-20
pubmed: 15980438
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2019 Dec;115:103247
pubmed: 31626952
J Insect Physiol. 2012 May;58(5):613-20
pubmed: 22212860
PLoS One. 2010 May 03;5(5):e10435
pubmed: 20454663
J Econ Entomol. 2005 Apr;98(2):267-73
pubmed: 15889712
Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14
pubmed: 20132535
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015 Aug;10:51-58
pubmed: 29588014
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1980 Jan 15;92(1):327-33
pubmed: 6243938
J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Jan;103 Suppl 1:S96-119
pubmed: 19909970
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 04;12:323
pubmed: 21816040
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 29;116(5):1792-1801
pubmed: 30647116
Insect Mol Biol. 2011 Jun;20(3):399-408
pubmed: 21435061
Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
pubmed: 16081474
J Biol Chem. 2003 Mar 7;278(10):8516-25
pubmed: 12496265
Front Physiol. 2018 Nov 15;9:1608
pubmed: 30498454
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995 Feb 20;317(1):275-84
pubmed: 7872795
J Proteome Res. 2013 Nov 1;12(11):4727-37
pubmed: 24090158
Genome Biol. 2015 Apr 24;16:76
pubmed: 25908251
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Feb;78(4):981-7
pubmed: 22179240
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2009;23(1-3):143-56
pubmed: 19255509
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1975 Nov 17;67(2):610-6
pubmed: 1020
Insect Mol Biol. 2018 Oct;27(5):661-674
pubmed: 29896786
Exp Appl Acarol. 2011 Sep;55(1):65-76
pubmed: 21442305
Ital J Food Saf. 2015 Sep 25;4(3):5364
pubmed: 27800411
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2020 Nov;170:104703
pubmed: 32980071
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2001 Feb;48(1):11-4
pubmed: 11254094
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994 Jan;308(1):254-7
pubmed: 8311461
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27;103(26):9832-7
pubmed: 16777962
Life Sci. 1994;54(22):PL395-9
pubmed: 8177005
Insect Mol Biol. 2006 Oct;15(5):615-36
pubmed: 17069637
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):8842-6
pubmed: 23630255
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 02;8(7):e68191
pubmed: 23844170
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31051
pubmed: 22319603