Adjusting for protein quality by food source may affect nutrient density metrics.
FSA-Ofcom
NRF index
Nutri-Score
PDCAAS
animal protein
nutrient profiling
plant protein
protein quality
Journal
Nutrition reviews
ISSN: 1753-4887
Titre abrégé: Nutr Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376405
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 09 2021
07 09 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
18
12
2020
medline:
15
10
2021
entrez:
17
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Methods to assess nutrient density of foods, commonly known as nutrient profiling (NP), typically include protein as a component. In this study, the goal was to apply a correction for protein quality by food source to selected NP algorithms. Analyses of 378 component foods of the Fred Hutch food frequency questionnaire showed that animal-source foods (ie, meat, eggs, and dairy) along with some soy products and nuts were the only foods that provided > 20% of the daily value (DV) of protein per 100 g or per 100 kcal. Most beans, pulses, legumes, grains, and vegetables provided <10% DV of protein per 100 g or per 100 kcal. Adjusting for protein quality using a simplified Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) had consequences for point-based NP models (namely, Nutri-Score) and for continuous nutrient density scores (namely, Nutrient Rich Foods). Quantitative methods that use protein content to capture nutrient density may require a protein-quality adjustment, especially when adapted for use in low- and middle-income countries where protein quality is an issue of public health concern.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33331638
pii: 6040621
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa117
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dietary Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1134-1144Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.