Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Versus Exercise Program in Runners With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Adult
Arthralgia
/ therapy
Exercise Therapy
/ methods
Female
Foot
/ physiology
Hip Joint
/ physiology
Humans
Knee Joint
Male
Manipulation, Osteopathic
/ methods
Pain Measurement
/ methods
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Physical Functional Performance
Pliability
/ physiology
Pressure
Range of Motion, Articular
/ physiology
Running
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
clinical trials
manual therapy
running sports
therapeutic modalities
Journal
Journal of sport rehabilitation
ISSN: 1543-3072
Titre abrégé: J Sport Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9206500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Dec 2020
17 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
11
03
2020
revised:
22
07
2020
accepted:
05
09
2020
pubmed:
18
12
2020
medline:
31
7
2021
entrez:
17
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The effects of an exercise program (EP) for the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) are well known. However, the effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) are unclear. To evaluate the effects of OMT versus EP on knee pain, functionality, plantar pressure in middle foot (PPMF), posterior thigh flexibility (PTF), and range of motion of hip extension in runners with PFPS. This is a randomized controlled trial. Human performance laboratory. A total of 82 runners with PFPS participated in this study. The participants were randomized into 3 groups: OMT, EP, and control group. The OMT group received joint manipulation and myofascial release in the lumbar spine, hip, sacroiliac joint, knee, and ankle regions. The EP group performed specific exercises for lower limbs. The control group received no intervention. The main evaluations were pain through the visual analog scale, functionality through the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, dynamic knee valgus through the step-down test, PPMF through static baropodometry, PTF through the sit and reach test, and range of motion through fleximetry. The evaluations were performed before the interventions, after the 6 interventions, and at 30-day follow-up. There was a significant pain decrease in the OMT and EP groups when compared with the control group. OMT group showed increased functionality, decreased PPMF, and increased PTF. The range of motion for hip extension increased only in the EP group. Both OMT and EP are effective in treating runners with PFPS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33333491
doi: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0108
pii: jsr.2020-0108
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM