Association of Burnout With Depression and Anxiety in Critical Care Clinicians in Brazil.
Adult
Anxiety
/ epidemiology
Brazil
/ epidemiology
Burnout, Professional
/ epidemiology
Critical Care
/ psychology
Depression
/ epidemiology
Female
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Male
Middle Aged
Physicians
/ psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2020
01 12 2020
Historique:
entrez:
23
12
2020
pubmed:
24
12
2020
medline:
29
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is unclear whether burnout, anxiety, and depression constitute the same or different constructs. Better understanding of these constructs is important for diagnosis and treatment for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. To determine the associations and distinctiveness of burnout, depression, and anxiety in a sample of ICU clinicians. This cross-sectional study used baseline data from the ICU Visits Study, a cluster-randomized crossover clinical trial conducted from April 2017 to July 2018 in 36 mixed public and private nonprofit ICUs in Brazil. ICU clinicians, including day-shift physicians, nurses, nurse technicians, and physiotherapists working in an ICU at least 20 hours per week, were enrolled. Data were analyzed from December 27, 2019, to October 10, 2020. The main outcome measures were burnout, depression, and anxiety measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI; range, 0-6, with high scores indicating more burnout) and the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS; range, 0-3, with higher scores indicating more depression or anxiety). Internal consistencies were satisfactory. The total sample included 715 ICU clinicians (median [interquartile range] age, 34.8 [30.2-39.3] years; 520 [72.7%] women), including 96 physicians (13.4%), 159 nurses (22.2%), 358 nurse technicians (50.1%), and 102 physiotherapists (14.3%). Clinicians reported low levels of emotional exhaustion (mean [SD] score, 1.84 [1.18]), depersonalization (mean [SD] score, 0.98 [1.03]), and personal accomplishment (mean [SD] score, 5.05 [0.87]) on the MBI, and similarly low levels of depression (mean [SD] score, 0.54 [0.40]) and anxiety (mean [SD] score, 0.70 [0.45]) on the HADS. Confirmatory factor analyses consistently showed improved fit separating latent burnout dimensions from depression and anxiety. An exploratory graph analysis combining gaussian graphical model with clustering algorithms for weighted networks suggested 3 clusters, with distinct burnout, anxiety, and depression clusters. This structure was confirmed using a bootstrap with 1000 random samples, in which the 3-cluster solution emerged in 625 samples (62.5%). Both latent variable loadings and network statistics suggested 3 key indicators (ie, feeling burned out from work, worrying thoughts, and reverse-scored reporting feeling cheerful) that can be used for short screening instruments. These findings suggest that burnout and clinical symptoms of depression and anxiety were empirically distinct in a large sample of ICU clinicians, highlighting the importance of screening for burnout and clinical symptoms to allow fast access to adequate support and treatment in health professionals at high risk of burnout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33355676
pii: 2774460
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30898
pmc: PMC7758805
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2030898Références
Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Oct;46(5):816-24
pubmed: 23128258
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634
pubmed: 29595293
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(12):1318-21
pubmed: 19802645
Psychosom Med. 2010 Jul;72(6):587-97
pubmed: 20467001
Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;47(4):550-557
pubmed: 30688716
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212
pubmed: 28342071
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77
pubmed: 11832252
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1111-1112
pubmed: 31314066
Intensive Care Med. 2018 May;44(5):681-683
pubmed: 29736787
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 13;10:284
pubmed: 30918490
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 18;10:1507
pubmed: 31379641
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Aug 12;:1-25
pubmed: 31401872
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 1;189:314-20
pubmed: 26458184
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Mar;36:28-41
pubmed: 25638755
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49
pubmed: 26174714
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 16;14:354
pubmed: 25511175
JAMA. 2019 Jul 16;322(3):216-228
pubmed: 31310297
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422
pubmed: 11148311
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e021193
pubmed: 29654049
Rev Saude Publica. 1995 Oct;29(5):355-63
pubmed: 8731275
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1414-21
pubmed: 27309157
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Dec;24(6):603-616
pubmed: 30945922
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jul;46(7):894-902
pubmed: 19362309
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150
pubmed: 30326495
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):137-50; discussion 150-93
pubmed: 20584369
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):292-320
pubmed: 32191105
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0174035
pubmed: 28594839
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 01;6:30750
pubmed: 27476470