Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Clinically Significant Improvements in Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy.
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
27
03
2020
revised:
05
11
2020
accepted:
06
11
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
12
6
2021
entrez:
28
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop machine learning algorithms to predict failure to achieve clinically significant satisfaction after hip arthroscopy. We queried a clinical repository for consecutive primary hip arthroscopy patients treated between January 2012 and January 2017. Five supervised machine learning algorithms were developed in a training set of patients and internally validated in an independent testing set of patients by discrimination, Brier score, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the visual analog scale (VAS) score for satisfaction was derived by an anchor-based method and used as the primary outcome. A total of 935 patients were included, of whom 148 (15.8%) did not achieve the MCID for the VAS satisfaction score at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. The best-performing algorithm was the neural network model (C statistic, 0.94; calibration intercept, -0.43; calibration slope, 0.94; and Brier score, 0.050). The 5 most important features to predict failure to achieve the MCID for the VAS satisfaction score were history of anxiety or depression, lateral center-edge angle, preoperative symptom duration exceeding 2 years, presence of 1 or more drug allergies, and Workers' Compensation. Supervised machine learning algorithms conferred excellent discrimination and performance for predicting clinically significant satisfaction after hip arthroscopy, although this analysis was performed in a single population of patients. External validation is required to confirm the performance of these algorithms. Level III, therapeutic case-control study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33359160
pii: S0749-8063(20)30976-2
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.027
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1143-1151Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.