Experience with an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery protocol at an academic community hospital.
Adult
Elective Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Female
Hospitals, Community
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Neurosurgical Procedures
Pain, Postoperative
/ etiology
Postoperative Complications
/ surgery
Spinal Fusion
/ methods
Spine
/ surgery
Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
fast-track surgery
quality improvement
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Dec 2020
25 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
13
03
2020
accepted:
27
07
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
16
2
2022
entrez:
28
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have rapidly gained popularity in multiple surgical specialties and are recognized for their potential to improve patient outcomes and decrease hospitalization costs. However, they have only recently been applied to spinal surgery. The goal in the present work was to describe the development, implementation, and impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery (ERASS) protocol for patients undergoing elective spine procedures at an academic community hospital. A multidisciplinary team, drawing on prior publications and spine surgery best practices, collaborated to develop an ERASS protocol. Patients undergoing elective cervical or lumbar procedures were prospectively enrolled at a single tertiary care center; interventions were standardized across the cohort for pre-, intra-, and postoperative care using standardized order sets in the electronic medical record. Protocol efficacy was evaluated by comparing enrolled patients to a historic cohort of age- and procedure-matched controls. The primary study outcomes were quantity of opiate use in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) on postoperative day (POD) 1 and length of stay. Secondary outcomes included frequency and duration of indwelling urinary catheter use, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission and reoperation rates, and complication rates. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine whether ERASS protocol use was independently predictive of opiate use on POD 1. In total, 97 patients were included in the study cohort and were compared with a historic cohort of 146 patients. The patients in the ERASS group had lower POD 1 opiate use than the control group (26 ± 33 vs 42 ± 40 MMEs, p < 0.001), driven largely by differences in opiate-naive patients (16 ± 21 vs 38 ± 36 MMEs, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients in the ERASS group had shorter hospitalizations than patients in the control group (51 ± 30 vs 62 ± 49 hours, p = 0.047). On multivariable regression, implementation of the ERASS protocol was independently predictive of lower POD 1 opiate consumption (β = -7.32, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes. The authors found that the development and implementation of a comprehensive ERASS protocol led to a modest reduction in postoperative opiate consumption and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing elective cervical or lumbar procedures. As suggested by these results and those of other groups, the implementation of ERASS protocols may reduce care costs and improve patient outcomes after spine surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33361481
doi: 10.3171/2020.7.SPINE20358
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM