Prenatal Diagnosis for Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders-An Overview of the Indian Scenario.
chorionic villus sampling
cordocentesis
flow cytometry
maternal contamination
prenatal diagnosis
variants of unknown significance
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
09
2020
accepted:
04
11
2020
entrez:
28
12
2020
pubmed:
29
12
2020
medline:
24
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prenatal Diagnosis (PND) forms an important part of primary preventive management for families having a child affected with primary immunodeficiency. Although individually sparse, collectively this group of genetic disorders represents a significant burden of disease. This paper discusses the prenatal services available for affected families at various centers across the country and the challenges and ethical considerations associated with genetic counseling. Mutation detection in the index case and analysis of chorionic villous sampling or amniocentesis remain the preferred procedures for PND and phenotypic analysis of cordocentesis sample is reserved for families with well-characterized index case seeking PND in the latter part of the second trimester of pregnancy. A total of 112 families were provided PND services in the last decade and the presence of an affected fetus was confirmed in 32 families. Post-test genetic counseling enabled the affected families to make an informed decision about the current pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33365035
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.612316
pmc: PMC7750517
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
612316Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Yadav, Gupta, Dalvi, Bargir, Hule, Shabrish, Aluri, Kulkarni, Kambli, Uppuluri, Seshadri, Jagadeesh, Suresh, Raja, Taur, Malaischamy, Ghosh, Mahalingam, Kadam, Lashkari, Tamhankar, Tamhankar, Mithbawkar, Bhattad, Jhawar, Makam, Bansal, Prasad, Govindaraj, Guhan, Bharadwaj Tallapaka, Desai, Raj and Madkaikar.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SMal, PG, SMah, and PKad were employed by the company MedGenome Labs Private Limited. SJ, BS, and JR were employed by the company Mediscan Systems. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Aug;18(8):689-699
pubmed: 29962246
J Clin Immunol. 2019 Feb;39(2):182-187
pubmed: 30778805
Genet Med. 2018 Aug;20(8):791-799
pubmed: 30032162
West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):391-5
pubmed: 8236982
J Clin Immunol. 2014 Apr;34(3):316-22
pubmed: 24535004
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Nov;38(12):897-903
pubmed: 30171820
Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;51(1):3-5
pubmed: 19742202
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Jan;51(1):197-204
pubmed: 23072857
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Dec;79(12):1605-9
pubmed: 22477041
Clin Mol Allergy. 2008 Jun 02;6:5
pubmed: 18518992
Per Med. 2015;12(3):283-295
pubmed: 26478737
J Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan;40(1):24-64
pubmed: 31953710
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):442-451
pubmed: 31124209
Indian J Med Res. 2011 Oct;134:552-60
pubmed: 22089620
J Clin Immunol. 2018 Aug;38(6):646-655
pubmed: 30046960
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Dec 22;14(4):18078-89
pubmed: 26782455
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;48(2):256-68
pubmed: 27485589
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):195-205
pubmed: 27631408