Analysis of acute-phase toxicities of intensity-modulated proton therapy using a model-based approach in pharyngeal cancer patients.
IMPT
pharyngeal cancer
robust optimization
Journal
Journal of radiation research
ISSN: 1349-9157
Titre abrégé: J Radiat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Mar 2021
10 Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
28
07
2020
revised:
09
11
2020
pubmed:
30
12
2020
medline:
4
11
2021
entrez:
29
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using a model-based approach were retrospectively reviewed, and acute toxicities were analyzed. From June 2016 to March 2019, 15 pharyngeal (7 naso-, 5 oro- and 3 hypo-pharyngeal) cancer patients received IMPT with robust optimization. Simulation plans for IMPT and intensity-modulated X-ray therapy (IMXT) were generated before treatment. We also reviewed 127 pharyngeal cancer patients with IMXT in the same treatment period. In the simulation planning comparison, all of the normal-tissue complication probability values for dysphagia, dysgeusia, tube-feeding dependence and xerostomia were lower for IMPT than for IMXT in the 15 patients. After completing IMPT, 13 patients completed the evaluation, and 12 of these patients had a complete response. The proportions of patients who experienced grade 2 or worse acute toxicities in the IMPT and IMXT cohorts were 21.4 and 56.5% for dysphagia (P < 0.05), 46.7 and 76.3% for dysgeusia (P < 0.05), 73.3 and 62.8% for xerostomia (P = 0.43), 73.3 and 90.6% for mucositis (P = 0.08) and 66.7 and 76.4% for dermatitis (P = 0.42), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that IMPT was independently associated with a lower rate of grade 2 or worse dysphagia and dysgeusia. After propensity score matching, 12 pairs of IMPT and IMXT patients were selected. Dysphagia was also statistically lower in IMPT than in IMXT (P < 0.05). IMPT using a model-based approach may have clinical benefits for acute dysphagia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33372202
pii: 6054643
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa130
pmc: PMC7948838
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
329-337Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2001 Dec;61(3):287-97
pubmed: 11730999
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jun;147:64-74
pubmed: 32234612
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):1079-91
pubmed: 22320818
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152477
pubmed: 27030987
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov 28;12(1):190
pubmed: 29183377
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Jan;106(1):85-9
pubmed: 23337058
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):48-55
pubmed: 27342249
J Radiat Res. 2018 Mar 1;59(suppl_1):i63-i71
pubmed: 29309691
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0200137
pubmed: 29979726
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Nov 10;10:226
pubmed: 26555303
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jul 15;95(4):1107-14
pubmed: 27354125
Med Phys. 2013 May;40(5):051711
pubmed: 23635259
Cancer Treat Rev. 2011 Nov;37(7):511-9
pubmed: 21324605
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):111-7
pubmed: 19157609
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Oct;113(1):95-101
pubmed: 25443500
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Oct;105(1):101-6
pubmed: 22516776
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Oct 1;96(2):354-361
pubmed: 27473816
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Oct;105(1):107-14
pubmed: 21907437
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Dec;101(3):376-82
pubmed: 21663988
Oncologist. 2011;16(3):366-77
pubmed: 21349950