Evaluation of the precision of operative augmented reality compared to standard neuronavigation using a 3D-printed skull.


Journal

Neurosurgical focus
ISSN: 1092-0684
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Focus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896471

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2021
Historique:
received: 31 08 2020
accepted: 22 10 2020
entrez: 1 1 2021
pubmed: 2 1 2021
medline: 30 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Augmented reality (AR) in cranial surgery allows direct projection of preregistered overlaid images in real time on the microscope surgical field. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the precision of AR-assisted navigation and standard pointer-based neuronavigation (NV) by using a 3D-printed skull in surgical conditions. A commercial standardized 3D-printed skull was scanned, fused, and referenced with an MR image and a CT scan of a patient with a 2 × 2-mm right frontal sinus defect. The defect was identified, registered, and integrated into NV. The target was physically marked on the 3D-printed skull replicating the right frontal sinus defect. Twenty-six subjects participated, 25 of whom had no prior NV or AR experience and 1 with little AR experience. The subjects were briefly trained in how to use NV, AR, and AR recalibration tools. Participants were asked to do the following: 1) "target the center of the defect in the 3D-printed skull with a navigation pointer, assisted only by NV orientation," and 2) "use the surgical microscope and AR to focus on the center of the projected object" under conventional surgical conditions. For the AR task, the number of recalibrations was recorded. Confidence regarding NV and AR precision were assessed prior to and after the experiment by using a 9-level Likert scale. The median distance to target was statistically lower for AR than for NV (1 mm [Q1: 1 mm, Q3: 2 mm] vs 3 mm [Q1: 2 mm, Q3: 4 mm] [p < 0.001]). In the AR task, the median number of recalibrations was 4 (Q1: 4, Q3: 4.75). The number of recalibrations was significantly correlated with the precision (Spearman rho: -0.71, p < 0.05). The trust assessment after performing the experiment scored a median of 8 for AR and 5.5 for NV (p < 0.01). This study shows for the first time the superiority of AR over NV in terms of precision. AR is easy to use. The number of recalibrations performed using reference structures increases the precision of the navigation. The confidence regarding precision increases with experience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33386018
doi: 10.3171/2020.10.FOCUS20789
pii: 2020.10.FOCUS20789
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

E17

Auteurs

Julien Haemmerli (J)

1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals; and.

Alioucha Davidovic (A)

2Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Torstein R Meling (TR)

1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals; and.

Lara Chavaz (L)

2Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Karl Schaller (K)

1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals; and.

Philippe Bijlenga (P)

1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals; and.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH