Icb-1 expression inhibits growth and fulvestrant response of breast cancer cells and affects survival of breast cancer patients.
Adult
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
/ pharmacology
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Cell Line, Tumor
Computational Biology
Estradiol
/ pharmacology
Estrogen Antagonists
/ pharmacology
Female
Fulvestrant
/ pharmacology
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Antiestrogen
ICI 182,780
THEMIS2
Tumor suppressor
siRNA
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
15
06
2020
accepted:
17
11
2020
pubmed:
4
1
2021
medline:
11
11
2021
entrez:
3
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Human gene icb-1 recently has been reported to be part of a gene expression score predicting response to antiestrogen fulvestrant in breast cancer patients. In the present study, we examined to what extent icb-1 expression would affect the response of breast cancer cells to this antiestrogen in vitro and investigated underlying molecular mechanisms. Using open access mRNA data, we elucidated the significance of icb-1 expression for survival of breast cancer patients. Icb-1 gene expression was knocked down by RNAi. Breast cancer cell growth after treatment with fulvestrant was assessed using the Cell Titer Blue assay. Gene expression was analyzed by Western blot analysis or RT-qPCR. Survival analyses were performed using bioinformatical online tools and data. Knockdown of icb-1 in T-47D breast cancer cells significantly increased growth of this cell line and also elevated the growth-stimulatory effect of E2 (p < 0.001). After treatment with different concentrations of fulvestrant, icb-1 knockdown cells exhibited a significantly enhanced response to this drug (p < 0.01). On the molecular level, icb-1 knockdown led to elevated expression of ESR1 and its target gene TFF1 (pS2) and enhanced E2-triggered up-regulation of proliferation genes. Finally, bioinformatical meta-analysis of gene expression data of 3951 breast cancer patients revealed that high icb-1 expression increases their relapse-free survival (HR = 0.87, p < 0.05). The presented data further support a tumor-suppressive role of icb-1 in breast cancer and suggest an inhibitory effect of this gene on fulvestrant action, which both are suggested to be mediated by suppression of cellular E2 response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33389102
doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05902-x
pii: 10.1007/s00404-020-05902-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
0
Estrogen Antagonists
0
Fulvestrant
22X328QOC4
Estradiol
4TI98Z838E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
203-213Références
Treeck O, Strunck E, Vollmer G (1998) A novel basement membrane-induced gene identified in the human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line HEC1B. FEBS Lett 425(3):426–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00278-6
doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00278-6
pubmed: 9563507
Treeck O (2011) Silencing of the icb-1 gene inhibits the induction of differentiation-associated genes by vitamin D3 and all-trans retinoic acid in gynecological cancer cells. Int J Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2011.663
doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2011.663
pubmed: 21455565
Treeck O, Odani T, Itoh N et al (2002) Detection of increased icb-1 transcript levels in maturing HL-60 cells: a novel marker for granulocytic and monocytic in vitro differentiation. Leuk Res 26(8):765–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2126(02)00005-x
doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(02)00005-x
pubmed: 12191572
Peirce MJ, Brook M, Morrice N et al (2010) Themis2/ICB1 is a signalling scaffold that selectively regulates macrophage toll-like receptor signalling and cytokine production. PLoS ONE 5(7):e11465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011465
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011465
pubmed: 20644716
pmcid: 2903609
Muraoka S, Kume H, Adachi J et al (2013) In-depth membrane proteomic study of breast cancer tissues for the generation of a chromosome-based protein list. J Proteome Res 12(1):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr300824m
doi: 10.1021/pr300824m
pubmed: 23153008
Treeck O, Kindzorra I, Pauser K et al (2005) Expression of icb-1 gene is interferon-gamma inducible in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines and affects the IFN gamma-response of SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cells. Cytokine 32(3–4):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2005.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2005.08.008
pubmed: 16219472
Bollmann J, Ortmann O, Treeck O (2008) Expression of differentiation-associated gene icb-1 is estrogen-responsive in ovarian and breast cancer cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 109(1–2):16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.12.007
doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.12.007
pubmed: 18206364
Konwisorz A, Springwald A, Haselberger M et al (2010) Knockdown of ICB-1 gene enhanced estrogen responsiveness of ovarian and breast cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer 17(1):147–157. https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-09-0095
doi: 10.1677/ERC-09-0095
pubmed: 19942713
Springwald A, Lattrich C, Seitz S et al (2009) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in human gene icb-1 and breast cancer susceptibility. Cancer Invest 27(6):669–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/07357900802620877
doi: 10.1080/07357900802620877
pubmed: 19308812
Treeck O, Schüler S, Häring J et al (2013) icb-1 Gene counteracts growth of ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett 335(2):441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.049
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.049
pubmed: 23474491
Treeck O, Belgutay D, Häring J et al (2012) Network analysis of icb-1 gene function in human breast cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 113(9):2979–2988. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.24175
doi: 10.1002/jcb.24175
pubmed: 22565810
Knudsen S, Jensen T, Hansen A et al (2014) Development and validation of a gene expression score that predicts response to fulvestrant in breast cancer patients. PLoS ONE 9(2):e87415. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087415
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087415
pubmed: 24505287
pmcid: 3914825
Girish V, Vijayalakshmi A (2004) Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ImageJ. Indian J Cancer 41(1):47
pubmed: 15105580
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25(4):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3(6):1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.73
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73
pubmed: 18546601
Tang Z, Li C, Kang B et al (2017) GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 45(W1):W98–W102. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx247
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx247
pubmed: 28407145
pmcid: 5570223
Györffy B, Lanczky A, Eklund AC et al (2010) An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123(3):725–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9
doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9
Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 406(6797):747–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021093
doi: 10.1038/35021093
Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(19):10869–10874. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191367098
doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098
pubmed: 11553815
Ikeda K, Horie-Inoue K, Inoue S (2015) Identification of estrogen-responsive genes based on the DNA binding properties of estrogen receptors using high-throughput sequencing technology. Acta Pharmacol Sin 36(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2014.123
doi: 10.1038/aps.2014.123
pubmed: 25500870
Blanchard JM (2000) Cyclin A2 transcriptional regulation: modulation of cell cycle control at the G1/S transition by peripheral cues. Biochem Pharmacol 60(8):1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952(00)00384-1
doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(00)00384-1
pubmed: 11007956
Sales Gil R, Vagnarelli P (2018) Ki-67: more hidden behind a “classic proliferation marker.” Trends Biochem Sci 43(10):747–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.08.004
pubmed: 30131191