Employer survey to estimate the productivity friction period.

Economic evaluation Friction cost approach Friction period Productivity loss

Journal

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care
ISSN: 1618-7601
Titre abrégé: Eur J Health Econ
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101134867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 18 08 2020
accepted: 17 11 2020
pubmed: 4 1 2021
medline: 31 8 2021
entrez: 3 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The friction cost approach (FCA) is one way to estimate lost productivity, which considers the time taken to replace an employee, known as the friction period. The friction period may be influenced by local labour market conditions, limiting the relevance of international FCA estimates. The objective was to estimate the time and costs of replacing an employee in Australia. Staff responsible for recruitment in businesses across Australia were surveyed about the last management and non-management employee hired, workforce composition, friction period time and costs, and team dynamic effects. Primary analyses were conducted on respondents that recruited in the past 12 months. The friction period was decomposed into three periods: recruitment decision, recruitment period, and training period. Descriptive statistics of the friction period time and costs, and team dynamic effects were calculated. The sample consisted of Australian businesses (N = 274), primarily micro-organisations (2-4 employees, 44%) in urban locations (75%). The time (12.3 weeks; SD 15.1) and costs ($6230; SD $17,502) to replace a manager were higher than those to replace non-managers (10.0 weeks, SD 13.01; $2666, sd $7849). The training period represented the longest time component in replacing an employee (38-40% of the total friction period). There was an increasing impact on other employees' productivity, particularly for absent managers as time off work increased. The friction period in Australia was similar to international estimates. Interestingly, the friction period mainly consisted of time outside the recruitment period; the decision to recruit and the training period.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33389332
doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01250-4
pii: 10.1007/s10198-020-01250-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

255-266

Références

Krol, M., Brouwer, W.: How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 32(4), 335–344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0132-3
doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0132-3 pubmed: 24504850
Koopmanschap, M.A., Rutten, F.F.: A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics 10(5), 460–466 (1996)
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00003
Liljas, B.: How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 13(1 Pt 1), 1–7 (1998)
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00001
Sanders, G.D., Neumann, P.J., Basu, A., Brock, D.W., Feeny, D., Krahn, M., Kuntz, K.M., Meltzer, D.O., Owens, D.K., Prosser, L.A., Salomon, J.A., Sculpher, M.J., Trikalinos, T.A., Russell, L.B., Siegel, J.E., Ganiats, T.G.: Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 316(10), 1093–1103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12195
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195 pubmed: 27623463
Siegel, J.E., Torrance, G.W., Russell, L.B., Luce, B.R., Weinstein, M.C., Gold, M.R.: Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. Recommendations from the panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. Panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. PharmacoEconomics 11(2), 159–168 (1997)
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711020-00005
Zhang, W., Bansback, N., Anis, A.H.: Measuring and valuing productivity loss due to poor health: a critical review. Soc Sci Med 72(2), 185–192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.026
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.026 pubmed: 21146909
Kigozi, J., Jowett, S., Lewis, M., Barton, P., Coast, J.: Valuing productivity costs using the friction-cost approach: estimating friction-period estimates by occupational classifications for the UK. Health Econ. 26(12), 1862–1868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3513
doi: 10.1002/hec.3513 pubmed: 28449329
Kigozi, J., Jowett, S., Lewis, M., Barton, P., Coast, J.: Estimating productivity costs using the friction cost approach in practice: a systematic review. Eur. J. Health Econ. 17(1), 31–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0652-y
doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0652-y pubmed: 25387561
Erdogan-Ciftci, E., Koopmanschap, M.A.: PC2 estimation of productivity costs using the friction cost method: new evidence using national data. Value Health 14(7), A235–A236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.030
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.030
Hanly, P., Pearce, A., Sharp, L.: Cancer and productivity loss in the Irish economy: an employer’s perspective. Irish J. Manag. 36, 5–20 (2017)
doi: 10.1515/ijm-2017-0003
van Ours, J., Ridder, G.: Cyclical variation in vacancy durations and vancancy flows. Eur. Econ. Rev. 35, 1143–1155 (1991a)
doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(91)90010-G
Dube, A., Freeman, E., Reich, M.: Employee replacement costs. IRLE Working Paper No. 201–10, (2010)
Soegaard, R., Bünger, C.E., Christiansen, T., Høy, K., Eiskjaer, S.P., Christensen, F.B.: Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain. Spine 32(22), 2405–2414 (2007)
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573b2d
Nicholson, S., Pauly, M.V., Polsky, D., Sharda, C., Szrek, H., Berger, M.L.: Measuring the effects of work loss on productivity with team production. Health Econ. 15(2), 111–123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1052
doi: 10.1002/hec.1052 pubmed: 16200550
Pauly, M.V., Nicholson, S., Polsky, D., Berger, M.L., Sharda, C.: Valuing reductions in on-the-job illness: ‘presenteeism’ from managerial and economic perspectives. Health Econ. 17(4), 469–485 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1266
doi: 10.1002/hec.1266 pubmed: 17628862
van Ours, J., Ridder, G.: Cyclical variation in vacancy durations and vacancy flows: an empirical analysis. Eur. Econ. Rev. 35(5), 1143–1155 (1991b)
doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(91)90010-G
Australian Bureau of Statistics: 6202.0—Labour Force, Australia, September 2018. (2018)
Reserve Bank of Australia: Box B: underemployment and labour market spare capacity. (2017)
Tan, S.S., Bouwmans, C.A., Rutten, F.F., Hakkaart-van Roijen, L.: Update of the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 28(2), 152–158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462312000062
doi: 10.1017/s0266462312000062 pubmed: 22559757
Australian Bureau of Statistics: 1220.0—ANZSCO—Australian and New Zealand standard classification of occupations, 2013, Version 1.3. In. (2013)
Australian Bureau of Statistics: 8155.0—Australian Industry, 2018–19. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/8155.0Main%20Features42018-19?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=8155.0&issue=2018-19&num=&view (2020)
Australian Government: Australian small business, key statistics and analysis. In: Department of Industry, I., Science, Research and Tertiary Education (ed.). (2012)
Pfitzner, D., McLaren, J.: Microbusinesses in Australia: a robust definition. Australas. Account. Bus. Financ. J. 12, 4–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v12i3.2
doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v12i3.2
Reserve Bank of Australia: small business: an economic overview. (2012)
Bajgar, M.J., Berlingieri, G., Calligaris, S., Criscuolo, C., Timmis, J.: Industry concentration in Europe and North America. (2019)
Furman, J.: Market concentration. OECD Competition Committee on 6–8 June 2018, DAF/COMP/WD(2018)67 (2018)
Krol, M., Brouwer, W.B., Severens, J.L., Kaper, J., Evers, S.M.: Productivity cost calculations in health economic evaluations: correcting for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects. Soc Sci Med 75(11), 1981–1988 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.012
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.012 pubmed: 22925428
Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., Startz, R.: Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, (2011)
Quiggin, J.: The Australian productivity miracle: a sceptical view. Agenda J. Policy Anal Reform 8(4), 333–348 (2001)

Auteurs

Kathleen Manipis (K)

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW, 2007, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, Australia. kathleen.manipis@chere.uts.edu.au.

Stephen Goodall (S)

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW, 2007, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Paul Hanly (P)

School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Rosalie Viney (R)

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway NSW, 2007, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Alison Pearce (A)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH