Upfront surgery or definitive radiotherapy for p16+ oropharyngeal cancer. A GETTEC multicentric study.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Cetuximab
/ therapeutic use
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Cisplatin
/ therapeutic use
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
/ metabolism
Female
Humans
Induction Chemotherapy
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ surgery
Neoplasm Staging
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
/ metabolism
Papillomavirus Infections
/ complications
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Cancer
Human papilloma virus
Oropharynx
Radiotherapy
Surgery
Survival
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
28
09
2020
revised:
25
11
2020
accepted:
15
12
2020
pubmed:
5
1
2021
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
4
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the initial therapeutic strategy on oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. All p16-positive OPSCCs treated from 2009 to 2014 in 7 centers were retrospectively included and classified according to the therapeutic strategy: surgical strategy (surgery ± adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) vs. non-surgical strategy (definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy). Univariate, multivariate propensity score matching analyses were performed to compare overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). 382 patients were included (surgical group: 144; non-surgical group: 238). Five-year OS, DSS and RFS were 89.2, 96.8 and 83.9% in the surgical group and 84.2, 87.1 and 70.4% in the non-surgical group, respectively. These differences were statistically significant for DSS and RFS after multivariate analysis, but only for RFS after propensity score matching analysis. In p16+ OPSCC patients, upfront surgery results in higher RFS than definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy but does not impact OS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the initial therapeutic strategy on oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC.
METHODS
All p16-positive OPSCCs treated from 2009 to 2014 in 7 centers were retrospectively included and classified according to the therapeutic strategy: surgical strategy (surgery ± adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy) vs. non-surgical strategy (definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy). Univariate, multivariate propensity score matching analyses were performed to compare overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
RESULTS
382 patients were included (surgical group: 144; non-surgical group: 238). Five-year OS, DSS and RFS were 89.2, 96.8 and 83.9% in the surgical group and 84.2, 87.1 and 70.4% in the non-surgical group, respectively. These differences were statistically significant for DSS and RFS after multivariate analysis, but only for RFS after propensity score matching analysis.
CONCLUSION
In p16+ OPSCC patients, upfront surgery results in higher RFS than definitive radiotherapy ± chemotherapy but does not impact OS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33390333
pii: S0748-7983(20)31230-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.011
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
CDKN2A protein, human
0
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16
0
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1389-1397Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.