Establishment and verification of an osteoporosis risk model in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a valuable new model.

7-joint ultrasound score Model verification Osteoporosis Prediction model Rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

Archives of osteoporosis
ISSN: 1862-3514
Titre abrégé: Arch Osteoporos
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101318988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 01 2021
Historique:
received: 02 10 2020
accepted: 03 12 2020
entrez: 4 1 2021
pubmed: 5 1 2021
medline: 2 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To establish a model for osteoporosis risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and validate the model. A newly generated predictive model has been suggested to have good differentiation, calibration, and clinical validity and may be a useful clinical model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To establish a prediction model for osteoporosis risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and validate the model internally and externally. A total of 270 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent bone mineral density measurement at our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020 were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to their entry time: a training set containing the first 2/3 of the patients (n = 180) and a validation set containing the remaining 1/3 of the patients (n = 90). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to establish the regression models, and the concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the prediction model. Five variables, including age (X1), course of disease (X2), the disease activity score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) (X4), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (CCP) (X7), and 7-joint ultrasonic bone erosion (X14), were selected to enter the model. The prediction model is Logit Y = - 12.647 + 0.133X1 + 0.011X2 + 0.754X4 + 0.001X7 + 0.605X14. The model had good differentiation; the C-index in the internal verification was 0.947 (95% CI is 0.932-0.977) and the C-index in the external verification was 0.946 (95% CI is 0.940-0.994). The calibration plot of the model showed excellent consistency between the prediction probability and actual probability. When > 0.483 was taken as the cutoff value for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and Jordan index of the model were 90.24%, 87.76%, 7.37, 0.11, and 78.00%, respectively. A newly generated predictive model has been suggested to have good differentiation, calibration, and clinical validity and may be a useful clinical model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33394305
doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00867-5
pii: 10.1007/s11657-020-00867-5
pmc: PMC7782444
doi:

Substances chimiques

Autoantibodies 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3

Références

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 07;:
pubmed: 30847477
J Clin Ultrasound. 2020 Jan;48(1):14-18
pubmed: 31654421
Rheumatol Int. 2009 Jun;29(8):897-905
pubmed: 19104820
J Clin Densitom. 2019 Jul - Sep;22(3):321-328
pubmed: 30205984
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 May;74(5):897-903
pubmed: 24445255
Eur J Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;6(1):29-33
pubmed: 30973322
J Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;42(11):2055-8
pubmed: 26428208
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14083
pubmed: 30732128
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81
pubmed: 20872595
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):657-63
pubmed: 20191472
J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Apr;65(4):26-30
pubmed: 28527160
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jul 15;21(1):174
pubmed: 31307521
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2020;16(1):74-78
pubmed: 31333130
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019 May 23;21(7):34
pubmed: 31123839
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Aug;64(8):1238-43
pubmed: 22438306
Adv Ther. 2018 Feb;35(2):232-242
pubmed: 29368271
Rheumatol Int. 2017 May;37(5):799-806
pubmed: 28243799
J Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;25(6):264-271
pubmed: 29965853
Bone. 2018 Sep;114:172-180
pubmed: 29913256
Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Jul;86(4):467-474
pubmed: 30711693
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Oct 18;47(5):774-80
pubmed: 26474614
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Oct 6;18(1):226
pubmed: 27716332
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2801-2812
pubmed: 28779302
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jul;70(7):961-969
pubmed: 29106028
Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Jul;101(1):17-23
pubmed: 28246933
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;39(2):357-364
pubmed: 31691041
Front Immunol. 2019 Apr 03;10:679
pubmed: 31001277
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):ITC1-ITC16
pubmed: 30596879

Auteurs

Xiaobin Yan (X)

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.

Zhenhong Xu (Z)

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.

Shilin Li (S)

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.

Lisheng Yan (L)

Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.

Guorong Lyu (G)

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China. lgr_feus@sina.com.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, 362000, China. lgr_feus@sina.com.

Zecheng Wang (Z)

Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH