Hearing loss among military personnel in relation to occupational and leisure noise exposure and usage of personal protective equipment.
Adult
Audiometry
Cross-Sectional Studies
Ear Protective Devices
/ statistics & numerical data
Environmental Exposure
/ adverse effects
Female
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced
/ epidemiology
Humans
Leisure Activities
Male
Middle Aged
Military Personnel
/ statistics & numerical data
Music
Noise, Occupational
/ adverse effects
Occupational Diseases
/ epidemiology
Occupational Exposure
/ adverse effects
Odds Ratio
Personal Protective Equipment
/ statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
United States
/ epidemiology
Active service
audiometry
hearing protection
noise exposure
Journal
Noise & health
ISSN: 1998-4030
Titre abrégé: Noise Health
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9815620
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
6
1
2021
pubmed:
7
1
2021
medline:
17
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hearing loss (HL) is a major health concern among military personnel due to noise from shooting, blasts, military vehicles, and noisy training environments. Nevertheless, one's exposure can be partially reduced by using personal protective equipment (PPE). The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of HL among military personnel, to analyse associations between HL and self-reported occupational and leisure noise exposure, and use of PPEs. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 military personnel during their routine medical examinations. First, all participants filled in a questionnaire about their exposure to noise and later the respondents went through an audiometric test. The diagnostic criteria for slight, moderate, and severe HL was HL of 25-40, 41-60, and >60 dB at 4 and 6 kHz, respectively. The associations between noise exposure and HL were studied with multinomial logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of slight to severe HL in high frequencies (4 and 6 kHz) among study participants was 62.7%. Nevertheless, the majority of it was slight, as the prevalence of severe HL was 9.3%. The prevalence of any kind of HL was highest in the Navy and the prevalence of severe HL was highest in the Central Command Units. The relative risk ratios (RRRs) for HL were higher among those who had been working for a long time in a noisy environment, working with noise-producing equipment, driving in a PASI or a Bandvagn or had been shooting with blanks at least once per week. It also appeared that military personnel who had HL, reported tinnitus more often. Respondents' previous health problems, music-listening habits, and amount of exposure to loud noise in non-military environments were not independently associated with HL, but in several cases it increased the RRRs together with military exposure. We also found significantly more frequent HL among those never using PPEs. HL loss was more prevalent among personnel who are more often exposed to military noise, especially among those who never use PPEs. The effect was enhanced by leisure time noise, but it was not independently associated to HL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33402609
pii: NoiseHealth_2020_22_107_90_305733
doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_12_19
pmc: PMC8000139
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
90-98Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:21-30
pubmed: 27913314
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1 Suppl):S71-7
pubmed: 20117602
Hear Res. 2009 May;251(1-2):10-6
pubmed: 19249340
Noise Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;13(50):64-70
pubmed: 21173489
Mil Med. 2012 Nov;177(11):1431-7
pubmed: 23198527
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Oct;22(5):384-7
pubmed: 25188428
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014 Nov;26(6):651-9
pubmed: 24285776
Risk Anal. 2005 Apr;25(2):389-96
pubmed: 15876212
Int J Audiol. 2015;54(10):665-73
pubmed: 25906840
Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):79-84
pubmed: 15035560
Int J Audiol. 2013 Feb;52 Suppl 1:S9-19
pubmed: 23373743
Noise Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(74):34-42
pubmed: 25599756
Hear Res. 2013 Jan;295:3-8
pubmed: 22575206
Mil Med. 2007 Apr;172(4):426-30
pubmed: 17484318
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 02;6(9):e011923
pubmed: 27591022
Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:13-20
pubmed: 27768901
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008 Jun;79(6):591-8
pubmed: 18581943
Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:42-54
pubmed: 27876480
Mil Med. 2012 May;177(5):589-93
pubmed: 22645887
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jan;77(1):57-61
pubmed: 16422455
Noise Health. 2017 Nov-Dec;19(91):263-269
pubmed: 29319010
Mil Med Res. 2015 Feb 25;2:6
pubmed: 26045968
Noise Health. 2011 Nov-Dec;13(55):402-6
pubmed: 22122956
Mil Med. 2016 Jul;181(7):687-92
pubmed: 27391623
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May 23;46(1):41
pubmed: 28535812
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Jul;88(5):641-9
pubmed: 25287192
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Dec;76(12):1128-35
pubmed: 16370263
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;77(6):747-53
pubmed: 22183281
Noise Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;13(53):320-7
pubmed: 21768736
Int J Audiol. 2009;48(6):394-400
pubmed: 19925346
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;20(3):281-9
pubmed: 27413413
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994 Apr;20(2):93-100
pubmed: 8079140
Int J Audiol. 2003 Jan;42(1):29-33
pubmed: 12564513
Int J Audiol. 2004 Mar;43(3):177-81
pubmed: 15198383
Hear Res. 2017 Jun;349:4-12
pubmed: 28153668