Perceived Benefits and Harms of Involuntary Civil Commitment for Opioid Use Disorder.
Journal
The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
ISSN: 1748-720X
Titre abrégé: J Law Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9315583
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
entrez:
6
1
2021
pubmed:
7
1
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) prevents imminent overdose, but also restricts autonomy and raises other ethical concerns. Using the Kass Public Health Ethics Framework, we identified ICC benefits and harms. Benefits include: protection of vulnerable, underserved patients; reduced legal consequences; resources for families; and "on-demand" treatment access. Harms include: stigmatizing and punitive experiences; heightened family conflict and social isolation; eroded patient self-determination; limited or no provision of OUD medications; and long-term overdose risk. To use ICC ethically, it should be recognized as comprising vulnerable patients worthy of added protections; be a last resort option; utilize consensual, humanizing processes; provide medications and other evidence-based-treatment; integrate with existing healthcare systems; and demonstrate effective outcomes before diffusion. ICC to OUD treatment carries significant potential harms that, if unaddressed, may outweigh its benefits. Findings can inform innovations for ensuring that ICC is used in an ethically responsible way.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33404337
doi: 10.1177/1073110520979382
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Pagination
718-734Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : UG3 DA044830
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn