Nitrogen Assimilation Varies Among Clades of Nectar- and Insect-Associated Acinetobacters.

Acinetobacter Floral nectar Insect Nitrogen assimilation Phylogenetic signal Trait differentiation

Journal

Microbial ecology
ISSN: 1432-184X
Titre abrégé: Microb Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7500663

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 15 06 2020
accepted: 20 12 2020
pubmed: 7 1 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 6 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Floral nectar is commonly colonized by yeasts and bacteria, whose growth largely depends on their capacity to assimilate nutrient resources, withstand high osmotic pressures, and cope with unbalanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratios. Although the basis of the ecological success of these microbes in the harsh environment of nectar is still poorly understood, it is reasonable to assume that they are efficient nitrogen scavengers that can consume a wide range of nitrogen sources in nectar. Furthermore, it can be hypothesized that phylogenetically closely related strains have more similar phenotypic characteristics than distant relatives. We tested these hypotheses by investigating the growth performance on different nitrogen-rich substrates of a collection of 82 acinetobacters isolated from nectar and honeybees, representing members of five species (Acinetobacter nectaris, A. boissieri, A. apis, and the recently described taxa A. bareti and A. pollinis). We also analyzed possible links between growth performance and phylogenetic affiliation of the isolates, while taking into account their geographical origin. Results demonstrated that the studied isolates could utilize a wide variety of nitrogen sources, including common metabolic by-products of yeasts (e.g., ammonium and urea), and that phylogenetic relatedness was associated with the variation in nitrogen assimilation among the studied acinetobacters. Finally, nutrient source and the origin (sample type and country) of isolates also predicted the ability of the acinetobacters to assimilate nitrogen-rich compounds. Overall, these results demonstrate inter-clade variation in the potential of the acinetobacters as nitrogen scavengers and suggest that nutritional dependences might influence interactions between bacteria and yeasts in floral nectar.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33404822
doi: 10.1007/s00248-020-01671-x
pii: 10.1007/s00248-020-01671-x
doi:

Substances chimiques

Plant Nectar 0
Nitrogen N762921K75

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

990-1003

Subventions

Organisme : H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
ID : 742964
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : DEB 1737758
Organisme : Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
ID : RYC2018-023847-I

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Simpson BB, Neff JL (1981) Floral rewards: alternatives to pollen and nectar. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 68(2):301–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/2398800
doi: 10.2307/2398800
Nepi M, Grasso DA, Mancuso S (2018) Nectar in plant-insect mutualistic relationships: from food reward to partner manipulation. Front Plant Sci 9:1063. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01063
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01063 pubmed: 30073014 pmcid: 6060274
Nepi M (2017) New perspectives in nectar evolution and ecology: simple alimentary reward or a complex multiorganism interaction? Acta Agrobot 70(1):1704. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1704
doi: 10.5586/aa.1704
Parachnowitsch AL, Manson JS, Sletvold N (2019) Evolutionary ecology of nectar. Ann Bot 123(2):247–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy132
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy132 pubmed: 30032269
Belisle M, Peay KG, Fukami T (2012) Flowers as islands: spatial distribution of nectar-inhabiting microfungi among plants of Mimulus aurantiacus, a hummingbird-pollinated shrub. Microb Ecol 63(4):711–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9975-8
doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9975-8 pubmed: 22080257
Pozo MI, Lievens B, Jacquemyn H (2015) Impact of microorganisms on nectar chemistry, pollinator attraction and plant fitness. In: Peck RL (ed) Nectar: production, chemical composition and benefits to animals and plants. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 1–40
Chappell CR, Fukami T (2018) Nectar yeasts: a natural microcosm for ecology. Yeast 35(6):417–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3311
doi: 10.1002/yea.3311 pubmed: 29476620
Álvarez-Pérez S, Lievens B, Fukami T (2019) Yeast-bacterium interactions: the next frontier in nectar research. Trends Plant Sci 24(5):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.01.012
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.01.012 pubmed: 30792076
Klaps J, Lievens B, Álvarez-Pérez S (2020) Towards a better understanding of the role of nectar-inhabiting yeasts in plant-animal interactions. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 7:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0091-8
doi: 10.1186/s40694-019-0091-8 pubmed: 31921433 pmcid: 6947986
Hausmann SL, Tietjen B, Rillig MC (2017) Solving the puzzle of yeast survival in ephemeral nectar systems: exponential growth is not enough. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93(12):fix150. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix150
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix150
Vannette RL, Fukami T (2017) Dispersal enhances beta diversity in nectar microbes. Ecol Lett 20(7):901–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12787
doi: 10.1111/ele.12787 pubmed: 28597955
Pozo MI, Bartlewicz J, van Oystaeyen A, Benavente A, van Kemenade G, Wäckers F, Jacquemyn H (2018) Surviving in the absence of flowers: do nectar yeasts rely on overwintering bumblebee queens to complete their annual life cycle? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94(12):fiy196. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy196
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy196
Tsuji K, Fukami T (2018) Community-wide consequences of sexual dimorphism: evidence from nectar microbes in dioecious plants. Ecology 99(11):2476–2484 doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2494
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2494
Herrera CM, Canto A, Pozo MI, Bazaga P (2010) Inhospitable sweetness: nectar filtering of pollinator-borne inocula leads to impoverished, phylogenetically clustered yeast communities. Proc Biol Sci 277(1682):747–754. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1485
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1485 pubmed: 19889702
Herrera CM (2017) Scavengers that fit beneath a microscope lens. Ecology 98(10):2725–2726. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1874
doi: 10.1002/ecy.1874 pubmed: 28605015
Lievens B, Hallsworth JE, Pozo MI, Ben Belgacem Z, Stevenson A, Willems KA, Jacquemyn H (2015) Microbiology of sugar-rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints. Environ Microbiol 17(2):278–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12570
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12570 pubmed: 25041632
Pozo MI, Lachance MA, Herrera CM (2012) Nectar yeasts of two southern Spanish plants: the roles of immigration and physiological traits in community assembly. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80(2):281–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01286.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01286.x pubmed: 22224447
Pozo MI, Herrera CM, Van den Ende W, Verstrepen K, Lievens B, Jacquemyn H (2015) The impact of nectar chemical features on phenotypic variation in two related nectar yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91(6):fiv055. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv055
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv055 pubmed: 25994159
Pozo MI, Jacquemyn H (2019) Addition of pollen increases growth of nectar-living yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366(15):fnz191. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnz191
doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz191 pubmed: 31550375
Herrera CM, Pérez R, Alonso C (2006) Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb. Am J Bot 93(4):575–581. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.4.575
doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.4.575 pubmed: 21646218
Canto A, Pérez R, Medrano M, Castellanos MC, Herrera CM (2007) Intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in two Aquilegia species (Ranunculaceae): contrasting patterns under field and greenhouse conditions. Ann Bot 99(4):653–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl291
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl291 pubmed: 17259227 pmcid: 2802931
Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW (2007) Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and Nectar. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, pp 215–264
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_5
Pozo MI, Herrera CM, Lachance MA, Verstrepen K, Lievens B, Jacquemyn H (2016) Species coexistence in simple microbial communities: unravelling the phenotypic landscape of co-occurring Metschnikowia species in floral nectar. Environ Microbiol 18(6):1850–1862. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13037
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13037 pubmed: 26337395
Peay KG, Belisle M (1729) Fukami T (2012) Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities. Proc Biol Sci 279:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1230
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1230
Dhami MK, Hartwig T, Fukami T (2016) Genetic basis of priority effects: insights from nectar yeast. Proc Biol Sci 283(1840):20161455. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1455
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1455 pubmed: 27708148 pmcid: 5069511
Fridman S, Izhaki I, Gerchman Y, Halpern M (2012) Bacterial communities in floral nectar. Environ Microbiol Rep 4(1):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00309.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00309.x pubmed: 23757235
Álvarez-Pérez S, Herrera CM (2013) Composition, richness and nonrandom assembly of culturable bacterial-microfungal communities in floral nectar of Mediterranean plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 83(3):685–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12027
doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12027 pubmed: 23057414
Álvarez-Pérez S, Lievens B, Jacquemyn H, Herrera CM (2013) Acinetobacter nectaris sp. nov. and Acinetobacter boissieri sp. nov., isolated from floral nectar of wild Mediterranean insect-pollinated plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63(Pt 4):1532–1539. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.043489-0
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.043489-0 pubmed: 22904213
Sharaby Y, Rodríguez-Martínez S, Lalzar M, Halpern M, Izhaki I (2020) Geographic partitioning or environmental selection: what governs the global distribution of bacterial communities inhabiting floral nectar? Sci Total Environ 749:142305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142305
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142305 pubmed: 33370885
Samuni-Blank M, Izhaki I, Laviad S, Bar-Massada A, Gerchman Y, Halpern M (2014) The role of abiotic environmental conditions and herbivory in shaping bacterial community composition in floral nectar. PLoS One 9(6):e99107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099107
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099107 pubmed: 24922317 pmcid: 4055640
Kim PS, Shin NR, Kim JY, Yun JH, Hyun DW, Bae JW (2014) Acinetobacter apis sp. nov., isolated from the intestinal tract of a honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Microbiol 52(8):639–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-014-4078-0
doi: 10.1007/s12275-014-4078-0 pubmed: 25098562
Touchon M, Cury J, Yoon EJ, Krizova L, Cerqueira GC, Murphy C, Feldgarden M, Wortman J, Clermont D, Lambert T, Grillot-Courvalin C, Nemec A, Courvalin P, Rocha EPC (2014) The genomic diversification of the whole Acinetobacter genus: origins, mechanisms, and consequences. Genome Biol Evol 6(10):2866–2882. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu225
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu225 pubmed: 25313016 pmcid: 4224351
Engel P, Moran NA (2013) The gut microbiota of insects - diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(5):699–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12025
doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12025 pubmed: 23692388
Van Assche A, Álvarez-Pérez S, de Breij A, De Brabanter J, Willems KA, Dijkshoorn L, Lievens B (2017) Phylogenetic signal in phenotypic traits related to carbon source assimilation and chemical sensitivity in Acinetobacter species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(1):367–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7866-0
doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7866-0 pubmed: 27734121
Cools P, Nemec A, Kämpfer VM (2019) Acinetobacter, Chryseobacterium, Moraxella, and other nonfermentative Gram-negative rods. In: Carroll KC, Pfaller MA, Landry ML, McAdam AJ, Patel R, Richter SS, Warnock DW (eds) Manual of Clinical Microbiology12th edn. ASM Press, Washington D.C., pp 829–857
La Scola B, Gundi VA, Khamis A, Raoult D (2006) Sequencing of the rpoB gene and flanking spacers for molecular identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin Microbiol 44(3):827–832. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.3.827-832.2006
doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.827-832.2006 pubmed: 16517861 pmcid: 1393131
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5):1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 pubmed: 15034147 pmcid: 390337
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 pubmed: 5967553 pmcid: 5967553
Petanidou T (2007) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and Nectar. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, pp 343–375
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_8
Farrugia DN, Elbourne LD, Hassan KA, Eijkelkamp BA, Tetu SG, Brown MH, Shah BS, Peleg AY, Mabbutt BC, Paulsen IT (2013) The complete genome and phenome of a community-acquired Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS One 8(3):e58628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058628
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058628 pubmed: 23527001 pmcid: 3602452
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 8 Apr 2020
Lin L (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532051
doi: 10.2307/2532051
Lin L (2000) A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 56:324–325
doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00324.x
Stevenson M., Nunes T, Heuer C, Marshall J, Sanchez J, Thornton R, Reiczigel J, Robison-Cox J, Sebastiani P, Solymos P, Yoshida K, Jones G, Pirikahu S, Firestone S, Kyle R, Popp J, Jay M, Reynard C (2020) epiR: Tools for the analysis of epidemiological data. R package version 1.0-14. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=epiR . Accessed 8 Apr 2020
Kampstra P (2008) Beanplot: a boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. J Stat Softw 28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.c01
doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.c01
Harrell FE, Dupont C, et al (2019) Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.3-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc . Accessed 8 Apr 2020
Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125(1):1–15 www.jstor.org/stable/2461605
doi: 10.1086/284325
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412
Garland Jr T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol 42(3):265–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265
Revell LJ (2012) Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/44766
doi: 10.1038/44766 pubmed: 10553904
Blomberg SP, Garland Jr T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x pubmed: 12778543
Münkemüller T, Lavergne S, Bzeznik B, Dray S, Jombart T, Schiffers K, Thuiller W (2012) How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol Evol 3:743–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00196.x
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00196.x
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, HelmusMR CWK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166 pubmed: 20395285
Kamilar JM, Cooper N (2013) Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120341. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0341
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0341 pubmed: 23569289 pmcid: 3638444
Molina-Venegas R, Rodríguez MA (2017) Revisiting phylogenetic signal; strong or negligible impacts of polytomies and branch length information? BMC Evol Biol 17(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0898-y
doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0898-y pubmed: 28201989 pmcid: 5312541
Harmon LJ, Weir JT, Brock CD, Glor RE, Challenger W (2008) GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24:129–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538 pubmed: 18006550
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Narwani A, Alexandrou MA, Herrin J, Vouaux A, Zhou C, Oakley TH, Cardinale BJ (2015) Common ancestry is a poor predictor of competitive traits in freshwater green algae. PLoS One 10(9):e0137085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137085
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137085 pubmed: 26348482 pmcid: 4562640
Revell LJ (2013) Two new graphical methods for mapping trait evolution on phylogenies. Methods Ecol Evol 4(8):754–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12066
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12066
Revell LJ, Schliep K, Valderrama E, Richardson JE (2018) Graphs in phylogenetic comparative analysis: Anscombe’s quartet revisited. Methods Ecol Evol 9(10):2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13067
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13067
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2019) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan . Accessed 8 Apr 2020
Estrela S, Vila JCC, Lu N, Bajic D, Rebolleda-Gomez M, Chang C-Y, Sanchez A (2020) Metabolic rules of microbial community assembly. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.09.984278
Goldford JE, Lu N, Bajić D, Estrela S, Tikhonov M, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, Segrè D, Mehta P, Sanchez A (2018) Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science 361(6401):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1168
doi: 10.1126/science.aat1168 pubmed: 30072533 pmcid: 6405290
Herrero A, Flores E, Imperial J (2019) Nitrogen assimilation in bacteria. In: Schmidt TM (ed) Encyclopedia of Microbiology4th edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 280–300
Dhami MK, Hartwig T, Letten AD, Banf M, Fukami T (2018) Genomic diversity of a nectar yeast clusters into metabolically, but not geographically, distinct lineages. Mol Ecol 27(8):2067–2076. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14535
doi: 10.1111/mec.14535 pubmed: 29446179
Cooper RM, Tsimring L, Hasty J (2017) Inter-species population dynamics enhance microbial horizontal gene transfer and spread of antibiotic resistance. Elife 6:e25950. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25950
doi: 10.7554/eLife.25950 pubmed: 29091031 pmcid: 5701796
Geisinger E, Isberg RR (2015) Antibiotic modulation of capsular exopolysaccharide and virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog 11(2):e1004691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004691
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004691 pubmed: 25679516 pmcid: 4334535
Roguz K, Bajguz A, Chmur M, Gołębiewska A, Roguz A, Zych M (2019) Diversity of nectar amino acids in the Fritillaria (Liliaceae) genus: ecological and evolutionary implications. Sci Rep 9(1):15209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51170-4
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51170-4 pubmed: 31645686 pmcid: 6811550
Vannette RL, Fukami T (2018) Contrasting effects of yeasts and bacteria on floral nectar traits. Ann Bot 121(7):1343–1349. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy032
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy032 pubmed: 29562323 pmcid: 6007235
Hess DC, Lu W, Rabinowitz JD, Botstein D (2006) Ammonium toxicity and potassium limitation in yeast. PLoS Biol 4(11):e351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040351
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040351 pubmed: 17048990 pmcid: 1609136
Ponomarova O, Gabrielli N, Sévin DC, Mülleder M, Zirngibl K, Bulyha K, Andrejev S, Kafkia E, Typas A, Sauer U, Ralser M, Patil KR (2017) Yeast creates a niche for symbiotic lactic acid bacteria through nitrogen overflow. Cell Syst 5(4):345–357.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2017.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.09.002 pubmed: 28964698 pmcid: 5660601
Wu Q, Cui K, Lin J, Zhu Y, Xu Y (2017) Urea production by yeasts other than Saccharomyces in food fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 17(7):fox072. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fox072
doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox072
Tucker CM, Fukami T (2014) Environmental variability counteracts priority effects to facilitate species coexistence: evidence from nectar microbes. Proc Biol Sci 281(1778):20132637. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2637
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2637 pubmed: 24430846 pmcid: 3906935
Herrera CM, Pozo MI, Bazaga P (2012) Jack of all nectars, master of most: DNA methylation and the epigenetic basis of niche width in a flower-living yeast. Mol Ecol 21(11):2602–2616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05402.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05402.x pubmed: 22171717
Álvarez-Pérez S, Dhami MK, Pozo MI, Crauwels S, Verstrepen KJ, Herrera CM, Lievens B, Jacquemyn H (2021) Genetic admixture increases phenotypic diversity in the nectar yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii. Fungal Ecol 49:101016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2020.101016
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2020.101016

Auteurs

Sergio Álvarez-Pérez (S)

Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), KU Leuven, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium. sergioaperez@ucm.es.
Department of Animal Health, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain. sergioaperez@ucm.es.

Kaoru Tsuji (K)

Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, Hirano 2, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2113, Japan.

Marion Donald (M)

Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.

Ado Van Assche (A)

Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), KU Leuven, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.

Rachel L Vannette (RL)

Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Carlos M Herrera (CM)

Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, 41092, Sevilla, Spain.

Hans Jacquemyn (H)

Biology Department, Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Population Biology, KU Leuven, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium.

Tadashi Fukami (T)

Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Bart Lievens (B)

Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), KU Leuven, B-3001, Leuven, Belgium. bart.lievens@kuleuven.be.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH