Differentiating axonal loss and demyelination in chronic MS lesions: A novel approach using single streamline diffusivity analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
01
09
2020
accepted:
16
12
2020
entrez:
6
1
2021
pubmed:
7
1
2021
medline:
12
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We describe a new single-streamline based approach to analyse diffusivity within chronic MS lesions. We used the proposed method to examine diffusivity profiles in 30 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis and observed a significant increase of both RD and AD within the lesion core (0.38+/-0.09 μm2/ms and 0.30+/-0.12 μm2/ms respectively, p<0.0001 for both) that gradually and symmetrically diminished away from the lesion. T1-hypointensity derived axonal loss correlated highly with ΔAD (r = 0.82, p<0.0001), but moderately with ΔRD (r = 0.60, p<0.0001). Furthermore, the trendline of the ΔAD vs axonal loss intersected both axes at zero indicating close agreement between two measures in assessing the degree of axonal loss. Conversely, the trendline of the ΔRD function demonstrated a high positive value at the zero level of axonal loss, suggesting that even lesions with preserved axonal content exhibit a significant increase of RD. There was also a significant negative correlation between the level of preferential RD increase (ΔRD-ΔAD) in the lesion core and the degree of axonal damage (r = -0.62, p<0.001), indicating that ΔRD dominates in cases with milder axonal loss. Modelling diffusivity changes in the core of chronic MS lesions based on the direct proportionality of ΔAD with axonal loss and the proposed dual nature of ΔRD yielded results that were strikingly similar to the experimental data. Evaluation of lesions in a sizable cohort of MS patients using the proposed method supports the use of ΔAD as a marker of axonal loss; and the notion that demyelination and axonal loss independently contribute to the increase of RD in chronic MS lesions. The work highlights the importance of selecting appropriate patient cohorts for clinical trials of pro-remyelinating and neuroprotective therapeutics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33406139
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244766
pii: PONE-D-20-27494
pmc: PMC7787472
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0244766Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Study was partially funded by Novartis. This funds was used exclusively for MRI data acquisition. None of the authors were employed or recieved consultancy from commercial entity or participated in patents, products development or marketing. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(1):69-83
pubmed: 24577476
Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:239-253
pubmed: 30086412
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2481-2489
pubmed: 29029896
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1454-60
pubmed: 21238597
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Nov;34(11):2747-66
pubmed: 22611035
Arch Neurol. 2009 Aug;66(8):998-1006
pubmed: 19667222
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 May;68(5):627-32
pubmed: 10766895
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49790
pubmed: 23166771
Brain. 2011 Aug;134(Pt 8):2248-60
pubmed: 21764818
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Mar;16(3):189-199
pubmed: 28229892
Neuroimage. 2013 Jul 1;74:298-305
pubmed: 23481461
Magn Reson Med. 2009 May;61(5):1255-60
pubmed: 19253405
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Jul 05;12:219-26
pubmed: 27489769
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;13(12):1092-9
pubmed: 16319302
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0194142
pubmed: 29694345
Brain. 2015 May;138(Pt 5):1223-38
pubmed: 25724201
Neuroimage. 2005 May 15;26(1):132-40
pubmed: 15862213
CNS Drugs. 2018 Dec;32(12):1159-1171
pubmed: 30267385
Med Image Anal. 2019 Dec;58:101559
pubmed: 31542711
Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1282-8
pubmed: 9595975
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Sep;36(9):3687-702
pubmed: 26096639
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1000-16
pubmed: 22484410
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0122114
pubmed: 25807541
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2241-54
pubmed: 22001791
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Nov;52(5):965-78
pubmed: 15508168