Cystic fibrosis in Tuscany: evolution of newborn screening strategies over time to the present.

CFTR allelic heterogeneity Cystic fibrosis DNA molecular analysis Immunoreactive trypsinogen Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis CF NBS

Journal

Italian journal of pediatrics
ISSN: 1824-7288
Titre abrégé: Ital J Pediatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 08 07 2020
accepted: 04 12 2020
entrez: 7 1 2021
pubmed: 8 1 2021
medline: 3 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease affecting about 1:3000 newborns in Caucasian populations. The introduction of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF NBS) has improved the clinical outcomes of individuals with CF through early diagnosis and early treatment. NBS strategies have been implemented over time. CF NBS was introduced extensively in 1984 in Tuscany, a region with 3.7 million people, characterized by a high allelic heterogeneity of CFTR gene. The aim of the study is to present the results from 34 years (1984-2018) of CF NBS, retrospectively evaluating the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the tests. In particular, we studied the impact of the introduction of DNA molecular analysis in NBS in a region with high allelic heterogeneity, such as Tuscany. Over these 34 years, 919,520 neonates were screened, using four different NBS strategies. From 1984 to 1991, CF NBS was performed by the determination of albumin on dried meconium (sensitivity 68.75%; specificity 99.82%). Subsequently, the analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen on a blood spot was adopted as CF NBS protocol (sensitivity 83.33%; specificity 99.77%). From 1992 to 2010, this strategy was associated with lactase meconium dosage: IRT1/IRT2 + LACT protocol (sensitivity 87.50%; specificity 99.82%). From 2011, when the existing algorithm was integrated by analysis of CF causing variants of the CFTR gene (IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA protocol), a substantial improvement in sensitivity was seen (senisitivity 96.15%; specificity 99.75%). Other improved parameters with DNA analysis in the NBS programme, compared with the previous method, were the diagnosis time (52 days vs. 38 days) and the recall rate (0.58 to 0.38%). The inclusion of DNA analysis in the NBS was a fundamental step in improving sensitivity, even in a region with high allelic variability.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease affecting about 1:3000 newborns in Caucasian populations. The introduction of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF NBS) has improved the clinical outcomes of individuals with CF through early diagnosis and early treatment. NBS strategies have been implemented over time. CF NBS was introduced extensively in 1984 in Tuscany, a region with 3.7 million people, characterized by a high allelic heterogeneity of CFTR gene.
AIM AND METHODS OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study is to present the results from 34 years (1984-2018) of CF NBS, retrospectively evaluating the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the tests. In particular, we studied the impact of the introduction of DNA molecular analysis in NBS in a region with high allelic heterogeneity, such as Tuscany.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over these 34 years, 919,520 neonates were screened, using four different NBS strategies. From 1984 to 1991, CF NBS was performed by the determination of albumin on dried meconium (sensitivity 68.75%; specificity 99.82%). Subsequently, the analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen on a blood spot was adopted as CF NBS protocol (sensitivity 83.33%; specificity 99.77%). From 1992 to 2010, this strategy was associated with lactase meconium dosage: IRT1/IRT2 + LACT protocol (sensitivity 87.50%; specificity 99.82%). From 2011, when the existing algorithm was integrated by analysis of CF causing variants of the CFTR gene (IRT1/IRT2 + LACT + IRT1/DNA protocol), a substantial improvement in sensitivity was seen (senisitivity 96.15%; specificity 99.75%). Other improved parameters with DNA analysis in the NBS programme, compared with the previous method, were the diagnosis time (52 days vs. 38 days) and the recall rate (0.58 to 0.38%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The inclusion of DNA analysis in the NBS was a fundamental step in improving sensitivity, even in a region with high allelic variability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33407736
doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00948-8
pii: 10.1186/s13052-020-00948-8
pmc: PMC7788805
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2

Références

Clin Biochem. 2013 Jan;46(1-2):133-8
pubmed: 23010448
J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;181S:S45-S51.e1
pubmed: 28129812
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Oct;18(10):1084-9
pubmed: 20512163
Arch Dis Child. 1974 Aug;49(8):597-601
pubmed: 4213834
J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;181S:S33-S44.e2
pubmed: 28129810
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e338-46
pubmed: 19171585
Acta Paediatr. 1997 May;86(5):497-502
pubmed: 9183489
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1992 Jun;13(3):181-6
pubmed: 1613113
J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;155(5):618-22
pubmed: 19540513
Ital J Pediatr. 2018 Jan 3;44(1):2
pubmed: 29298718
Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):616-26
pubmed: 7680526
Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2):169-75
pubmed: 7920636
J Cyst Fibros. 2018 May;17(3):306-315
pubmed: 29572018
J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;181S:S4-S15.e1
pubmed: 28129811
Science. 1989 Sep 8;245(4922):1066-73
pubmed: 2475911
Pediatrics. 1990 Jun;85(6):1001-7
pubmed: 2187173
Lancet. 2007 Apr 7;369(9568):1146-7
pubmed: 17416243
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jan;8(1):65-124
pubmed: 31570318
J Pediatr. 1983 Mar;102(3):383-7
pubmed: 6827410
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Apr;93(4):357-8
pubmed: 18356397
J Cyst Fibros. 2017 Mar;16(2):207-213
pubmed: 28043799
J Cyst Fibros. 2007 Jan;6(1):57-65
pubmed: 16870510
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Jul;18(4):484-490
pubmed: 31005549
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Aug;4(8):653-661
pubmed: 27053341
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Jul 01;10(7):
pubmed: 32630227
J Cyst Fibros. 2018 Mar;17(2):153-178
pubmed: 29506920
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2015 Oct;9(5):619-31
pubmed: 26366807
Epidemiol Prev. 2019 Jul-Aug;43(4S1):1-36
pubmed: 31370382

Auteurs

Matteo Botti (M)

Tuscany Support Cystic Fibrosis Service, Department of Pediatrics, Leghorn Hospital, Leghorn, Italy.

Vito Terlizzi (V)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Michela Francalanci (M)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Daniela Dolce (D)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Maria Chiara Cavicchi (MC)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Anna Silvia Neri (AS)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Valeria Galici (V)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Gianfranco Mergni (G)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Lucia Zavataro (L)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Claudia Centrone (C)

Diagnostic Genetics Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Filippo Festini (F)

Department of Pediatrics, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Giovanni Taccetti (G)

Tuscany Referral Cystic Fibrosis Center, Anna Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy. giovanni.taccetti@meyer.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH