Physician-led prehospital management is associated with reduced mortality in severe blunt trauma patients: a retrospective analysis of the Japanese nationwide trauma registry.
Clinical assessment
Emergency medical service
Helicopter emergency medical service
Prehospital care
Prehospital time
Wounds and injuries
Journal
Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine
ISSN: 1757-7241
Titre abrégé: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101477511
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2021
06 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
29
08
2020
accepted:
18
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
26
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although the results of previous studies suggested the effectiveness of physician-led prehospital trauma management, it has been uncertain because of the limited number of high-quality studies. Furthermore, the advantage of physician-led prehospital management might have been overestimated due to the shortened prehospital time by helicopter transportation in some studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of physician-led prehospital management independent of prehospital time. Also, subgroup analysis was performed to explore the subpopulation that especially benefit from physician-led prehospital management. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of Japan's nationwide trauma registry. Severe blunt trauma patients, defined by Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16, who were transported directly to a hospital between April 2009 and March 2019 were evaluated. In-hospital mortality was compared between groups dichotomized by the occupation of primary prehospital healthcare provider (i.e., physician or paramedic), using 1:4 propensity score-matched analysis. The propensity score was calculated using potential confounders including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, vital signs at the scene of injury, ISS, and total time from injury to hospital arrival. Subpopulations that especially benefit from physician-led prehospital management were explored by assessing interaction effects between physician-led prehospital management and patient characteristics. A total of 30,551 patients (physician-led: 2976, paramedic-led: 27,575) were eligible for analysis, of whom 2690 propensity score-matched pairs (physician-led: 2690, paramedic-led: 10,760) were generated and compared. Physician-led group showed significantly decreased in-hospital mortality than paramedic-led group (in-hospital mortality: 387 [14.4%] and 1718 [16.0%]; odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.88 [0.78-1.00], p = 0.044). Patients with age < 65 years, ISS ≥25, Abbreviated Injury Scale in pelvis and lower extremities ≥3, and total prehospital time < 60 min were likely to benefit from physician-led prehospital management. Physician-led prehospital trauma management was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality independent of prehospital time. The findings of exploratory subgroup analysis would be useful for the future research to establish efficient dispatch system of physician team.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although the results of previous studies suggested the effectiveness of physician-led prehospital trauma management, it has been uncertain because of the limited number of high-quality studies. Furthermore, the advantage of physician-led prehospital management might have been overestimated due to the shortened prehospital time by helicopter transportation in some studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of physician-led prehospital management independent of prehospital time. Also, subgroup analysis was performed to explore the subpopulation that especially benefit from physician-led prehospital management.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data of Japan's nationwide trauma registry. Severe blunt trauma patients, defined by Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16, who were transported directly to a hospital between April 2009 and March 2019 were evaluated. In-hospital mortality was compared between groups dichotomized by the occupation of primary prehospital healthcare provider (i.e., physician or paramedic), using 1:4 propensity score-matched analysis. The propensity score was calculated using potential confounders including patient demographics, mechanism of injury, vital signs at the scene of injury, ISS, and total time from injury to hospital arrival. Subpopulations that especially benefit from physician-led prehospital management were explored by assessing interaction effects between physician-led prehospital management and patient characteristics.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 30,551 patients (physician-led: 2976, paramedic-led: 27,575) were eligible for analysis, of whom 2690 propensity score-matched pairs (physician-led: 2690, paramedic-led: 10,760) were generated and compared. Physician-led group showed significantly decreased in-hospital mortality than paramedic-led group (in-hospital mortality: 387 [14.4%] and 1718 [16.0%]; odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.88 [0.78-1.00], p = 0.044). Patients with age < 65 years, ISS ≥25, Abbreviated Injury Scale in pelvis and lower extremities ≥3, and total prehospital time < 60 min were likely to benefit from physician-led prehospital management.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Physician-led prehospital trauma management was significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality independent of prehospital time. The findings of exploratory subgroup analysis would be useful for the future research to establish efficient dispatch system of physician team.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407748
doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00828-4
pii: 10.1186/s13049-020-00828-4
pmc: PMC7789566
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9Références
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81
pubmed: 9802183
BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):217-22
pubmed: 7627033
Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1520-6
pubmed: 15455361
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 15;25(1):94
pubmed: 28915898
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1838-42
pubmed: 22695322
Emerg Med J. 2015 Nov;32(11):869-75
pubmed: 25795741
J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1134-41
pubmed: 17099519
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):32-40
pubmed: 27586065
Accid Anal Prev. 2001 Jan;33(1):129-38
pubmed: 11189116
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1605-1610
pubmed: 30442432
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):978-989
pubmed: 31335754
JAMA. 1987 Jun 19;257(23):3246-50
pubmed: 3586248
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R34
pubmed: 21251331
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Apr 29;24:62
pubmed: 27130216
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 29;3(4):
pubmed: 23633419
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Oct;69(10):697-701
pubmed: 10527344
JAMA Surg. 2019 Dec 1;154(12):1117-1124
pubmed: 31553431
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Nov 29;24(1):140
pubmed: 27899124
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):965-974
pubmed: 28590350
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;73(3):281-290
pubmed: 30447945