Partnering with general practitioners to optimize survivorship for patients with lymphoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial (the GOSPEL I trial).
Hematology
Lymphoma
Protocol
Quality of life
Randomized controlled trial
Shared care
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2021
06 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
17
06
2020
accepted:
01
12
2020
entrez:
7
1
2021
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia's Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma. We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed. This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors. Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921 . Registered on 22 May 2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Survival rates for lymphoma are highest amongst hematological malignancies. In 2019, it was estimated that over 6400 Australians were diagnosed with lymphoma, a group of hematological malignancies with a high 5-year survival rate of ~ 76%. There is an increased focus on the promotion of wellness in survivorship and active approaches to reducing morbidity related to treatment; however, current models of follow-up care heavily rely on hospital-based specialist-led care. Maximizing the potential of general practitioners (GPs) in the ongoing management of cancer is consistent with the national health reform principles and the Cancer Council Australia's Optimal Care Pathways. GPs are well positioned to provide guideline-based follow-up care and are more likely to address comorbidities and psychosocial issues and promote healthy lifestyle behaviors. This study aims to test the feasibility of the GOSPEL I intervention for implementing an integrated, shared care model in which cancer center specialists and community-based GPs collaborate to provide survivorship care for patients with lymphoma.
METHODS
METHODS
We describe a protocol for a phase II, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation. Sixty patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma will be randomized to usual specialist-led follow-up care (as determined by the treating hematologists) or a shared follow-up care intervention (i.e., GOSPEL I). GOSPEL I is a nurse-enabled, pre-specified shared care pathway with follow-up responsibilities shared between cancer center specialists (i.e., hematologists and specialist cancer nurses) and GPs. Outcome measures assess feasibility as well as a range of patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma, patient experience of care, symptom distress, comorbidity burden, dietary intake, physical activity behaviors, financial distress/interference, and satisfaction of care. Safety indicators including hospital admission and unscheduled lymphoma clinic visits as well as process outcomes such as intervention fidelity and economic indicators will be analyzed.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This trial is designed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of a new model of shared care for lymphoma survivors. Patient-reported outcomes as well as potential barriers to implementation will be analyzed to inform a larger definitive clinical trial testing the effects and implementation of a shared care model on health-related quality of life of lymphoma survivors.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000594921 . Registered on 22 May 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33407797
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04945-4
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-04945-4
pmc: PMC7787240
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Subventions
Organisme : Health Innovation, Investment and Research Office
ID : N/A
Références
Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 May;49(5):288-292
pubmed: 32416654
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4677-4686
pubmed: 31955276
Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(12):3109
pubmed: 28327933
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v91-v102
pubmed: 27377716
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):418-27
pubmed: 22966105
Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Sep;54(9):1942-6
pubmed: 23320888
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;14(2):e181-e192
pubmed: 28371441
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Sep;12(3):347-354
pubmed: 32913003
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Aug;22(8):394-402
pubmed: 20670264
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51
pubmed: 15367063
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977 Mar;35(3):125-39
pubmed: 15093
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv19-iv29
pubmed: 29796651
Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1447-58
pubmed: 25691361
Aust Fam Physician. 2014 Aug;43(8):521-5
pubmed: 25114985
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91
pubmed: 18183564
Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(9):1326-36
pubmed: 7999421
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):848-55
pubmed: 16418496
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3485-3488
pubmed: 32451702
Cancer Med. 2016 Sep;5(9):2198-204
pubmed: 27356781
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;11(1):38-48
pubmed: 24247164
Cancer Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;41(2):89-90
pubmed: 29462073
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):156-63
pubmed: 12687505
Psychooncology. 2011 Nov;20(11):1193-201
pubmed: 22012943