Breast density, benign breast disease, and risk of breast cancer over time.
Benign breast disease
Breast neoplasms
Longitudinal studies
Mammographic density
Mass screening
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
09
03
2020
accepted:
09
11
2020
revised:
06
10
2020
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
24
6
2021
entrez:
7
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assessing the combined effect of mammographic density and benign breast disease is of utmost importance to design personalized screening strategies. We analyzed individual-level data from 294,943 women aged 50-69 years with at least one mammographic screening participation in any of four areas of the Spanish Breast Cancer Screening Program from 1995 to 2015, and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox models to assess the association between benign breast disease, breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. During a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 3697 (1.25%) women had a breast cancer diagnosis and 5941 (2.01%) had a benign breast disease. More than half of screened women had scattered fibroglandular density (55.0%). The risk of breast cancer independently increased with the presence of benign breast disease and with the increase in breast density (p for interaction = 0.84). Women with benign breast disease and extremely dense breasts had a threefold elevated risk of breast cancer compared with those with scattered fibroglandular density and without benign breast disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.07; 95%CI = 2.01-4.68). Heterogeneous density and benign breast disease was associated with nearly a 2.5 elevated risk (HR = 2.48; 95%CI = 1.66-3.70). Those with extremely dense breast without a benign breast disease had a 2.27 increased risk (95%CI = 2.07-2.49). Women with benign breast disease had an elevated risk for over 15 years independently of their breast density category. Women with benign breast disease and dense breasts are at high risk for future breast cancer. • Benign breast disease and breast density were independently associated with breast cancer. • Women with benign breast disease had an elevated risk for up to 15 years independently of their mammographic density category.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33409776
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07490-5
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-07490-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4839-4847Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Salud Carlos III
ID : PI15/00098
Organisme : Instituto de Salud Carlos III
ID : PI17/00047
Références
Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 7(12):1133–1144
Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M (1987) Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148(6):1087–1092
doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.6.1087
Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J et al (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(21):1622–1629
doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622
McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(6):1159–1169
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
Castells X, Domingo L, Corominas JM et al (2015) Breast cancer risk after diagnosis by screening mammography of nonproliferative or proliferative benign breast disease: a study from a population-based screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 149(1):237–244
doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3208-z
Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR (2011) Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med 155(1):10–20
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003
Vilaprinyo E, Forne C, Carles M et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit analyses of risk-based screening strategies for breast cancer. PLoS One 9(2):e86858
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086858
Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA et al (2001) Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12(2):103–110
doi: 10.1023/A:1008935821885
Tice JA, O’Meara ES, Weaver DL, Vachon C, Ballard-Barbash R, Kerlikowske K (2013) Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(14):1043–1049
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt124
Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Trnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Available from: http://screening.iarc.fr/doc/ND7306954ENC_002.pdf
Castells X, Sala M, Ascunce N, Salas D, Zubizarreta R, Casamitjana M (2007) Descripción del cribado del cáncer en España. Proyecto DESCRIC. Madrid: Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Agència d’Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèiques de Cataluña; 2006. Available from: http://aunets.isciii.es/ficherosproductos/70/AATRM%202006-01.pdf
Ascunce N, Salas D, Zubizarreta R, Almazan R, Ibanez J, Ederra M (2010) Cancer screening in Spain. Annonc Suppl 21(Suppl 3):iii43–iii51
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq085
Baré M, Bonfill X, Andreu X (2006) Relationship between the method of detection and prognostic factors for breast cancer in a community with a screening programme. J Med Screen 13(4):183–191
doi: 10.1177/096914130601300405
Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
Zheng Y, Heagerty PJ (2005) Partly conditional survival models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 61(2):379–391
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00323.x
Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K (2005) Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94(2):115–122
doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-5152-4
Vacek PM, Geller BM (2004) A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(5):715–722
Ziv E, Shepherd J, Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K (2003) Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(7):556–558
doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.7.556
Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(3):229–237
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044383
Tice JA, Miglioretti DL, Li C-S, Vachon CM, Gard CC, Kerlikowske K (2015) Breast density and benign breast disease: risk assessment to identify women at high risk of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3137–3143
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8869
Brentnall AR, Harkness EF, Astley SM et al (2015) Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):147
doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5
Brinton JT, Hendrick RE, Ringham BM, Kriege M, Glueck DH (2019) Improving the diagnostic accuracy of a stratified screening strategy by identifying the optimal risk cutoff. Cancer Causes Control 30(10):1145–1155
doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01208-9
MyPeBs. Randomized comparison of risk-stratified versus standard breast cancer screening in European women aged 40–70 (MyPeBS). 2017.
Esserman LJ, WISDOM Study and Athena Investigators (2017) The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate. NPJ Breast Cancer 3:34
Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A et al (2005) Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast Edinb Scotl 14(4):269–275
Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J et al (1998) Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23):1801–1809
doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.23.1801
Redondo A, Comas M, Macia F et al (2012) Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms. Br J Radiol 85(1019):1465–1470
doi: 10.1259/bjr/21256379
Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL et al (2007) Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(5):386–395
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk066
Sartor H, Lang K, Rosso A, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Timberg P (2016) Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists’ qualitative classification. Eur Radiol 26(12):4354–4360
doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4309-3
Irshad A, Leddy R, Lewis M et al (2017) Changes in breast density reporting patterns of radiologists after publication of the 5th Edition BI-RADS guidelines: a single institution experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209(4):943–948
doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17518
Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S et al (2009) Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(6):384–398
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp018
Sala M, Salas D, Belvis F et al (2011) Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain. Radiology. 258(2):388–395
doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100874
Harvey JA, Gard CC, Miglioretti DL et al (2013) Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition. Radiology. 266(3):752–758
doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120221