Quantitative analysis of dynamic computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after abdominal aorta aneurysm endovascular repair: A feasibility study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 22 05 2020
accepted: 23 12 2020
entrez: 7 1 2021
pubmed: 8 1 2021
medline: 11 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess the feasibility of quantitative analysis of dynamic computed tomography angiography (dCTA) for the detection of endoleaks in patients who underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). Twenty patients scheduled for contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) of the abdominal aorta post-EVAR were prospectively enrolled. All patients received a standard triphasic CTA protocol, followed by an additional dCTA. The dCTA acquisition enabled reconstruction of color-coded maps depicting blood perfusion and a dCTA dataset of the aneurysm sac. Observers assessed the dCTA and dynamic CT perfusion (dCTP) images for the detection of endoleaks, establishing diagnostic confidence based on a modified 5-point Likert scale. An index was calculated for the ratio between the endoleak and aneurysm sac using blood flow for dCTP and Hounsfield units (HU) for dCTA. The Wilcoxon test compared the endoleak index and the diagnostic confidence of the observers. In total, 19 patients (18 males, median age 74 years [70.5-75.7]) were included for analysis. Nine endoleaks were detected in 7 patients using triphasic CTA as the reference standard. There was complete agreement for endoleak detection between the two techniques on a per-patient basis. Both dCTA and dCTP identified an additional endoleak in one patient. The diagnostic confidence using dCTP for detection of endoleaks was not significantly superior to dCTA (5.0 [5-5] vs. 4.5 [4-5], respectively; p = 0.11); however, dCTP demonstrated superior diagnostic confidence for endoleak exclusion compared to dCTA (1.0 [1-1] vs 1.5 [1.5-1.5], respectively; p <0.01). Moreover, the dCTP endoleak index was significantly higher than the dCTA index (18.5 [10.8-20.5] vs. 3.5 [5-2.7], respectively; p = 0.02). Quantitative analysis of dCTP imaging can aid in the detection of endoleaks and demonstrates a higher endoleak detection rate than triphasic CTA, as well as a strong correlation with visual assessment of dCTA images.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33411747
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245134
pii: PONE-D-20-15364
pmc: PMC7790279
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0245134

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Schoepf receives institutional research support from and is a consultant for Bayer, Bracco, Elucid Bioimaging, Guerbet, HeartFlow, and Siemens. Dr. Varga-Szemes receives institutional research support from Siemens and is a consultant for Bayer and Elucid Bioimaging. The other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):641-55
pubmed: 17517926
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1172-1180.e1
pubmed: 24837981
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 31;358(5):464-74
pubmed: 18234751
Semin Vasc Surg. 1999 Dec;12(4):327-38
pubmed: 10651461
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun;10(3):207-14
pubmed: 26851149
Abdom Imaging. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):722-31
pubmed: 16447080
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1881-9
pubmed: 20484396
Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):890-9
pubmed: 23579050
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196578
pubmed: 31290986
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):880-96
pubmed: 19786241
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Apr 7;59(7):1533-56
pubmed: 24614352
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Jul-Aug;32(4):609-15
pubmed: 18664850
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Oct;32(4):739-49
pubmed: 11013038
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Jun;14(3):333-41
pubmed: 17723003
Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):917-26
pubmed: 22623699
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Sep;94:125-132
pubmed: 28712695
Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1168-73
pubmed: 20333388
J Thorac Imaging. 2017 Nov;32(6):W69-W80
pubmed: 29065009
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):881-9
pubmed: 20308486
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Jun;23(6):744-50
pubmed: 22494657
J Thorac Imaging. 2017 Jan;32(1):1-25
pubmed: 27997469
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):74-79.e6
pubmed: 29914838
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1863-71
pubmed: 20382983

Auteurs

Georg Apfaltrer (G)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Francesco Lavra (F)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy.

U Joseph Schoepf (UJ)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Marco Scarabello (M)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Universita degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Ricardo Yamada (R)

Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Marly van Assen (M)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Center for Medical Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Akos Varga-Szemes (A)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Brian E Jacobs (BE)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Maximilian J Bauer (MJ)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

William T Greenberg (WT)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Marcelo Guimaraes (M)

Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Luca Saba (L)

Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy.

Carlo N De Cecco (CN)

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH