Estimates of Alpha/Beta (α/β) Ratios for Individual Late Rectal Toxicity Endpoints: An Analysis of the CHHiP Trial.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal
/ physiopathology
Diarrhea
/ complications
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
/ complications
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Probability
Proctitis
/ complications
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Radiation Injuries
/ complications
Radiation Tolerance
Rectum
/ diagnostic imaging
Urethral Stricture
/ complications
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
received:
06
10
2020
revised:
10
12
2020
accepted:
24
12
2020
pubmed:
8
1
2021
medline:
27
8
2021
entrez:
7
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Changes in fraction size of external beam radiation therapy exert nonlinear effects on subsequent toxicity. Commonly described by the linear-quadratic model, fraction size sensitivity of normal tissues is expressed by the α/β ratio. We sought to study individual α/β ratios for different late rectal effects after prostate external beam radiation therapy. The CHHiP trial (ISRCTN97182923) randomized men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer 1:1:1 to 74 Gy/37 fractions (Fr), 60 Gy/20 Fr, or 57 Gy/19 Fr. Patients in the study had full dosimetric data and zero baseline toxicity. Toxicity scales were amalgamated to 6 bowel endpoints: bleeding, diarrhea, pain, proctitis, sphincter control, and stricture. Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models with or without equivalent dose in 2 Gy/Fr correction were log-likelihood fitted by endpoint, estimating α/β ratios. The α/β ratio estimate sensitivity was assessed using sequential inclusion of dose modifying factors (DMFs): age, diabetes, hypertension, inflammatory bowel or diverticular disease (IBD/diverticular), and hemorrhoids. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were bootstrapped. Likelihood ratio testing of 632 estimator log-likelihoods compared the models. Late rectal α/β ratio estimates (without DMF) ranged from bleeding (G1 + α/β = 1.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.9-2.5 Gy) to sphincter control (G1 + α/β = 3.1 Gy; 95% CI, 1.4-9.1 Gy). Bowel pain modelled poorly (α/β, 3.6 Gy; 95% CI, 0.0-840 Gy). Inclusion of IBD/diverticular disease as a DMF significantly improved fits for stool frequency G2+ (P = .00041) and proctitis G1+ (P = .00046). However, the α/β ratios were similar in these no-DMF versus DMF models for both stool frequency G2+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.5 Gy) and proctitis G1+ (α/β 2.7 Gy vs 2.6 Gy). Frequency-weighted averaging of endpoint α/β ratios produced: G1 + α/β ratio = 2.4 Gy; G2 + α/β ratio = 2.3 Gy. We estimated α/β ratios for several common late adverse effects of rectal radiation therapy. When comparing dose-fractionation schedules, we suggest using late a rectal α/β ratio ≤ 3 Gy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33412260
pii: S0360-3016(20)34737-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.041
pmc: PMC8129972
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN97182923']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
596-608Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A15955
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : SP2312/021
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A25351
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10588
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12518
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 7253
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A9895
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Oct;73(1):21-32
pubmed: 15465142
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-395
pubmed: 31227373
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):43-54
pubmed: 22169269
Radiother Oncol. 1995 Apr;35(1):17-60
pubmed: 7569012
Br J Radiol. 2010 Jul;83(991):554-68
pubmed: 20603408
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 15;79(4):1013-21
pubmed: 20447774
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):251-7
pubmed: 22541966
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):747-54
pubmed: 19540054
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jun;119(3):381-7
pubmed: 27157889
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890
pubmed: 28296582
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Sep 1;66(1):11-9
pubmed: 16757129
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Feb 1;88(2):254-62
pubmed: 24411596
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32
pubmed: 27044935
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 1;91(3):595-603
pubmed: 25596108
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):e211-7
pubmed: 21620579
Med Phys. 1997 Jan;24(1):103-10
pubmed: 9029544
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):291-7
pubmed: 24507766
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1464-71
pubmed: 15927411
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1341-6
pubmed: 7713792
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):e181-5
pubmed: 22677373
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1326-34
pubmed: 26340136
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):1233-42
pubmed: 21664059
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1425-1437
pubmed: 27626365
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1605-16
pubmed: 26522334
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-1543
pubmed: 31540791
Radiother Oncol. 2007 Apr;83(1):31-41
pubmed: 17391791
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):347-51
pubmed: 22119373
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
pubmed: 11113727
Phys Med. 2016 Dec;32(12):1690-1697
pubmed: 27720692
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Sep 7;54(17):5139-53
pubmed: 19661568
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Aug 19;28:117
pubmed: 19689825
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct 31;11(1):144
pubmed: 27799048
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1061-1069
pubmed: 27339116
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S123-9
pubmed: 20171506
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):600-5
pubmed: 21377288
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Jun;135:19-24
pubmed: 31015166
Br J Radiol. 2014 Oct;87(1042):20140343
pubmed: 25138155
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1013-5
pubmed: 15519768
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 20;27(29):6072-92
pubmed: 18800342