Continuous warfarin administration versus heparin bridging therapy in post colorectal polypectomy haemorrhage: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (WHICH study).
Anticoagulants
Colorectal polypectomy
Heparin bridge
Vitamin K antagonist
Warfarin
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jan 2021
07 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
19
08
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
8
1
2021
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Endoscopic removal of colorectal adenoma is considered an effective treatment for reducing the mortality rates associated with colorectal cancer. Warfarin, a type of anticoagulant, is widely used for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism; however, bleeding may increase with its administration after polypectomy. In recent times, a high incidence of bleeding after endoscopic polypectomy has been reported in patients receiving heparin bridge therapy. However, previous studies have not compared the bleeding rate after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy between patients who continued with anticoagulant therapy and those who received heparin bridge therapy. We hypothesised that endoscopic colorectal polypectomy under the novel treatment with continuous warfarin is not inferior to endoscopic colorectal polypectomy under standard treatment with heparin bridge therapy with respect to the rate of postoperative bleeding. This study aims to compare the efficacy of endoscopic colorectal polypectomy with continuous warfarin administration and endoscopic colorectal polypectomy with heparin bridge therapy with respect to the rate of postoperative bleeding. We will conduct a prospective multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of two parallel groups. We will compare patients scheduled to undergo colorectal polypectomy under anticoagulant therapy with warfarin. There will be 2 groups, namely, a standard treatment group (heparin bridge therapy) and the experimental treatment group (continued anticoagulant therapy). The primary outcome measure is the rate of postoperative bleeding. On the contrary, the secondary outcomes include the rate of cumulative bleeding, rate of overt haemorrhage (that does not qualify for the definition of haemorrhage after endoscopic polypectomy), incidence of haemorrhage requiring haemostasis during endoscopic polypectomy, intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic colorectal polypectomy requiring angiography, abdominal surgery and/or blood transfusion, total rate of bleeding, risk factors for postoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, incidence of thromboembolism, prothrombin time-international ratio (PT-INR) 28 days after the surgery, and incidence of serious adverse events. The results of this randomised controlled trial will provide valuable information for the standardisation of management of anticoagulants in patients scheduled to undergo colorectal polypectomy. UMIN-CTR UMIN000023720 . Registered on 22 August 2016.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic removal of colorectal adenoma is considered an effective treatment for reducing the mortality rates associated with colorectal cancer. Warfarin, a type of anticoagulant, is widely used for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolism; however, bleeding may increase with its administration after polypectomy. In recent times, a high incidence of bleeding after endoscopic polypectomy has been reported in patients receiving heparin bridge therapy. However, previous studies have not compared the bleeding rate after endoscopic colorectal polypectomy between patients who continued with anticoagulant therapy and those who received heparin bridge therapy. We hypothesised that endoscopic colorectal polypectomy under the novel treatment with continuous warfarin is not inferior to endoscopic colorectal polypectomy under standard treatment with heparin bridge therapy with respect to the rate of postoperative bleeding. This study aims to compare the efficacy of endoscopic colorectal polypectomy with continuous warfarin administration and endoscopic colorectal polypectomy with heparin bridge therapy with respect to the rate of postoperative bleeding.
METHODS
METHODS
We will conduct a prospective multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of two parallel groups. We will compare patients scheduled to undergo colorectal polypectomy under anticoagulant therapy with warfarin. There will be 2 groups, namely, a standard treatment group (heparin bridge therapy) and the experimental treatment group (continued anticoagulant therapy). The primary outcome measure is the rate of postoperative bleeding. On the contrary, the secondary outcomes include the rate of cumulative bleeding, rate of overt haemorrhage (that does not qualify for the definition of haemorrhage after endoscopic polypectomy), incidence of haemorrhage requiring haemostasis during endoscopic polypectomy, intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic colorectal polypectomy requiring angiography, abdominal surgery and/or blood transfusion, total rate of bleeding, risk factors for postoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, incidence of thromboembolism, prothrombin time-international ratio (PT-INR) 28 days after the surgery, and incidence of serious adverse events.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this randomised controlled trial will provide valuable information for the standardisation of management of anticoagulants in patients scheduled to undergo colorectal polypectomy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
UMIN-CTR UMIN000023720 . Registered on 22 August 2016.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33413599
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04975-y
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-04975-y
pmc: PMC7791998
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Heparin
9005-49-6
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
33Références
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct - Nov;53(10-11):1304-1310
pubmed: 30345853
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jan;59(1):44-8
pubmed: 14722546
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 27;373(9):823-33
pubmed: 26095867
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):1-14
pubmed: 24215155
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 14;168(1):63-9
pubmed: 18195197
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 May;107(5):650-4
pubmed: 22552236
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):799-807
pubmed: 25162886
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1060-70
pubmed: 19889407
Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 May-Jun;38(3):303-9
pubmed: 1607080
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96
pubmed: 22356322
N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30;329(27):1977-81
pubmed: 8247072
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):2084-93
pubmed: 23659733
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;38(4):417-23
pubmed: 25546244
Dig Endosc. 2014 Mar;26(2):243-9
pubmed: 23730922
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23
pubmed: 24125514