Incidence and effects of postoperative migration of interscalene catheter tips placed using ultrasound-guided anterior and posterior approaches.
Analgesia
Brachial plexus block
Catheters
Journal
Journal of anesthesia
ISSN: 1438-8359
Titre abrégé: J Anesth
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8905667
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
09
06
2020
accepted:
12
12
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
24
4
2021
entrez:
8
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) provides analgesia after shoulder surgery. However, even a catheter securely fixed at the insertion site may be susceptible to migration, precluding the block from working consistently. We examined to see if catheter tip migration would occur with no catheter-at-skin change after anterior and posterior approaches to CISB in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, and compared the incidence rate and pain scores between approaches and between catheters with and without tip migration, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive CISB using either anterior or posterior approach. Catheter tip was observed using a cross-sectional view. The rates of catheter tip migration with no catheter-at-skin change at 24 h after the two approaches were calculated and compared, and pain scores were compared between catheters with and without tip migration after each approach. Fifty-four patients were analyzed. Catheter tip migration occurred at 24 h at a similar rate after both approaches (anterior approach 40.7% versus posterior approach 33.3%, p = 0.78). Worst pain score was significantly higher for 24 h in patients whose catheter tip had migrated as compared with those whose catheter had not migrated after anterior (median [IQR] 53 [42-73] versus 18 [0-50], p = 0.003) and posterior approaches (median [IQR] 63 [57-81] versus 29 [3-47], p < 0.0001). In patients undergoing shoulder surgery, an interscalene catheter tip can migrate after both anterior and posterior approaches at a similar rate, even if the catheter insertion length is not changed. The tip migration does decrease the analgesic effect of CISB.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) provides analgesia after shoulder surgery. However, even a catheter securely fixed at the insertion site may be susceptible to migration, precluding the block from working consistently. We examined to see if catheter tip migration would occur with no catheter-at-skin change after anterior and posterior approaches to CISB in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, and compared the incidence rate and pain scores between approaches and between catheters with and without tip migration, respectively.
METHODS
Patients were randomly assigned to receive CISB using either anterior or posterior approach. Catheter tip was observed using a cross-sectional view. The rates of catheter tip migration with no catheter-at-skin change at 24 h after the two approaches were calculated and compared, and pain scores were compared between catheters with and without tip migration after each approach.
RESULTS
Fifty-four patients were analyzed. Catheter tip migration occurred at 24 h at a similar rate after both approaches (anterior approach 40.7% versus posterior approach 33.3%, p = 0.78). Worst pain score was significantly higher for 24 h in patients whose catheter tip had migrated as compared with those whose catheter had not migrated after anterior (median [IQR] 53 [42-73] versus 18 [0-50], p = 0.003) and posterior approaches (median [IQR] 63 [57-81] versus 29 [3-47], p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
In patients undergoing shoulder surgery, an interscalene catheter tip can migrate after both anterior and posterior approaches at a similar rate, even if the catheter insertion length is not changed. The tip migration does decrease the analgesic effect of CISB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33416994
doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02888-3
pii: 10.1007/s00540-020-02888-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics, Local
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
175-183Références
Borgeat A, Dullenkopf A, Ekatodramis G, Nagy L. Evaluation of the lateral modified approach for continuous interscalene block after shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:436–42.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00026
Ilfeld BM, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, Theriaque DW, Chmielewski TL, Spadoni EH, Wright TW. Ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blocks decrease the time to discharge readiness after total shoulder arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:999–1007.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00022
Kim JH, Koh HJ, Kim DK, Lee HJ, Kwon KH, Lee KY, Kim YS. Interscalene brachial plexus bolus block versus patient-controlled interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia for the first 48 h after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2018;27:1243–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.048
Vorobeichik L, Brull R, Bowry R, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Should continuous rather than single-injection interscalene block be routinely offered for major shoulder surgery? A meta-analysis of the analgesic and side-effects profiles. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120:679–92.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.104
Swenson JD, Davis JJ, Decou JA. A novel approach for assessing catheter position after ultrasound-guided placement of continuous interscalene block. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1015–6.
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161528a
Sabesan VJ, Shahriar R, Petersen-Fitts GR, Whaley JD, Bou-Akl T, Sweet M, Milia M. A prospective randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal postoperative pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous interscalene catheter. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26:1810–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.044
Shin HJ, Ahn JH, Jung HI, Lim CH, Shin HW, Lee HW, Lim HJ, Yoon SM, Chang SH. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided posterior approach for interscalene catheter placement during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;61:475–81.
doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.6.475
Schwenk ES, Gandhi K, Baratta JL, Torjman M, Epstein RH, Chung J, Vaghari BA, Beausang D, Bojaxhi E, Grady B. Ultrasound-guided out-of-plane vs. in-plane interscalene catheters: a randomized, prospective study. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2015;5:31111.
doi: 10.5812/aapm.31111
Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wright TW, Chidgey LK, Enneking FK. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1089–95.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000049824.51036.EF
Mariano ER, Afra R, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Bellars RH, Bishop ML, Cheng GS, Choy LP, Maldonado RC, Ilfeld BM. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1688–94.
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318199dc86
Klein SM, Nielsen KC, Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Kamal ASA, Rubin Y, Steele SM. 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue for the fixation of continuous peripheral nerve catheters. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:590–1.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00049
Gurnaney H, Kraemer FW, Ganesh A. Dermabond decreases pericatheter local anesthetic leakage after continuous perineural infusions. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:206.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821d38fb
Auyong DB, Cantor DA, Green C, Hanson NA. The effect of fixation technique on continuous interscalene nerve block catheter success: a randomized, double-blind trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:959–65.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001811
Fredrickson MJ, Leightley P, Wong A, Chaddock M, Abeysekera A, Frampton C. An analysis of 1505 consecutive patients receiving continuous interscalene analgesia at home: a multicentre prospective safety study. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:373–9.
doi: 10.1111/anae.13385
Antonakakis JG, Sites BD, Shiffrin J. Ultrasound-guided posterior approach for the placement of a continuous interscalene catheter. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:64–8.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b2bb9d
Spence BC, Beach ML, Gallagher JD, Sites BD. Ultrasound-guided interscalene blocks: understanding where to inject the local anaesthetic. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:509–14.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06712.x
Lang RS, Kentor ML, Vallejo M, Bigeleisen P, Wisniewski SR, Orebaugh SL. The impact of local anesthetic distribution on block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1146–51.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02745.x
Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2003. p. 64–85.
doi: 10.1002/0471445428
Ahsan ZS, Carvalho B, Yao J. Incidence of failure of continuous peripheral nerve catheters for postoperative analgesia in upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39:324–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.011
Marhofer D, Marhofer P, Triffterer L, Leonhardt M, Weber M, Zeitlinger M. Dislocation rates of perineural catheters: a volunteer study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:800–6.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aet198
Fredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Posterior versus anterolateral approach interscalene catheter placement: a prospective randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:125–33.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d5ee6
Finneran JJ, Swisher MW, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Abanobi MU, Abramson WB, Dalstrom DJ, Schwartz AK, Kent WT, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Ilfeld BM. Suture-method versus through-the-needle catheters for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:854–66.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003145
Webb CAJ, Kim TE, Funck N, Howard SK, Harrison TK, Ganaway T, Keng H, Mariano ER. Comparison of catheter tip migration using flexible and stimulating catheters inserted into the adductor canal in a cadaver model. J Anesth. 2015;29:471–4.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1957-9
Ilfeld BM, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Mariano ER, Bishop ML, Schwartz AK, Lee DK. Ultrasound-guided (needle-in-plane) perineural catheter insertion: the effect of catheter-insertion distance on postoperative analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:261–5.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820f3b80
Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: an update of the published evidence and comparison with novel, alternative analgesic modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:308–35.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581
Kan JM, Harrison TK, Kim TE, Howard SK, Kou A, Mariano ER. An in vitro study to evaluate the utility of the “air test” to infer perineural catheter tip location. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:529–33.
doi: 10.7863/jum.2013.32.3.529
Abdallah FW, Halpern SH, Aoyama K, Brull R. Will the real benefits of single-shot interscalene block please stand up? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;120:1114–29.