The effect of subcutaneous and intraperitoneal anesthesia on post laparoscopic pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Adult
Anesthesia, Local
/ methods
Anesthetics
/ administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local
/ administration & dosage
Bupivacaine
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Female
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Humans
Injections, Intraperitoneal
Injections, Subcutaneous
Laparoscopy
/ adverse effects
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
/ prevention & control
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 01 2021
08 01 2021
Historique:
received:
01
09
2020
accepted:
16
12
2020
entrez:
9
1
2021
pubmed:
10
1
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A few modes of perioperative local analgesia have been studied in order to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopy, including preemptive local anesthetics in the trocar sites and intraperitoneal anesthetics administration at the end of the surgery. However, the evidence regarding their efficacy are conflicting. In addition, the combination of both aforementioned methods has been rarely studied. Our aim was to evaluate whether subcutaneous trocar site and/or intraperitoneal analgesia reduce pain after gynecologic operative laparoscopy. This was a single-centered, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four equally sized groups: group 1-subcutaneous and intraperitoneal analgesia; group 2-subcutaneous analgesia and intraperitoneal placebo; group 3-subcutaneous placebo and intraperitoneal analgesia; Group 4-subcutaneous and intraperitoneal placebo. The patients, the surgeons, and the pain evaluators were all blinded to the patient's allocation. Included were patients who underwent elective operative laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: active infection, pregnancy, known sensitivity to Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride, chronic pelvic pain, surgeries with additional vaginal procedures, conversion to laparotomy, and malignancy. A total of 9 ml of Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride (Marcaine) 0.5%, or Sodium-Chloride 0.9%, as a placebo, were injected subcutaneously to the trocar sites (3 ml to each trocar site), prior to skin incision. In addition, 10 ml of Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride 0.5%, diluted with 40 ml of Sodium-Chloride 0.9% (a total of 50 ml solution), or 50 ml of Sodium-Chloride 0.9%, as a placebo, were injected intraperitoneally at the end of the surgery. By utilizing the 10 cm Visual-analogue-scale (VAS) we assessed post-operative pain at rest at 3, 8, and 24 h, and during ambulation at 8 and 24 h. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov. We conformed to the CONSORT recommendations. Between December 2016 and July 2019, a total of 119 patients were included in the study. Demographic and interventional characteristics were similar among the groups. The level of postoperative pain, either at rest or with change of position, was not significantly different between the groups, at all-time points. Application of subcutaneous and/or intraperitoneal analgesia is not effective in reducing pain after gynecologic operative laparoscopy.Clinical trial identification number: NCT02976571. Date of trial registration 11/29/2016. URL of the registration site: https://clinicaltrials.gov .
Identifiants
pubmed: 33420214
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80130-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-80130-6
pmc: PMC7794319
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics
0
Anesthetics, Local
0
Bupivacaine
Y8335394RO
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02976571']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
81Références
BJOG. 2014 May;121(6):754-60; discussion 761
pubmed: 24548730
J Int Med Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;33(4):372-8
pubmed: 16104440
Prog Brain Res. 2000;129:505-24
pubmed: 11098714
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):326-9
pubmed: 16036192
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 May;8(2):203-6
pubmed: 11342725
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):620-6
pubmed: 23706546
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):775-80
pubmed: 26997419
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):40-5
pubmed: 26241686
Clin J Pain. 2000 Mar;16(1):12-7
pubmed: 10741813
Anesth Analg. 2000 Apr;90(4):899-912
pubmed: 10735797
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):330-5
pubmed: 16036193
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;104(6):1335-9
pubmed: 15572499
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32
pubmed: 20335313
JSLS. 2004 Jan-Mar;8(1):15-8
pubmed: 14974656
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Feb;26(2):198-218
pubmed: 30064006
Fertil Steril. 1992 Mar;57(3):548-52
pubmed: 1531467
Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-73, table of contents
pubmed: 15728066
World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):259-84
pubmed: 23052794
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):545-53
pubmed: 22763313
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):557-567
pubmed: 28043841
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):210-5
pubmed: 15922977
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 30;1:CD011101
pubmed: 30699235