Impact of Membranes on In Vitro Release Assessment: a Case Study Using Dexamethasone.

dexamethasone diffusion filtration in vitro release membrane binding

Journal

AAPS PharmSciTech
ISSN: 1530-9932
Titre abrégé: AAPS PharmSciTech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100960111

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 02 08 2020
accepted: 05 11 2020
entrez: 11 1 2021
pubmed: 12 1 2021
medline: 27 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In vitro release studies are commonly used to assess the product performance of topical dosage forms. In such studies, the mass transport of drugs through synthetic membranes into a receiving chamber filled with a release medium is measured. The release medium is also passed through filtration membranes prior to chromatographic analysis. There are no official guidelines directing membrane selection for in vitro release studies or for filtration. Considering the diversity in membrane materials and their physical properties, the aim of this study was to investigate membrane-drug binding and the effect of various membranes on the release performance of a model drug dexamethasone (DEX) using USP dissolution apparatus IV. Seven membranes of different pore sizes (0.45 and 1.2 μm) and materials (cellulose acetate, polyethersulfone, and nylon) were assessed. Two different methods, syringe filter and 24-h incubation, were used for the determination of membrane-drug binding effects at low drug concentrations and saturated concentration conditions. Cellulose acetate and nylon membranes showed significant drug binding after 24-h incubations at both drug concentrations. DEX diffusion through membranes was significantly slowed down in all the tested membranes when compared with DEX solution without membranes. The extent of the retardation varied due to the differences in membrane structures. In conclusion, materials and sources of membranes affected drug dissolution profiles and the results showed membrane-drug binding effects. Proper selection of membranes with low drug binding ability and low diffusion resistance is essential to ensure appropriate and reproducible in vitro release assessments and filtration studies. Graphical Abstract.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33426616
doi: 10.1208/s12249-020-01874-y
pii: 10.1208/s12249-020-01874-y
doi:

Substances chimiques

Membranes, Artificial 0
Dexamethasone 7S5I7G3JQL

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

42

Références

Ueda C, Shah V, Derdzinski K, Ewing G, Flynn G, Maibach H, et al. Topical and transdermal drug products. Pharmacopeial Forum: The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.; 2009.
Bao Q, Shen J, Jog R, Zhang C, Newman B, Wang Y, et al. In vitro release testing method development for ophthalmic ointments. Int J Pharm. 2017;526:145–56.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.075
Corbo M. Techniques for conducting in vitro release studies on semisolid formulations. Dissolution Technol. 1995;2:3–6.
doi: 10.14227/DT020195P3
Patere S, Newman B, Wang Y, Choi S, Mekjaruskul C, Jay M, et al. Influence of in vitro release methods on assessment of tobramycin ophthalmic ointments. Int J Pharm. 2020;590:119938.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119938
Petró E, Paál TL, Eros I, Kenneth AS, Baki G, Csóka I. Drug release from semisolid dosage forms: a comparison of two testing methods. Pharm Dev Technol. 2015;20:330–6.
doi: 10.3109/10837450.2013.867446
Azarmi S, Roa W, Löbenberg R. Current perspectives in dissolution testing of conventional and novel dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 2007;328:12–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.10.001
Thakker KD, Chern WH. Development and validation of in vitro release tests for semisolid dosage forms—case study. Dissolution Technol. 2003:10–5.
Mafune E, Takahashi M, Takasugi N. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of water-absorption properties of various ointments. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24:51–6.
doi: 10.3109/03639049809082352
Kanfer I, Rath S, Purazi P, Mudyahoto NA. In vitro release testing of semi-solid dosage forms. Dissolution Technol. 2017;24:52–60.
doi: 10.14227/DT240317P52
Olejnik A, Goscianska J, Nowak I. Active compounds release from semisolid dosage forms. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:4032–45.
doi: 10.1002/jps.23289
Ng SF, Rouse J, Sanderson D, Eccleston G. A comparative study of transmembrane diffusion and permeation of ibuprofen across synthetic membranes using franz diffusion cells. Pharmaceutics. 2010;2:209–23.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics2020209
Wu ST, Shiu GK, Simmons JE, Bronaugh RL, Skelly JP. In vitro release of nitroglycerin from topical products by use of artificial membranes. J Pharm Sci. 1992;81:1153–6.
doi: 10.1002/jps.2600811204
Gallagher SJ, Trottet L, Carter TP, Heard CM. Effects of membrane type and liquid/liquid phase boundary on in vitro release of ketoprofen form gel formulations. J Drug Target. 2003;11:373–9.
doi: 10.1080/10611860310001636890
Nallagundla S, Patnala S, Kanfer I. Comparison of in vitro release rates of acyclovir from cream formulations using vertical diffusion cells. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15:994–9.
doi: 10.1208/s12249-014-0130-y
Bao Q, Jog R, Shen J, Newman B, Wang Y, Choi S, et al. Physicochemical attributes and dissolution testing of ophthalmic ointments. Int J Pharm. 2017;523:310–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.039
Dong Y, Qu H, Pavurala N, Wang J, Sekar V, Martinez MN, et al. Formulation characteristics and in vitro release testing of cyclosporine ophthalmic ointments. Int J Pharm. 2018;544:254–64.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.04.042
Ng SF, Rouse JJ, Sanderson FD, Eccleston GM. The relevance of polymeric synthetic membranes in topical formulation assessment and drug diffusion study. Arch Pharm Res. 2012;35:579–93.
doi: 10.1007/s12272-012-0401-7
Marques MRC, Loebenberg R, Almukainzi M. Simulated biological fluids with possible application in dissolution testing. Dissolution Technol. 2011;18:15–28.
doi: 10.14227/DT180311P15
Mohan Gandhi B, Lakshmana Rao A, Venkateswara RJ. Validated spectrophotometric and stability indicating RP-HPLC methods for the simultaneous estimation of gatifloxacin and dexamethasone in ophthalmic dosage form. Int J Chem Sci. 2016;14:617–34.
Sterlitech-Corporation. Advantages of asymmetric membranes [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.sterlitech.com/blog/post/advantages-of-asymmetric-membranes
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. FDA-SUPAC-SS. Guidance for industry. Non-sterile semisolid dosage forms scale-up and postapproval change: chemistry, manufacturing and controls. In vitro release testing and in vivo bioequivalence documentation U.S. 1997.
Kanke M, Eubanks JL, DeLuca PP. Binding of selected drugs to a “treated” inline filter. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983;40:1323–8.
pubmed: 6225336

Auteurs

Catheleeya Mekjaruskul (C)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

André O'Reilly Beringhs (AO)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

Wei-Chung Luo (WC)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

Qingguo Xu (Q)

Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Matthew Halquist (M)

Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Bin Qin (B)

Division of Therapeutic Performance, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Yan Wang (Y)

Division of Therapeutic Performance, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Xiuling Lu (X)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. xiuling.lu@uconn.edu.

Articles similaires

Vancomycin Polyesters Anti-Bacterial Agents Models, Theoretical Drug Liberation
Organoids Animals Kidney Mice Humans
Hemolysin Proteins Artificial Cells Protein Engineering Protein Transport Cell Membrane
Humans Polytetrafluoroethylene Titanium Retrospective Studies Male

Classifications MeSH