Comparative genomics of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) reveals a similar distribution of the 10 most prevalent ESBL-Ec clones and ESBL genes among human community faecal and extra-intestinal infection isolates in the Netherlands (2014-17).
Journal
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN: 1460-2091
Titre abrégé: J Antimicrob Chemother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 03 2021
12 03 2021
Historique:
received:
03
09
2020
accepted:
19
11
2020
pubmed:
12
1
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
11
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The human gut microbiota is an important reservoir of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec). Community surveillance studies of ESBL-Ec to monitor circulating clones and ESBL genes are logistically challenging and costly. To evaluate if isolates obtained in routine clinical practice can be used as an alternative to monitor the distribution of clones and ESBL genes circulating in the community. WGS was performed on 451 Dutch ESBL-Ec isolates (2014-17), including 162 community faeces and 289 urine and blood isolates. We compared proportions of 10 most frequently identified STs, PopPUNK-based sequence clusters (SCs) and ESBL gene subtypes and the degree of similarity using Czekanowski's proportional similarity index (PSI). Nine out of 10 most prevalent STs and SCs and 8/10 most prevalent ESBL genes in clinical ESBL-Ec were also the most common types in community faeces. The proportions of ST131 (39% versus 23%) and SC131 (40% versus 25%) were higher in clinical isolates than in community faeces (P < 0.01). Within ST131, H30Rx (C2) subclade was more prevalent among clinical isolates (55% versus 26%, P < 0.01). The proportion of ESBL gene blaCTX-M-1 was lower in clinical isolates (5% versus 18%, P < 0.01). Czekanowski's PSI confirmed that the differences in ESBL-Ec from community faeces and clinical isolates were limited. Distributions of the 10 most prevalent clones and ESBL genes from ESBL-Ec community gut colonization and extra-intestinal infection overlapped in majority, indicating that isolates from routine clinical practice could be used to monitor ESBL-Ec clones and ESBL genes in the community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33428729
pii: 6082778
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa534
pmc: PMC7953314
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
beta-Lactamases
EC 3.5.2.6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
901-908Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;18(10):1138-1149
pubmed: 30126643
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Feb;72(2):582-588
pubmed: 27798205
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3576-8
pubmed: 21502612
mBio. 2013 Dec 17;4(6):e00377-13
pubmed: 24345742
Oecologia. 1981 Sep;50(3):296-302
pubmed: 28309044
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):4997-5004
pubmed: 24867985
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Jun;19(6):542-9
pubmed: 22757622
PLoS One. 2014 May 01;9(5):e96308
pubmed: 24788143
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;17(7):1216-22
pubmed: 21762575
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5
pubmed: 23422339
J Comput Biol. 2013 Oct;20(10):714-37
pubmed: 24093227
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):430
pubmed: 28619013
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Aug;3(8):e357-e369
pubmed: 31439317
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Jun 12;32(3):
pubmed: 31189557
J Infect Dis. 2013 Mar 15;207(6):919-28
pubmed: 23288927
Genome Res. 2019 Feb;29(2):304-316
pubmed: 30679308
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;19(12):1325-1335
pubmed: 31653524
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Feb;59(2):165-74
pubmed: 17158117
Stat Med. 2019 May 30;38(12):2292-2302
pubmed: 30672002
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 1;68(4):641-649
pubmed: 29961883
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0226238
pubmed: 31978059
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Feb;23(2):120.e1-120.e8
pubmed: 27773759
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Aug 1;51(3):286-94
pubmed: 20572763
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 01;10(6):e0129085
pubmed: 26029910
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Nov;67(11):2640-4
pubmed: 22782487
Euro Surveill. 2008 Nov 20;13(47):
pubmed: 19021958
Euro Surveill. 2019 Oct;24(41):
pubmed: 31615600
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Nov;62(5):1142-9
pubmed: 18641033
Stat Med. 2000 May 30;19(10):1319-28
pubmed: 10814980
mBio. 2016 Apr 26;7(2):e00347-16
pubmed: 27118589
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Feb 1;73(2):339-347
pubmed: 29165596
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jun;17(6):873-80
pubmed: 21463397
mBio. 2016 Mar 22;7(2):e02162
pubmed: 27006459
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 13;11(1):228
pubmed: 31932601
mBio. 2019 Apr 23;10(2):
pubmed: 31015329
Int J Med Microbiol. 2017 Dec;307(8):497-507
pubmed: 29031453
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;56(4):478-87
pubmed: 23243181
Genome Res. 2017 Jul 18;:
pubmed: 28720578
Microb Genom. 2016 Nov 30;2(11):e000093
pubmed: 28348833
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1355-61
pubmed: 22238442
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;22(11):1900-1907
pubmed: 27767006