Effect of recombinant LH supplementation on cumulative live birth rate compared with FSH alone in poor ovarian responders: a large, real-world study.


Journal

Reproductive biomedicine online
ISSN: 1472-6491
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biomed Online
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101122473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 11 05 2020
revised: 20 08 2020
accepted: 25 08 2020
pubmed: 13 1 2021
medline: 30 11 2021
entrez: 12 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The benefit of LH supplementation (LHS) over sole use of FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) remains controversial. Meta-analyses have provided some evidence that the benefit of LHS is limited to women with poor ovarian response (POR). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LHS on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in POR using a large controlled study in a real-world context. This retrospective multicentre controlled study used data from registries at 12 French ART centres. All instances of POR undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with follitrophin-alfa (FSH-α) with or without lutrophin-α were selected following an intention-to-treat principle. POR was defined according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria, and classified into three categories (Mild, Moderate and Severe) according to the Poor Responder Outcome Prediction (PROsPeR) score. The primary end-point was the CLBR associated with fresh and frozen embryos originating from the same ovarian stimulation. A total of 9787 instances of ovarian stimulation (5218 LHS, 4569 FSH-α only) were analysed, 33.0%, 52.4% and 14.6% being allocated to the Mild, Moderate and Severe PROsPeR categories, respectively. Using a mixed logistic model and adjusting for matched subclasses and baseline POR severity, it was found that the benefit of LHS compared with use of FSH alone differed between baseline severity categories (interaction test, P = 0.007): a significant benefit of LHS for CLBR was found for patients in the Moderate (14.3% versus 11.3%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.75, risk ratio [RR] = 1.29, P = 0.013) and Severe (9.8% versus 4.4%, OR = 2.40, 95% CI- 1.48-3.89, RR = 1.89, P < 0.001) categories, but not for the Mild category (18.8% versus 19.6%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.15, RR = 0.95, P = 0.60). LHS has a significant effect on increasing CLBR in moderately and severely poor ovarian responders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33431337
pii: S1472-6483(20)30468-5
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.035
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Recombinant Proteins 0
Luteinizing Hormone 9002-67-9
Follicle Stimulating Hormone 9002-68-0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

546-554

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Philippe Arvis (P)

Clinique La Sagesse, Rennes, France. Electronic address: philippe.arvis@wanadoo.fr.

Nathalie Massin (N)

Centre Hospitalier Inter-communal, Créteil, France.

Philippe Lehert (P)

Faculty of Economics, UCL Mons, Louvain, Belgium, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH