Retrospective Analysis of the Safety and Outcomes of Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy in Obese vs Nonobese Patients.
GI access
adult
enteral access
Journal
JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
ISSN: 1941-2444
Titre abrégé: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7804134
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
06
01
2021
accepted:
07
01
2021
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
1
4
2022
entrez:
12
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and outcomes of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) in obese vs nonobese patients. This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of 109 patients (male:female, 68:41; mean age, 64.7 years; range, 21-94 years) who underwent PRG with or without gastropexy at a single academic medical center between 2015 and 2018. Body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m Of 109 patients included in the study, 22.9% (n = 25) of patients were obese (average BMI, 34.6 kg/m PRG is a safe procedure in obese patients with similar technical success, major and minor complication rates, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. However, PRG is associated with increased radiation dose with obese patients; therefore, optimal methods of radiation protection should be utilized.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and outcomes of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) in obese vs nonobese patients.
METHODS
This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of 109 patients (male:female, 68:41; mean age, 64.7 years; range, 21-94 years) who underwent PRG with or without gastropexy at a single academic medical center between 2015 and 2018. Body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m
RESULTS
Of 109 patients included in the study, 22.9% (n = 25) of patients were obese (average BMI, 34.6 kg/m
CONCLUSION
PRG is a safe procedure in obese patients with similar technical success, major and minor complication rates, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. However, PRG is associated with increased radiation dose with obese patients; therefore, optimal methods of radiation protection should be utilized.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1714-1719Informations de copyright
© 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.
Références
Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? Estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(10):2323-2330.
Aberle D, Charles H, Hodak S, O'Neill D, Oklu R, Deipolyi AR. Optimizing care for the obese patient in interventional radiology. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23(2):156-162.
Bochicchio GV, Guzzo JL, Scalea TM. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the super-morbidly obese patient. JSLS. 2006;10(4):409-413.
Itkin M, DeLegge MH, Fang JC, et al. Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression from the society of interventional radiology and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, with endorsement by Canadian Interventional Radiological Association (CIRA) and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(8):1089-1106.
McGarr SE, Kirby DF. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in the overweight and obese patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(3):212-216.
Wiggins TF, Garrow DA, DeLegge MH. Evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic feeding tube placement in obese patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24(6):723-727.
Crowley JJ, Hogan MJ, Towbin RB, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for pediatric gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tube placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(12):1983-1991.
Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S199-202.
Galaski A, Peng WW, Ellis M, Darling P, Common A, Tucker E. Gastrostomy tube placement by radiological versus endoscopic methods in an acute care setting: a retrospective review of frequency, indications, complications and outcomes. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(2):109-114.
Loser C, Wolters S, Folsch UR. Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43(11):2549-2557.
Moller P, Lindberg CG, Zilling T. Gastrostomy by various techniques: evaluation of indications, outcome, and complications. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(10):1050-1054.
Rimon E, Kagansky N, Levy S. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; evidence of different prognosis in various patient subgroups. Age Ageing. 2005;34(4):353-357.
Hsi RS, Zamora DA, Kanal KM, Harper JD. Severe obesity is associated with 3-fold higher radiation dose rate during ureteroscopy. Urology. 2013;82(4):780-785.
Wagner LK, Archer BR, Cohen AM. Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(1):25-33.