Efficacy of denture adhesives in complete denture wearers compared to denture wearers not using denture adhesives. A systematic review.
complete dentures
denture adhesives
edentulous
systematic review
Journal
Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
ISSN: 1754-4505
Titre abrégé: Spec Care Dentist
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8103755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
30
09
2020
revised:
02
12
2020
accepted:
25
12
2020
pubmed:
14
1
2021
medline:
13
3
2021
entrez:
13
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of denture adhesives (DAs) in completely edentulous denture wearers compared to not using DAs. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from the database inception up to 6 February 2020 for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving patients with complete dentures in both arches where the use of DAs was compared to no use of DAs. A total of 497 abstracts were reviewed, resulting in inclusion of 10 RCTs. Outcomes reported in the included trials were thoroughly reviewed and tabulated. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used. All 10 studies were assessed at unclear (10%) or high risk of bias (90%). Studies showed DAs improved mainly retention/stability, and masticatory/chewing ability/performance, compared to no adhesives. Most studies showed favorable results for DAs on retention and stability of complete dentures, masticatory performance, patient's comfort and satisfaction. Due to the heterogeneity of the outcomes, unclear/high risk of bias and small sample sizes, the quality of the evidence was very low. More high-quality research is needed with improved blinding and use of standardized methods to evaluate the efficacy of DAs.
Substances chimiques
Dental Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
251-270Informations de copyright
© 2021 Special Care Dentistry Association and Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Alves AC, Cavalcanti RV, Calderon PS, Pernambuco L, Alchieri JC. Quality of life related to complete denture. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2018;31(2):91-96.
Lemos MMC, Zanin L, Jorge MLR, Flório FM. Oral health conditions and self-perception among edentulous individuals with different prosthetic status. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2013;12(1):5-10.
Felton DA. Edentulism and comorbid factors. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(2):88-96.
Emami E, Freitas de Souza R, Kabawat M, Feine J. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent. 2013:7. 2013(Article ID 498305).
Goiato MC, Bannwart LC, Moreno A, Dos Santos DM, Martini AP, Pereira L V. Quality of life and stimulus perception in patients’ rehabilitated with complete denture. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(6):438-445.
Skoskiewicz-Malinowska K, Malicka B, Zie M, Kaczmarek U. Oral health condition and occurence of depression in the elderly. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(41): e12490.
Cademartori MG, Gastal MT, Nascimento GG, Demarco FF, Corrêa MB. Is depression associated with oral health outcomes in adults and elders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(8):2685-2702.
Veyrune JL, Tubert-Jeannin S, Dutheil C, Riordan PJ. Impact of new prostheses on the oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2005;22(1):3-9.
Nicolas E, Veyrune JL, Lassauzay C. A six-month assessment of oral health-related quality of life of complete denture wearers using denture adhesive: a pilot study. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(6):443-448.
Adisman IK. The use of denture adhesives as an aid to denture treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(6):711-715.
Munoz CA, Gendreau L, Shanga G, Magnuszewski T, Fernandez P, Durocher J. A clinical study to evaluate denture adhesive use in well-fitting dentures. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(2):123-129.
Michaud PL, De Grandmont P, Feine JS, Emami E. Measuring patient-based outcomes: is treatment satisfaction associated with oral health-related quality of life? J Dent. 2012;40(8):624-631.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.1.0. 2020. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current. Accessed 21 September 2020.
De Oliveira Junior NM, Rodriguez LS, Mendoza Marin DO, et al. Masticatory performance of complete denture wearers after using two adhesives: a crossover randomized clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(5):1182-1187.
Berg E. A clinical comparison of four denture adhesives. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4(5):449-456.
Goncalves TMSV, Viu FC, Goncalves LM, et al. Denture adhesives improve mastication in denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(2):140-146.
Kapur KK. A clinical evaluation of denture adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;18(6):550-558.
Marin DOM, Leite ARP, Paleari AG, et al. Effect of a denture adhesive on the satisfaction and Kinesiographic Parameters of complete denture wearers: a cross-over randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(5):391-398.
Myatt GJ, Hunt SA, Barlow AP, Winston JL, Bordas A, El Maaytah M. A clinical study to assess the breath protection efficacy of denture adhesive. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2002;3(4):1-9.
Pradies G, Sanz I, Evans O, et al. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22(4):361-367.
Torres-Sanchez C, Montoya-Salazar V, Torres-Lagares D, et al. Comparison of masticatory efficacy among complete denture wearers with two adhesives and dentate individuals: a randomized, crossover, double-blind clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):614-620.
Ohwada G, Minakuchi S, Sato Y, et al. Subjective evaluation of denture adhesives: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JDR Clin Transl Res. 2020;5(1):50-61.
Barbenel JC. Physical retention of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26(6):592-600.
Shehanaz A, Gunasingh A, Dhanraj. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures. Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci. 2017;8(2):205-211.
Coates AJ. Denture adhesives: a review. Aust Prosthodont J. 1995;9:27-31.
Duqum I, Powers KA, Cooper L, Felton D. Denture adhesive use in complete dentures: clinical recommendations and review of the literature. Gen Dent. 2012;60(6):467-469.
Kumar VHC, Surapaneni H, Ravikiran V, Chandra BS, Balusu S, Reddy VN. Retention of denture bases fabricated by three different processing techniques: an in vivo study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(3):245-250.
Massad JJ, Cagna DR. A review of complete denture therapy for patients with compromised retention. Dent Today. 2003;22(11):100-107.
Papadiochou S, Emmanouil I, Papadiochos I. Denture adhesives: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(5):391-397.
Grasso JE. Denture adhesives: changing attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127(1):90-96.
Singh M, Singh R, Tripathi A, Raj N. Evaluation of masticatory performance in subjects with shortened dental arch: a comparative study. Eur J Gen Dent. 2014;3(2):146.
Katsuhiko K, Takahiro O, Garrett NR, Minoru T. Assessment of masticatory performance: methodologies and their application. Prosthodont Res Pr. 2004;3(1):33-45.