Revision Surgery Rates After Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Correlation with Roussouly Spine Type at 2-Year Follow-Up?


Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 21 09 2020
revised: 02 01 2021
accepted: 04 01 2021
pubmed: 15 1 2021
medline: 23 7 2021
entrez: 14 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Spinopelvic parameters have hitherto dictated much of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction. The Roussouly classification is used for the normal adult spine. We evaluated whether a correlation would be found between the Roussouly type and the rate of revision surgery in patients with ASD undergoing circumferential minimally invasive spinal (cMIS) correction. A multicenter retrospective review of patients who had undergone cMIS surgery for ASD was performed. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and 1 of the following: coronal Cobb angle >20°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20°, pelvic incidence (PI) to lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch >10°, cMIS surgery, and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up data available. The patients were classified by Roussouly type, and the clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. A total of 104 patients were included in the present analysis. Of the 104 patients, 41 had Roussouly type 1, 32 had type 2, 23 had type 3, and 8 had type 4. Preoperatively, the patients with type 4 had the highest PI (P = 0.002) and LL (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the PI-LL mismatch, Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis were not different among the 4 groups. However, the patients with type 2 had had the highest rate of complications (type 1, 29.3%; type 2, 61.3%; type 3, 34.8%; type 4, 25.0%; P = 0.031). The reoperation rates were comparable (type 1, 19.5%; type 2, 38.7%; type 3, 13.0%; type 4, 12.5%; P = 0.097). The reoperation rates for adjacent segment degeneration or proximal junctional kyphosis were also comparable (P = 0.204 and P = 0.060, respectively). We did not find a clear correlation between Roussouly type and the rate of revision surgery for adjacent segment disease or proximal junctional kyphosis in patients who had undergone cMIS surgery for ASD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Spinopelvic parameters have hitherto dictated much of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction. The Roussouly classification is used for the normal adult spine. We evaluated whether a correlation would be found between the Roussouly type and the rate of revision surgery in patients with ASD undergoing circumferential minimally invasive spinal (cMIS) correction.
METHODS
A multicenter retrospective review of patients who had undergone cMIS surgery for ASD was performed. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and 1 of the following: coronal Cobb angle >20°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20°, pelvic incidence (PI) to lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch >10°, cMIS surgery, and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up data available. The patients were classified by Roussouly type, and the clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 104 patients were included in the present analysis. Of the 104 patients, 41 had Roussouly type 1, 32 had type 2, 23 had type 3, and 8 had type 4. Preoperatively, the patients with type 4 had the highest PI (P = 0.002) and LL (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the PI-LL mismatch, Cobb angle, and sagittal vertical axis were not different among the 4 groups. However, the patients with type 2 had had the highest rate of complications (type 1, 29.3%; type 2, 61.3%; type 3, 34.8%; type 4, 25.0%; P = 0.031). The reoperation rates were comparable (type 1, 19.5%; type 2, 38.7%; type 3, 13.0%; type 4, 12.5%; P = 0.097). The reoperation rates for adjacent segment degeneration or proximal junctional kyphosis were also comparable (P = 0.204 and P = 0.060, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
We did not find a clear correlation between Roussouly type and the rate of revision surgery for adjacent segment disease or proximal junctional kyphosis in patients who had undergone cMIS surgery for ASD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33444841
pii: S1878-8750(21)00032-2
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e482-e487

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Dean Chou (D)

Department of Neurosurgery University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: dean.chou@ucsf.edu.

Alvin Y Chan (AY)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

Paul Park (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Robert K Eastlack (RK)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, California, USA.

Kai-Ming Fu (KM)

Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Robert G Fessler (RG)

Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Khoi D Than (KD)

Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Neel Anand (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Juan Uribe (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

David O Okonkwo (DO)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Adam S Kanter (AS)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Pierce Nunley (P)

Department of Orthopedics, Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.

Michael Y Wang (MY)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.

Gregory M Mundis (GM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, California, USA.

Praveen V Mummaneni (PV)

Department of Neurosurgery University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH