Assessing the relationship between monoallelic PRKN mutations and Parkinson's risk.
Journal
Human molecular genetics
ISSN: 1460-2083
Titre abrégé: Hum Mol Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208958
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 03 2021
25 03 2021
Historique:
received:
15
07
2020
revised:
10
12
2020
accepted:
11
01
2021
pubmed:
16
1
2021
medline:
5
10
2021
entrez:
15
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Biallelic Parkin (PRKN) mutations cause autosomal recessive Parkinson's disease (PD); however, the role of monoallelic PRKN mutations as a risk factor for PD remains unclear. We investigated the role of single heterozygous PRKN mutations in three large independent case-control cohorts totalling 10 858 PD cases and 8328 controls. Overall, after exclusion of biallelic carriers, single PRKN mutations were more common in PD than controls conferring a >1.5-fold increase in the risk of PD [P-value (P) = 0.035], with meta-analysis (19 574 PD cases and 468 488 controls) confirming increased risk [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.65, P = 3.69E-07]. Carriers were shown to have significantly younger ages at the onset compared with non-carriers (NeuroX: 56.4 vs. 61.4 years; exome: 38.5 vs. 43.1 years). Stratifying by mutation type, we provide preliminary evidence for a more pathogenic risk profile for single PRKN copy number variant (CNV) carriers compared with single nucleotide variant carriers. Studies that did not assess biallelic PRKN mutations or consist of predominantly early-onset cases may be biasing these estimates, and removal of these resulted in a loss of association (OR = 1.23, P = 0.614; n = 4). Importantly, when we looked for additional CNVs in 30% of PD cases with apparent monoallellic PRKN mutations, we found that 44% had biallelic mutations, suggesting that previous estimates may be influenced by cryptic biallelic mutation status. While this study supports the association of single PRKN mutations with PD, it highlights confounding effects; therefore, caution is needed when interpreting current risk estimates. Together, we demonstrate that comprehensive assessment of biallelic mutation status is essential when elucidating PD risk associated with monoallelic PRKN mutations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33448283
pii: 6097030
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddaa273
pmc: PMC8033143
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
EC 2.3.2.27
parkin protein
EC 2.3.2.27
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78-86Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T033371/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L010305/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0801418
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Parkinson's UK
ID : H-1703
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P005748/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Parkinson's UK
ID : K-1501
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L023784/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1100643
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0700943
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T04604X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
Hum Mol Genet. 2015 Oct 1;24(19):5637-43
pubmed: 26188007
Hum Mol Genet. 2016 Dec 15;25(24):5483-5489
pubmed: 27798102
Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;13(9):1086-93
pubmed: 15970950
Genome Res. 2007 Nov;17(11):1665-74
pubmed: 17921354
Neurology. 2010 Sep 28;75(13):1189-94
pubmed: 20876472
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 20;27(24):3975-80
pubmed: 19620482
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Jul;6(7):652-62
pubmed: 17582365
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Jan;37:210.e1-210.e5
pubmed: 26518746
Ann Neurol. 2002 May;51(5):621-5
pubmed: 12112109
Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Jul;91:168.e1-168.e5
pubmed: 32249012
Dis Markers. 2013;35(3):181-5
pubmed: 24167364
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 21;117(3):1621-1627
pubmed: 31882447
Arch Neurol. 2006 Jun;63(6):826-32
pubmed: 16769863
BMC Neurol. 2008 Jan 22;8:1
pubmed: 18211709
Arch Neurol. 2006 Apr;63(4):548-52
pubmed: 16606767
Hum Mutat. 2008 Feb;29(2):315-22
pubmed: 17994548
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Dec;18(12):1091-1102
pubmed: 31701892
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;148:147-53
pubmed: 27455133
Am J Med Genet. 2002 Jul 8;114(5):584-91
pubmed: 12116199
Mov Disord. 2017 Jan;32(1):165-169
pubmed: 28124432
J Med Genet. 2009 Jun;46(6):375-81
pubmed: 19351622
Neurology. 2009 Jul 28;73(4):279-86
pubmed: 19636047
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Sep 1;28(17):2811-2825
pubmed: 30994895
Acta Neurol Scand. 2006 Jan;113(1):9-13
pubmed: 16367892
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e20988
pubmed: 21829596
Ann Neurol. 2007 Jan;61(1):47-54
pubmed: 17187375
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Mar;36(3):1605.e7-12
pubmed: 25444595
J Neurol. 2014 Feb;261(2):259-66
pubmed: 23798000
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14(4):326-33
pubmed: 18519021
J Med Genet. 2008 Jan;45(1):43-6
pubmed: 17766365
Mov Disord. 2003 Nov;18(11):1306-11
pubmed: 14639672
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Jul;15(6):425-9
pubmed: 19162522
Mov Disord. 2004 Jun;19(6):677-81
pubmed: 15197707
Eur J Neurol. 2006 Apr;13(4):385-90
pubmed: 16643317
Mol Neurodegener. 2016 Apr 19;11:29
pubmed: 27094865
Mov Disord. 2009 Jan 30;24(2):196-203
pubmed: 18973254
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Apr;64:159.e5-159.e8
pubmed: 29398121
Neurology. 2002 Apr 23;58(8):1239-46
pubmed: 11971093