The Dutch-Belgian Registry of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases: Clinical Outcomes of 515 Patients and 668 Metastases.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2021
Historique:
received: 29 09 2020
revised: 29 09 2020
accepted: 15 11 2020
pubmed: 17 1 2021
medline: 30 7 2021
entrez: 16 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although various studies have reported that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases has high local control rates and relatively low toxicity, most series included a small number of patients. We aimed to validate these outcomes in a large multi-institution patient cohort treated in accordance with a common protocol. A shared web-based registry of patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT was developed by 13 centers (12 in the Netherlands and 1 in Belgium). All the centers had previously agreed on the items to be collected, the fractionation schemes, and the organs-at-risk constraints to be applied. Follow-up was performed at the discretion of the centers. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were entered in the registry. Only liver metastases treated individually as independent targets and with at least 1 radiologic follow-up examination were considered for local control analysis. Toxicity of grade 3 or greater was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (v4.03). Between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2019, a total of 515 patients were entered in the web-based registry. The median age was 71 years. In total, 668 liver metastases were registered, and 447 were included for local control analysis. The most common primary tumor origin was colorectal cancer (80.3%), followed by lung cancer (8.9%) and breast cancer (4%). The most-used fractionation scheme was 3x18-20 Gy (36.0%), followed by 8x7.5 Gy (31.8%), 5x11-12 Gy (25.5%), and 12x5 Gy (6.7%). The median follow-up time was 1.1 years for local control and 2.3 years for survival. Actuarial 1-year local control was 87%; 1-year overall survival was 84%. Toxicity of grade 3 or greater was found in 3.9% of the patients. This multi-institutional study confirms the high rates of local control and limited toxicity in a large patient cohort. Stereotactic body radiation therapy should be considered a valuable part of the multidisciplinary approach to treating liver metastases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33451857
pii: S0360-3016(20)34567-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.045
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1377-1386

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alejandra Méndez Romero (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: a.mendezromero@erasmusmc.nl.

Wilco Schillemans (W)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Rob van Os (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Friederike Koppe (F)

Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Cornelis J Haasbeek (CJ)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Ellen M Hendriksen (EM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Karin Muller (K)

Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, Netherlands.

Heleen M Ceha (HM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center Antoniushove, Leidschendam, Netherlands.

Pètra M Braam (PM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Onne Reerink (O)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Kliniek, Zwolle, Netherlands.

Martijn P M Intven (MPM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Ines Joye (I)

Iridium Cancer Network, Antwerp, Belgium.

Edwin P M Jansen (EPM)

Division of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Henrike Westerveld (H)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Merel S Koedijk (MS)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Ben J M Heijmen (BJM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Jeroen Buijsen (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH