Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.
breast cancer risk
breast imaging
compressed breast
dosimetry
fibroglandular tissue
Journal
Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
revised:
30
10
2020
received:
17
06
2020
accepted:
07
01
2021
pubmed:
17
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
16
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop a patient-based breast density model by characterizing the fibroglandular tissue distribution in patient breasts during compression for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging. In this prospective study, 88 breast images were acquired using a dedicated breast computed tomography (CT) system. The breasts in the images were classified into their three main tissue components and mechanically compressed to mimic the positioning for mammographic acquisition of the craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views. The resulting fibroglandular tissue distribution during these compressions was characterized by dividing the compressed breast volume into small regions, for which the median and the 25th and 75th percentile values of local fibroglandular density were obtained in the axial, coronal, and sagittal directions. The best fitting function, based on the likelihood method, for the median distribution was obtained in each direction. The fibroglandular tissue tends to concentrate toward the caudal (about 15% below the midline of the breast) and anterior regions of the breast, in both the CC- and MLO-view compressions. A symmetrical distribution was found in the MLO direction in the case of the CC-view compression, while a shift of about 12% toward the lateral direction was found in the MLO-view case. The location of the fibroglandular tissue in the breast under compression during mammography and DBT image acquisition is a major factor for determining the actual glandular dose imparted during these examinations. A more realistic model of the parenchyma in the compressed breast, based on patient image data, was developed. This improved model more accurately reflects the fibroglandular tissue spatial distribution that can be found in patient breasts, and therefore might aid in future studies involving radiation dose and/or cancer development risk estimation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33452822
doi: 10.1002/mp.14716
pmc: PMC7986202
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1436-1447Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA181081
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA181171
Pays : United States
Organisme : Susan G. Komen Foundation for the Cure
ID : IIR13262248
Organisme : HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ID : R01CA181171
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2180-91
pubmed: 21626952
Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4040-4044
pubmed: 28569996
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6337-48
pubmed: 26520725
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):5050-9
pubmed: 22894430
Med Phys. 2013 Jan;40(1):014301
pubmed: 23298126
J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Jul;7(3):207-14
pubmed: 26906525
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 18;356(3):227-36
pubmed: 17229950
Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):98-105
pubmed: 21081671
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 19;64(1):015003
pubmed: 30524034
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Aug;93:121-127
pubmed: 28668405
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3):209
pubmed: 18598375
Radiology. 2019 May;291(2):320-327
pubmed: 30888933
Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1199-206
pubmed: 18491511
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):359-63
pubmed: 15933137
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1159-69
pubmed: 16775176
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Oct 7;61(19):R271-R304
pubmed: 27617767
Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4110-20
pubmed: 20879571
Med Phys. 2015 Dec;42(12):7059-77
pubmed: 26632060
Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5437-43
pubmed: 20095256
Med Phys. 2018 Jun;45(6):2542-2559
pubmed: 29676025