Early postoperative outcomes in implant, pedicled, and free flap reconstruction for breast cancer: an analysis of 23,834 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets.


Journal

Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 07 10 2020
accepted: 23 12 2020
pubmed: 20 1 2021
medline: 24 6 2021
entrez: 19 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many patients seek breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Debate exists regarding the best reconstructive option. The authors evaluate outcomes comparing implant, free flap, and pedicled flap reconstruction. Patients undergoing implant, pedicled flap, and free flap reconstruction were identified in the 2011-2016 NSQIP database. Demographics were analyzed and covariates were balanced using overlap propensity score. Logistic regression was used for binary outcomes and Gamma GLM for length of stay (LOS). Of 23,834 patients, 87.7% underwent implant, 8.1% free flap, and 4.2% pedicled flap reconstruction. The implant group had the lowest mean operative time (206 min, SD 85.6). Implant patients had less pneumonia (OR 0.09, CI 0.02-0.36, p < 0.01), return to operating room (OR 0.62, CI 0.50-0.75, p < 0.01), venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR 0.33, CI 0.14-0.79, p = 0.01), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.10, CI 0.06-0.15, p < 0.01), and urinary tract infections (UTI) (OR 0.21, CI 0.07-0.58, p < 0.01) than free flap patients. Pedicled flap patients had less postoperative bleeding (OR 0.69, CI 0.49-0.96, p = 0.03) than free flap patients. Pedicled flap patients had more superficial surgical site infections (p = 0.03), pneumonia (p = 0.02), postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01), VTE (p = 0.04), sepsis (p = 0.05), and unplanned reintubation (p = 0.01) than implant patients. Implant patients had the lowest LOS (1.6 days, p < 0.01). Implant reconstruction has less short-term postoperative complications than free flaps and pedicled flap reconstructions. The overall complication rate among all reconstructive modalities remains acceptably low and patients should be informed of all surgical options.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33462766
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06073-8
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-06073-8
pmc: PMC8220930
mid: NIHMS1711744
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

525-533

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006927
Pays : United States

Références

American Cancer Society (2019) Cancer facts and figures 2019. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
Wink JD et al (2014) Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1612 cases from the ACS-NSQIP surgical outcomes database. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(6):375–381
doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2014.899240
Tuttle TM et al (2007) Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5203–5209
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141
Atisha D et al (2008) Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 247(6):1019–1028
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c
Albornoz CR et al (2013) A paradigm shift in US breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(1):15–23
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde
Lee GK, Sheckter CC (2018) Breast reconstruction following breast cancer treatment—2018. JAMA 320(12):1277–1278
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12190
Qin Q et al (2018) Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a retrospective study. Medicine 97(5):e9766
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009766
Eaves FF, Haeck PC, Rohrich RJ (2011) Breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma: using science to guide our patients and plastic surgeons worldwide. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2501–2503
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821787e0
Magnusson MR et al (2019) Breast implant illness: a way forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(3S):74S–81S
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005573
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/risks-and-complications-breast-implants
Fischer JP et al (2014) Complications and morbidity following breast reconstruction—a review of 16,063 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP datasets. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(2):104–114
doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.819003
Li F, Thomas LE, Li F (2019) Addressing extreme propensity scores via the overlap weights. Am J Epidemiol 188(1):250–257
pubmed: 30189042
Sabino J et al (2016) NSQIP analysis: increased immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Am Surg 82(6):540–545
doi: 10.1177/000313481608200616
Fischer JP et al (2013) Breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):928–934
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865977
Mortenson MM et al (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications: however, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg 139(9):988–991
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.9.988
DeLong MR et al (2017) Latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction—a nationwide inpatient sample review. Ann Plast Surg 78(5):S185–S188
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001079
Bamgbade OA et al (2007) Postoperative complications in obese and nonobese patients. World J Surg 31(3):556–560
doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0305-0
Fischer JP et al (2013) Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Am Coll Surg 217(4):656–664
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.031
McCarthy CM et al (2008) Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6):1886–1892
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817151c4
Ho A et al (2012) Long-term outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate 2-stage expander/implant reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation. Cancer 118(9):2552–2559
doi: 10.1002/cncr.26521
Fischer JP et al (2014) Mastectomy with or without immediate implant reconstruction has similar 30-day perioperative outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(11):1515–1522
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.07.021
Banuelos J et al (2019) The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program incompletely captures implant-based breast reconstruction complications. Ann Plast Surg 84:271–275
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002051
Berry T et al (2010) Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 17(3):202–210
doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1261-3
Alderman AK et al (2002) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2265–2274
doi: 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00015
Tsoi B et al (2014) Safety of tissue expander/implant versus autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(2):234–249
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436847.94408.11
Pusic AL et al (2017) Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium study. J Clin Oncol 35(22):2499
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9561
Santosa KB et al (2018) Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):891–899
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677

Auteurs

Murad J Karadsheh (MJ)

Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, 5501 Old York Rd, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.

Richard Tyrell (R)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.

Mengying Deng (M)

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Temple University Health System, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.

Brian L Egleston (BL)

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Temple University Health System, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.

James C Krupp (JC)

Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, 5501 Old York Rd, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.

M Shuja Shafqat (MS)

Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, 5501 Old York Rd, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.

Sameer A Patel (SA)

Department of Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, 5501 Old York Rd, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA. sameer.patel@fccc.edu.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA. sameer.patel@fccc.edu.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA. sameer.patel@fccc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH