Features of durable response and treatment efficacy for capecitabine monotherapy in advanced breast cancer: real-world evidence from a large single-centre cohort.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Capecitabine
/ therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast
/ drug therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular
/ drug therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Young Adult
Capecitabine monotherapy
Durable response
Metastatic breast cancer
Treatment efficacy
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
08
11
2020
accepted:
27
11
2020
pubmed:
21
1
2021
medline:
26
3
2021
entrez:
20
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In metastatic breast cancer (MBC) population treated with capecitabine monotherapy, we investigated clinical-pathological features as possible biomarkers for the oncological outcome. Retrospective study of consecutive MBC patients treated at University Hospitals Leuven starting capecitabine between 1999 and 2017. The primary endpoint was the durable response (DR), defined as non-progressive disease for > 52 weeks. Other main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). We included 506 patients; mean age at primary breast cancer diagnosis was 51.2 years; 18.2% had de novo MBC; 98.8% were pre-treated with taxanes and/or anthracycline. DR was reached in 11.6%. Patients with DR, as compared to those without DR, were more likely oestrogen receptor (ER) positive (91.5% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.010) at first diagnosis, had a lower incidence of lymph node (LN) involvement (35.6% vs. 49.9%, p = 0.039) before starting capecitabine, were more likely to present with metastases limited to ≤ 2 involved sites (54.2% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.020) and time from metastasis to start of capecitabine was longer (mean 3.5 vs. 2.7 years, p = 0.020). ORR was 22%. Median TTP and OS were 28 and 58 weeks, respectively. In multivariate analysis (only performed for TTP), ER positivity (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.529, p < 0.0001), HER2 negativity (HR = 0.582, p = 0.024), absence of LN (HR = 0.751, p = 0.008) and liver involvement (HR = 0.746, p = 0.013), older age at capecitabine start (HR = 0.925, p < 0.0001) and younger age at diagnosis of MBC (HR = 0.935, p = 0.001) were significant features of longer TTP. Our data display relevant clinical-pathological features associated with DR and TTP in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy for MBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33471187
doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03487-1
pii: 10.1007/s00432-020-03487-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
0
Capecitabine
6804DJ8Z9U
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1041-1048Références
Barchiesi G, Krasniqi E, Barba M et al (2019) Highly durable response to capecitabine in patient with metastatic estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017135
doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000017135
Costi M, Ferrari S, Venturelli A et al (2005) Thymidylate Synthase Structure, Function and Implication in Drug Discovery. Curr Med Chem 12(19):2241–2258. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867054864868
doi: 10.2174/0929867054864868
pubmed: 16178783
Dean L (2012) Capecitabine therapy and DPYD genotype. National Center for Biotechnology Information, US
Hong JY, Park YH, Choi MK et al (2015) Characterization of durable responder for capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2015.04.004
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.04.004
pubmed: 25997855
Lee SH, Lee J, Park J et al (2004) Capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Med Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1385/MO:21:3:223
doi: 10.1385/MO:21:3:223
pubmed: 15456949
Lee SJ, La CY, Park YH et al (2011) Thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase as predictive markers of capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1545-0
doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1545-0
pubmed: 22119758
pmcid: 3313017
Levin MK, Wang K, Yelensky R et al (2015) Genomic alterations in DNA repair and chromatin remodeling genes in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with exceptional responses to capecitabine. Cancer Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.464
doi: 10.1002/cam4.464
pubmed: 25871911
pmcid: 4559040
Martin M, Campone M, Bondarenko I et al (2018) Randomised phase III trial of vinflunine plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and resistant to taxane. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy063
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy063
pubmed: 30124753
pmcid: 5913649
Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5 fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00058-6
doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00058-6
pubmed: 9849491
Oostendorp LJM, Stalmeier PFM, Donders ART et al (2011) Efficacy and safety of palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 12(11):1053–1061
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70045-6
Osako T, Ito Y, Ushijima M et al (2009) Predictive factors for efficacy of capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-008-0806-7
doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0806-7
pubmed: 18670777
Saif MW, Katirtzoglou NA, Syrigos KN (2008) Capecitabine: An overview of the side effects and their management. Anticancer Drugs 19(5):447–464
doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3282f945aa
Siddiqui A, Gollavilli PN, Schwab A et al (2019) Thymidylate synthase maintains the de-differentiated state of triple negative breast cancers. Cell Death Differ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-019-0289-6
doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0289-6
pubmed: 30737477
pmcid: 6888897
Siva M, Correa P, Skaria S, Canney P (2008) Capecitabine in advanced breast cancer: predictive factors for response. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1126
doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.1126
Tabata T, Katoh M, Tokudome S et al (2004) Bioactivation of capecitabine in human liver: Involvement of the cytosolic enzyme on 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine formation. Drug Metab Dispos. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.32.7.762
doi: 10.1124/dmd.32.7.762
pubmed: 15269188
White AM, Lau PKH, Redfern AD, Bulsara MK (2014) Capecitabine for ER-positive versus ER-negative breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011220
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011220
pubmed: 25519471
pmcid: 7263424
Wilson A, Laurenti E, Oser G et al (2008) Hematopoietic stem cells reversibly switch from dormancy to self-renewal during homeostasis and repair. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.048
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.048
pubmed: 19062086
Wilson PM, Danenberg PV, Johnston PG et al (2014) Standing the test of time: targeting thymidylate biosynthesis in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11(5):282
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.51
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2015) Xeloda (capecitabine). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020896s037lbl.pdf . (Accessed 8 Dec 2019)
Yin W, Pei G, Liu G et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of capecitabine-based first-line chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5460
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5460
pubmed: 26675761
pmcid: 5029621