Cultural Components of Sex Differences in Color Preference.
Journal
Child development
ISSN: 1467-8624
Titre abrégé: Child Dev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372725
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
22
1
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
21
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Preferences for pink and blue were tested in children aged 4-11 years in three small-scale societies: Shipibo villages in the Peruvian Amazon, kastom villages in the highlands of Tanna Island, Vanuatu, and BaYaka foragers in the northern Republic of Congo; and compared to children from an Australian global city (total N = 232). No sex differences were found in preference for pink in any of the three societies not influenced by global culture (ds - 0.31-0.23), in contrast to a female preference for pink in the global city (d = 1.24). Results suggest that the pairing of female and pink is a cultural phenomenon and is not driven by an essential preference for pink in girls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33476046
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13528
pmc: PMC8451877
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1574-1589Subventions
Organisme : Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust
Organisme : Gates Cambridge Trust
Organisme : School of the Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge
Organisme : Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
ID : 752-2016-0555
Organisme : Clare College, University of Cambridge
Organisme : Smuts Memorial Fund, University of Cambridge
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.
Références
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R623-5
pubmed: 17714645
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Jul;44(5):1243-54
pubmed: 25680819
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8205-8210
pubmed: 28696282
Arch Sex Behav. 2003 Feb;32(1):7-14
pubmed: 12597267
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2002;67(2):i-viii, 1-147; discussion 148-83
pubmed: 12465575
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 10;109(2):E32-3; author reply E34
pubmed: 22219355
Emotion. 2012 Oct;12(5):1155-60
pubmed: 21910538
South Am Indian Stud. 1994 Mar;(4):77-86
pubmed: 12319069
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Aug;46(6):1555-1563
pubmed: 28664466
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):213-9
pubmed: 18489237
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):598-614
pubmed: 21752009
Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):346-54
pubmed: 20136931
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):448-56
pubmed: 20724210
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 30;6:30
pubmed: 25688219
Vision Res. 2018 Oct;151:99-116
pubmed: 28716520
Hum Nat. 2016 Mar;27(1):51-67
pubmed: 26590826
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;29(Pt 3):656-67
pubmed: 21848751
Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1583-93
pubmed: 18826544
Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;40(7):1590-1616
pubmed: 26400420
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Dec;41(6):1321-3
pubmed: 22821170
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82
pubmed: 20421475
Psychol Rev. 1957 Nov;64, Part 1(6):384-404
pubmed: 13505974
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Dec;39(6):1261-73
pubmed: 20232129
Child Dev. 2020 Jul;91(4):1284-1301
pubmed: 31553073
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):916-22
pubmed: 23435629
Horm Behav. 2009 May;55(5):570-8
pubmed: 19446073
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1195-201
pubmed: 24570324
Vision Res. 2007 May;47(10):1368-81
pubmed: 17118421
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1015-27
pubmed: 23148465
Vision Res. 1993 May;33(8):1053-65
pubmed: 8506645
Am J Hum Biol. 2020 Jul;32(4):e23342
pubmed: 31750984
Perception. 2019 May;48(5):428-436
pubmed: 30982405