Brachytherapy boost (BT-boost) or stereotactic body radiation therapy boost (SBRT-boost) for high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa).
Androgen Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Brachytherapy
/ adverse effects
Clinical Trials as Topic
Combined Modality Therapy
/ methods
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
Radiosurgery
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy boost
Cancer de la prostate
Cancer de la prostate à haut risque
Curiethérapie
High-risk prostate cancer
Prostate cancer
Radiothérapie corporelle stéréotaxique
Stereotactic body radiation therapy
Stereotactic body radiation therapy boost
Stimulation de la curiethérapie
Stimulation de la radiothérapie corporelle stéréotaxique
Journal
Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique
ISSN: 1769-6658
Titre abrégé: Cancer Radiother
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9711272
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
30
03
2020
revised:
21
11
2020
accepted:
25
11
2020
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
4
6
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systematic review for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa, D'Amico classification risk system) with external body radiation therapy (EBRT)+brachytherapy-boost (BT-boost) or with EBRT+stereotactic body RT-boost (SBRT-boost). In March 2020, 391 English citations on PubMed matched with search terms "high risk prostate cancer boost". Respectively 9 and 48 prospective and retrospective studies were on BT-boost and 7 retrospective studies were on SBRT-boost. Two SBRT-boost trials were prospective. Only one study (ASCENDE-RT) directly compared the gold standard treatment [dose-escalation (DE)-EBRT+androgen deprivation treatment (ADT)] versus EBRT+ADT+BT-boost. Biochemical control rates at 9 years were 83% in the experimental arm versus 63% in the standard arm. Cumulative incidence of late grade 3 urinary toxicity in the experimental arm and in the standard arm was respectively 18% and 5%. Two recent studies with HR-PCa (National Cancer Database) demonstrated better overall survival with BT-boost (low dose rate LDR or high dose rate HDR) compared with DE-EBRT. These recent findings demonstrate the superiority of EBRT+BT-boost+ADT versus DE-EBRT+ADT for HR-PCa. It seems that EBRT+BT-boost+ADT could now be considered as a gold standard treatment for HR-PCa. HDR or LDR are options. SBRT-boost represents an attractive alternative, but the absence of randomised trials does not allow us to conclude for HR-PCa. Prospective randomised international phase III trials or meta-analyses could improve the level of evidence of SBRT-boost for HR-PCa.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33478838
pii: S1278-3218(20)30365-6
doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.11.004
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
400-409Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.