Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths using the Kato-Katz technique: What is the influence of stirring, storage time and storage temperature on stool sample egg counts?
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
02
09
2020
accepted:
03
12
2020
revised:
03
02
2021
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
18
5
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soil-transmitted helminths infect about one fifth of the world's population and have a negative impact on health. The Kato-Katz technique is the recommended method to detect soil-transmitted helminth eggs in stool samples, particularly in programmatic settings. However, some questions in its procedure remain. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of storage time, storage temperature and stirring of stool samples on fecal egg counts (FECs). In the framework of a clinical trial on Pemba Island, United Republic of Tanzania, 488 stool samples were collected from schoolchildren. These samples were evaluated in three experiments. In the first experiment (n = 92), two Kato-Katz slides were prepared from the same stool sample, one was stored at room temperature, the other in a refrigerator for 50 hours, and each slide was analyzed at nine time points (20, 50, 80, 110, 140 minutes, 18, 26, 42 and 50 hours). In the second experiment (n = 340), whole stool samples were split into two, one part was stored at room temperature, and the other part was put in a refrigerator for 48 hours. From each part one Kato-Katz slide was prepared and analyzed at three time points over two days (0, 24 and 48 hours). In the third experiment (n = 56), whole stool samples where stirred for 15 seconds six times and at each time point a Kato-Katz slide was prepared and analyzed. Mean hookworm FECs of Kato-Katz slides stored at room temperature steadily decreased following slide preparation. After two hours, mean hookworm FECs decreased from 22 to 16, whereas no reduction was observed if Kato-Katz slides were stored in the refrigerator (19 vs 21). The time x storage interaction effect was statistically significant (coefficient 0.26, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.35, p < 0.0001). After 24 hours mean hookworm FECs dropped close to zero, irrespective of the storage condition. Whole stool samples stored at room temperature for one day resulted in a mean hookworm FEC decrease of 23% (p < 0.0001), compared to a 13% reduction (p < 0.0001) if samples were stored in the refrigerator. Fecal egg counts of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura remained stable over time regardless of storage temperature of whole stool samples. Finally, we found a significant reduction of the variation of hookworm and T. trichiura eggs with increasing rounds of stirring the sample, but not for A. lumbricoides. For hookworm we observed a simultaneous decrease in mean FECs, making it difficult to draw recommendations on stirring samples. Our findings suggest that stool samples (i) should be analyzed on the day of collection and (ii) should be analyzed between 20-30 minutes after slide preparation; if that is not possible, Kato-Katz slides can be stored in a refrigerator for a maximum of 110 minutes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Soil-transmitted helminths infect about one fifth of the world's population and have a negative impact on health. The Kato-Katz technique is the recommended method to detect soil-transmitted helminth eggs in stool samples, particularly in programmatic settings. However, some questions in its procedure remain. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of storage time, storage temperature and stirring of stool samples on fecal egg counts (FECs).
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
In the framework of a clinical trial on Pemba Island, United Republic of Tanzania, 488 stool samples were collected from schoolchildren. These samples were evaluated in three experiments. In the first experiment (n = 92), two Kato-Katz slides were prepared from the same stool sample, one was stored at room temperature, the other in a refrigerator for 50 hours, and each slide was analyzed at nine time points (20, 50, 80, 110, 140 minutes, 18, 26, 42 and 50 hours). In the second experiment (n = 340), whole stool samples were split into two, one part was stored at room temperature, and the other part was put in a refrigerator for 48 hours. From each part one Kato-Katz slide was prepared and analyzed at three time points over two days (0, 24 and 48 hours). In the third experiment (n = 56), whole stool samples where stirred for 15 seconds six times and at each time point a Kato-Katz slide was prepared and analyzed. Mean hookworm FECs of Kato-Katz slides stored at room temperature steadily decreased following slide preparation. After two hours, mean hookworm FECs decreased from 22 to 16, whereas no reduction was observed if Kato-Katz slides were stored in the refrigerator (19 vs 21). The time x storage interaction effect was statistically significant (coefficient 0.26, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.35, p < 0.0001). After 24 hours mean hookworm FECs dropped close to zero, irrespective of the storage condition. Whole stool samples stored at room temperature for one day resulted in a mean hookworm FEC decrease of 23% (p < 0.0001), compared to a 13% reduction (p < 0.0001) if samples were stored in the refrigerator. Fecal egg counts of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura remained stable over time regardless of storage temperature of whole stool samples. Finally, we found a significant reduction of the variation of hookworm and T. trichiura eggs with increasing rounds of stirring the sample, but not for A. lumbricoides. For hookworm we observed a simultaneous decrease in mean FECs, making it difficult to draw recommendations on stirring samples.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings suggest that stool samples (i) should be analyzed on the day of collection and (ii) should be analyzed between 20-30 minutes after slide preparation; if that is not possible, Kato-Katz slides can be stored in a refrigerator for a maximum of 110 minutes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33481808
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009032
pii: PNTD-D-20-01576
pmc: PMC7857572
doi:
Substances chimiques
Soil
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0009032Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Feb 05;8:82
pubmed: 25652120
Nat Protoc. 2010 Mar;5(3):503-15
pubmed: 20203667
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1972 Nov-Dec;14(6):397-400
pubmed: 4675644
Trends Parasitol. 2009 Apr;25(4):151-6
pubmed: 19269899
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(12):e1969
pubmed: 23285307
Int J Parasitol. 2010 Mar 15;40(4):399-404
pubmed: 19772859
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jan 21;7:37
pubmed: 24447578
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Dec 08;2:16088
pubmed: 27929101
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968 May;17(3):382-91
pubmed: 5690644
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Apr;103(4):347-54
pubmed: 19168197
Acta Trop. 2004 Nov-Dec;92(3):205-12
pubmed: 15533288
Parasitology. 2003 Dec;127(Pt 6):525-31
pubmed: 14700188
J Glob Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;3(2):175-82
pubmed: 21731306
Gates Open Res. 2020 Mar 10;4:28
pubmed: 32266328
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jun 4;12(6):e0006562
pubmed: 29864132
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Oct;109(10):669-71
pubmed: 26385937
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jun;5(6):e1201
pubmed: 21695104
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 4;11(10):e0005953
pubmed: 28976979
Parasit Vectors. 2010 Aug 14;3:71
pubmed: 20707931
Int J Parasitol. 2014 Oct 1;44(11):765-74
pubmed: 24992655
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Feb;101(2):140-5
pubmed: 16824566
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1981;75(5):682-7
pubmed: 7330922
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 1;13(8):e0007446
pubmed: 31369558
J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 11;221(Suppl 5):S531-S538
pubmed: 31829425
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(11):e331
pubmed: 18982057
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep 20;27:100556
pubmed: 33150325
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1985;79(6):812-25
pubmed: 3832493
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1859-1922
pubmed: 30415748
Trop Med Int Health. 1997 Mar;2(3):261-4
pubmed: 9491105
Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):252-265
pubmed: 28882382
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;13(2):207-22
pubmed: 10755998